Don’t have used a file manager for years...
]]>GUI
[57] Thunar
[45] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[17] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[4] Xfe
[4] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
[1] gqview
I love vifm because of the vi bindings, ex mode, and also because I can use, for instance, sshfs by just creating an empty file with my ssh prefs inside, virtually creating a new "folder" type for each fuse entry
I like nemo because it 'just works' no matter what WM/DE I'm using, unlike, say, Nautilus, that depends heavily on Gnome being loaded for extra features
]]>GUI
[57] Thunar
[45] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[17] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[4] Xfe
[3] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
[1] gqview
Looked up Ranger & vifm and they indeed qualify as OFM.
Thanks for the tip, bstaletic.
I like Orthodox File Managers
For Konsole that narrows things down to 1 choice , Midnight Commander .
There are more choises than Midnight Commander for terminal usage as well. I am using vifm and I know Ranger is another option.
Also are you sure "Konsole" is used inside a terminal window?
]]>I like Orthodox File Managers and favor reliability and functionality over speed.
For Konsole that narrows things down to 1 choice , Midnight Commander . For graphical environments there are more options.
People that are not familiar with OFMs will make different choices.
]]>CLI
[125] coreutils
[58] ranger
[30] Midnight Commander
[6] vifm
[5] emacs dired
[3] vidir
[3] rsync
[1] gitfm
[1] vfu
[1] unison
GUI
[57] Thunar
[45] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[16] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[4] Xfe
[3] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
[1] gqview
COMMENT
Obviously I'm not happy, and 'constantly' looking around for alternatives!
Why is the the category called CLI when there's TUI programs in it?
Probably because the CLI category would then contain two entries? Anyway I don't think people would mind changing the category name to "CLI/TUI".
]]>GUI
[57] Thunar
[45] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[16] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[3] Xfe
[3] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
[1] gqview
Why is the the category called CLI when there's TUI programs in it?
]]>GUI
[57] Thunar
[45] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[16] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[3] Xfe
[3] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
[1] gqview
I use much coreutils but I do not count them as a filemanager. I use gqview's file management capabilities for moving and deleting images.
GUI
[57] Thunar
[45] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[16] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[3] Xfe
[3] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
I'm including "tree" in coreutils even though it isn't actually part of it. I also use Midnight Commander occasionally, but not enough to vote for it.
]]>GUI
[57] Thunar
[44] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[16] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[3] Xfe
[3] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
GUI
[56] Thunar
[44] Dolphin
[31] PCManFM
[23] SpaceFM
[16] Nautilus
[9] Krusader
[8] ROX Filer
[3] Xfe
[3] nemo
[3] Sunflower
[2] qtfm
[2] Marlin
[3] caja
[1] meld
[1] gnome-commander
[1] Konqueror
[1] Enlightenment File Manager
[1] muCommander
[1] Double Commander
[1] fsv
[1] gnome-files
I do something like 90% Ranger, >5% Coreutils + unison, rsync and <5% whatever-gui-that-launches-and-has-thumbnails
As folders are a core part of my workflow I couldn't be happy with just Coreutils. I tend to jump/copy-paste/launch the information I need way faster with ranger than with any gui. I ought to the guys who first posted some ranger keystrokes in Arch wiki and to the devs. BTW I believe the AUTHORS file is missing in the Arch community package.
→ add yours: Just quote the preceeding entry, remove the tags, add your choices and repost.
]]>Let me vote.
GUI=dolphin,pcmanfm,gnome-files(was nautilus)
CLI=coreutils,rsync
Then vote by quoting the list and incrementing your choices.
]]>