This will be fixed in 2.6-3
]]>maybe we should remove one copy from one of these packages --- if they are really the same ... so that no conflicts come up
someone who knows more about gnome-python should comment my post, please
]]>Kritoke
]]>[root@Asteraceae damir]# uuuu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
current.db.tar.gz [####################################] 100% | 32K
unofficial.db.tar.gz [####################################] 100% | 61K
unstable.db.tar.gz [####################################] 100% | 2K
:: ed2k-gtk-gui-0.6.0-1: local version is newer
:: hotplug-2003_08_05-1: local version is newer
:: Above packages will be skipped. To manually upgrade use 'pacman -S <pkg>'
Targets: pygtk-2.0.0-1 gnome-python-2.0.0-1 gtkhtml-3.0.8-1 libgpg-error-0.3-1
libgcrypt-1.1.42-1
Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n]
loading package data... done.
checking for file conflicts...
error: the following file conflicts were found:
usr: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/pkgconfig: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/python2.3: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share/pygtk: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share/pygtk/2.0: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/bin: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/include: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/share: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/bin: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/include: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/share: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/bin: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/include: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share/aclocal: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
[root@Asteraceae damir]#
... are these the same files? what package should i first install? it's only me having this conflict? (use pacman2.6)
]]>