You are not logged in.
awesome
fck art, lets dance.
Offline
more like dwm </lame joke>
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
Looks great, bright. I also like the main tabs moved below the adds.
Offline
thosewholovethenewdesign++;
It's simple and clean... just like Arch!
Offline
was unsure about the new logo but now in context, it _really_ rox !
do want wallpapers nao !
Offline
Same here. At first I wasn't quite convinced by the choice, but seeing it in context is something else. Congratulations!
larch: http://larch.berlios.de
Offline
Yep, it's looking fresh, like some sun-light was let in.
Offline
Great design. It's clean and simple and the logo and colors are awesome.
Offline
Beautiful design. A stylish website for a stylish distribution.
Offline
very nice. compare the new logo/look with the old one still in the wiki.
clean, sharp, professional. the "archer" is most excellent.
Offline
wow... looks great :-)
Registed Linux User 608596
Offline
just right, to quote Goldilocks.
Offline
Very nice.
Offline
awesome
exactly what I thought. that's a perfect fit with the WM.
To know recursion, you must first know recursion.
Offline
I think it's awesome! Whoever was behind the page's design did an outstanding job, in my opinion. In the beginning, my feelings were the same as a couple of others here: I was not entirely swayed when I first saw the winning logo, whose creator did an equally fantastic job, by the way. I wasn't too sure if the new logo could accommodate a web layout that reflected Arch's rational elegance. I must admit that I had a rather pessimistic attitude towards the whole thing, and I think I am correct by saying now that the individuals who worked at the logo integration saw something that I did not.
I do have one question, though. Was Judd involved in the logo selection process and the site's re-design? It would be wonderful to know that the brainchild of this elegant distribution, the individual who was the one who conceived of this entire thing, played a part in the composition, or at least had given his genuine approval for the proposed logo.
The only thing I will say is that I can think of several words that (I believe) could fit Arch better, other than "lightweight," such as "elegant" or "rational": Arch Linux . . . A simple, rational linux distribution.
My happiness scale (4 hearts is the highest): <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 (!)
Without error there can be no brilliancy. ― Emanuel Lasker
Offline
just KISS
old++
Last edited by Husio (2008-01-12 10:55:26)
Offline
I think it's awesome! Whoever was behind the page's design did an outstanding job, in my opinion. In the beginning, my feelings were the same as a couple of others here: I was not entirely swayed when I first saw the winning logo, whose creator did an equally fantastic job, by the way. I wasn't too sure if the new logo could accommodate a web layout that reflected Arch's rational elegance. I must admit that I had a rather pessimistic attitude towards the whole thing, and I think I am correct by saying now that the individuals who worked at the logo integration saw something that I did not.
Some of it might be a bit ugly for a while. I slapped all the headers in tonight without much regard for the colors quite yet. So there are still some tweaks to come.
I do have one question, though. Was Judd involved in the logo selection process and the site's re-design? It would be wonderful to know that the brainchild of this elegant distribution, the individual who was the one who conceived of this entire thing, played a part in the composition, or at least had given his genuine approval for the proposed logo.
To partially answer your question, Judd did vote on the logos with the rest of us, so yes we had his input
The suggestion box only accepts patches.
Offline
more like dwm </lame joke>
ahah, I love it. It's true, the blue is similar : http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-20070930.png
pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))
Offline
The homepage does not work for me! (It displays the old setup plus text instead of the new logo). The other pages are working fine however.
Edit: now it works.... weird
By the way the small bookmark icon varies from the old logo to the new one
Last edited by mrB (2008-01-12 12:09:23)
Offline
Clean your cache ctrl+alt+del in firefox! Add add a new bookmark for arch, then the logo should change
Is AUR also getting the new design?
Offline
Nearly perfect:the small numbers in the blue vertical bars at right are nearly illisible, they need a slightly bolder type.
Offline
With firefox's cache clean the homepage works, but no AUR does not
Last edited by mrB (2008-01-12 14:50:00)
Offline
Really nice design... <3
Offline
I've already commented in an older thread, but in case those responsible aren't reading it any more I completely agree with everyone else: it looks even better in context, and really chimes with Arch's philosophy.
0 Ok, 0:1
Offline
The new design look really sweet! (Reminded me of Openbox ).
Can't wait for the Wiki and AUR to use the same theme.
Offline