Thanks a lot jamielinux !
]]>Not keen on formatting back my mp3 player. Too bad that they are no workaround to show device in bashmount ?
Fixed in bashmount 3.1.0
]]>I guess that the internal memory is in /dev/sdc.
You can see the output of lsblk -plno NAME here [...]
The device sdc does not contain a partition. Bashmount only displays partitions, not devices, that means /dev/sdc is not displayed.
You need to create a partition and a filesystem on the device.
You can see the output of lsblk -plno NAME here : http://pastebin.com/F6xNG2r3
and the output of lsblk -a -plno NAME there : http://pastebin.com/9kMEbB2r
I also posted a screenshot of bashmount here : http://imagebin.org/303734
I hope it helps !
]]>Bashmount is great but I get one little issue (that may come from me). I have a mp3 player with an internal memory and an mini sd-card.
The sd-card is shown in the list of device and can be mounted. That's not the case for the internal memory. If I use for example udevil, then the internal memory is shown and mounted.
Would you need some outputs to see if there is an little issue in bashmount ?
bashmount uses `lsblk` to find devices.
What is the location of the internal memory in /dev/ ?
Can you post the output of
lsblk -plno NAME
and
lsblk -a -plno NAME
and see if your device is listed?
]]>Bashmount is great but I get one little issue (that may come from me). I have a mp3 player with an internal memory and an mini sd-card.
The sd-card is shown in the list of device and can be mounted. That's not the case for the internal memory. If I use for example udevil, then the internal memory is shown and mounted.
Would you need some outputs to see if there is an little issue in bashmount ?
Thanks again for your work !
]]>https://sourceforge.net/projects/bashmount/
bashmount 3.0.0 (2014-03-23)
- Allow pressing [enter] to refresh device list
https://sourceforge.net/projects/bashmount/
bashmount 3.0.0beta2 (2014-03-23)
- Fix newline in UI
bashmount 3.0.0beta1 (2014-03-23)
- Autodetect the presence of udisksctl, but also allow to manually disable
the use of udisks
- Re-order the configuration file and remove redundant options
- Allow blacklisting by TYPE
- The first three custom commands are now built-in to bashmount, so only
custom4_command, custom5_command and custom6_command are configurable
- Remove show_device_path option, and instead always show the device path
bashmount 3.0.0alpha1 (2014-03-23)
Many thanks to Lukas B. (aka https://github.com/vitamins) for porting
bashmount to use lsblk where appropriate and a variety of other changes:
- Information retrieval is now based on `lsblk` instead of `udisksctl`,
which allows us to get rid of a lot of horrible parsing
- Devices are sorted by internal media, removable media and optical media
- Only partitions are listed, no disks
- Opened luks containers are also listed by default
Configuration file:
- Add "mount_command" and "unmount_command" which can be configured by the
user
- "optical_devices" and "removable_devices" are no longer present
- "show_internal" is set to '1' by default
- "show_removable_device_filename" and "show_optical_device_filename" have
been replaced by a single variable named "show_device_path"
- "fancy_sort" is no longer present
Hi,
recently i did a rewrite of bashmount that does not depend on udisks.
Hi! I'm the original bashmount author (I lost my previous bbs login). Really cool changes. I'd love to see some pull requests
]]>Awebb wrote:What exactly does replacing printf with echo achieve?
I have used echo out of habit, and the code is easier to read, but according to this the change should probably reverted.
I only asked because you explicitly mention it on your changes page, so I thought this might be a big deal for some reason and wanted to know why. I use printf out of habit, since it's not unique to bash.
]]>What exactly does replacing printf with echo achieve?
I have used echo out of habit, and the code is easier to read, but according to this the change should probably reverted.
]]>By the way, i also got rid of the fancy sort function and other hacks ;-)
What exactly does replacing printf with echo achieve?
]]>