adobe allows redistribution of flashplugin
Thank you for the info
]]>Firefox allows redistribution with one major catch: They do not allow you to use the official name/branding, if you build a package from source, unless you have prior consent from them. (this is why arch packaged firefox without the branding for quite a long time)
I read this topic https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=115687
Thank you
I apologize, I will check the Wiki right now.
I was thinking about Firefox in particularly.
Thank you
Firefox allows redistribution with one major catch: They do not allow you to use the official name/branding, if you build a package from source, unless you have prior consent from them. (this is why arch packaged firefox without the branding for quite a long time)
]]>While it is on the wiki, the right search term might be elusive to someone new to the "*nix ecosystem".
Check out the Licenses page. Your question depends on the specific license of the package in question, but you will find that most packages in the *nix world are under a couple of these licenses which are very similar for what you are asking.
Is there a specific peice of software you are thinking about?
I apologize, I will check the Wiki right now.
I was thinking about Firefox in particularly.
Thank you
Check out the Licenses page. Your question depends on the specific license of the package in question, but you will find that most packages in the *nix world are under a couple of these licenses which are very similar for what you are asking.
Is there a specific peice of software you are thinking about?
]]>