EDIT: Will this pkg make the /lib to /usr/lib etc. move?
Doubtful - that would be one of the last packages to change...
]]>EDIT: Will this pkg make the /lib to /usr/lib etc. move?
]]>the.ridikulus.rat wrote:Since which version of pacman, a decimal pkgrel is allowed?
For over two years, that much I can say.
Since the start...
]]>Fri Jan 20 11:09:20 2012: :: Remounting Root ^[[231G [BUSY] ^[[231G [DONE]
Fri Jan 20 11:09:20 2012: :: Mounting Local Filesystems ^[[231G [BUSY] ^[[231G [FAIL]
Fri Jan 20 11:09:21 2012: :: Starting Network ^[[231G [BUSY] ^[[231G [DONE]
Fri Jan 20 11:09:30 2012: :: Starting rpcbind ^[[231G [BUSY] ^[[231G [DONE]
Fri Jan 20 11:09:30 2012: :: Starting rpc.statd daemon ^[[231G [BUSY] ^[[231G [DONE]
Fri Jan 20 11:09:30 2012: :: Mounting Network Filesystems ^[[231G [BUSY] ^[[231G [FAIL]
However, everything seems to be working correctly and my NFS share is correctly mounted.
Please let me know what other details you may require
]]>Since which version of pacman, a decimal pkgrel is allowed?
For over two years, that much I can say.
]]>Use Tom's packages, even though the versioning is a bit strange
Yeah. Noticed that. Since which version of pacman, a decimal pkgrel is allowed?
]]>I also enabled the new mount for now, but expect to revert before 2.21. Depends on what kind of feedback we get really.
]]>And if you want the nitty gritty details, a full changelog can be found here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/ut … -ChangeLog
Bug-type feedback is encouraged. Of particular interest is mount and umount, as I've enabled entirely new implementations based purely on libmount. No, this won't be the default for Arch's actual 2.21 package, but I've been using it myself and haven't found any show stoppers yet. That said, you should expect to find bugs of varying severities and perhaps slightly different behavior, but I'm very much interested in finding these bugs now so that we can perhaps enable this for 2.22.
]]>