2018-11-13T13:13:14ZFluxBBhttps://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=241885Given how many packages with older versions of <some-software> are in AUR, I'd expect it to be acceptable.
To make clear it's an older version you should probably call it thunderbird52 or thunderbird52-gtk2 .
]]>https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=45042018-11-13T13:13:14Zhttps://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1816427#p1816427https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/a … 26366.html]]>https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=800222018-11-13T12:49:35Zhttps://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1816421#p1816421Hello folks, some time ago a thunderbird-gtk2 pkgbuild has gone missing from aur. I'm still maintaining for my own system a version of thunderbird-gtk2 52.9.1-1, as it was the last one before most older extensions became deprecated. And gtk2 just because I still haven't found a replacement for my favourite motif. Anyway, I managed to get it working again with most recent Archlinux. Would it be against some rules to upload this pkgbuild into AUR?]]>https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=321362018-11-13T11:27:26Zhttps://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1816409#p1816409