Such threads, in my opinion, are meant to 'roll', and questions on 'what's the name of that theme' are part of the discussion (I've found the answers helpful in getting my conky up and running for example).
OK, point taken.
]]>Perhaps a note in the forums header note/rules would help folks to be more disciplined.
*snickers* yep, that would certainly help.
Such threads, in my opinion, are meant to 'roll', and questions on 'what's the name of that theme' are part of the discussion (I've found the answers helpful in getting my conky up and running for example).
]]>mloskot wrote:Anyhow, at least this thread may highlight the issue and do the job itself.
I doubt it
Indeed, it may be that I'm getting old and sentimental after the 'old school' Usenet & mailing lists etiquette
mloskot wrote:I sent a small appeal to posters in that thread asking for consideration, to stick to the "what should you post" request.
I chuckled and cringed at the posts directly following yours that ignore canistra's request.
Yeah, I sense some influences by the The Complete Guide to Not Giving a F**k, especially
FACT NUMBER 4. Those who don’t give a f**k change the world. The rest do not.
I give up then and let them be innovative
Anyway, I think the Arch Linux forum is one of the "cleanest" forums on the web, so it's not really a big deal.
Sure thing.
]]>I sent a small appeal to posters in that thread asking for consideration, to stick to the "what should you post" request.
I chuckled and cringed at the posts directly following yours that ignore canistra's request.
Anyway, I think the Arch Linux forum is one of the "cleanest" forums on the web, so it's not really a big deal.
]]>Anyhow, at least this thread may highlight the issue and do the job itself.
I doubt it
]]>IMO, the fluxBB devs would have a hard time figuring out which type of content to allow in what threads since there is no set definition of what types of threads are possible.
Yes, you are right. Generally, this kind of moderation, automatic or human-supported, would be not ideal and may be painful.
Perhaps a note in the forums header note/rules would help folks to be more disciplined.
Anyhow, at least this thread may highlight the issue and do the job itself.
]]>Perhaps it should become a rule in the forum and only posts with relevant content are accepted to such threads.
All posts without relevant content (e.g. lack of dot files) or non-constructive posts like "could you share your config" follow-ups would immediately go to trash
You will have to take this up with the FluxBB devs. We do not and will not modify the forum software in any way.
IMO, the fluxBB devs would have a hard time figuring out which type of content to allow in what threads since there is no set definition of what types of threads are possible.
]]>I have a proposal to keep the sticky or continuously rolling threads clean
and avoid adding non-constructive posts to it.
There is number of threads dedicated to share desktop configurations and screenshots, etc.
For example the Share your Openbox Desktop thread..
canistra, who started the thread explicitly suggested What should you post.
I have tried to monitor it for a while, to filter actual visual content and attached config files, but it has become a real pain in arse!
I sent a small appeal to posters in that thread asking for consideration, to stick to the "what should you post" request.
But, I imagine this thread is not a lonely example and similar appeal would be relevant in threads dedicated to sharing other screens/configs.
Perhaps it should become a rule in the forum and only posts with relevant content are accepted to such threads.
All posts without relevant content (e.g. lack of dot files) or non-constructive posts like "could you share your config" follow-ups would immediately go to trash.
In case I'm the only annoyed, forget this.
]]>