Should I use for example "/dev/disc/disc0/part1" or "/dev/hda1"?
yes sir, that's correct, I mean you should change the first one to the second one,
Which is the better naming scheme?
the udev/old one seems to be the way to go for the moment even if devfs naming scheme did make some sense also, I don't think the last word is said about this matter yet,
]]>After that point it really doesn't matter as long as fstab and inittab (and probably some more) files are configured to use the correct device names in /dev.
]]>Which is the better naming scheme?
]]>Half the advantage of using udev is getting away from devfs' lame ass naming scheme.
]]>Yesterday, I changed from devfs to udev. There were no problems, but after removing the dev filesystem from the kernel (I compilied a new Kernel without devfs filesystem support), I recieve a kernel panic error by booting the system with the new kernel.
The devfs option is marked as "obsolete"
Do I need the devfs option any more?
Thanks for your answers!
Greetings,
Flasher
]]>