Thanks a lot Andy.
]]>The call to erroneous call to /bin/mktemp means that tempfiles are created in / (i.e. root)
These are then not cleaned up.
I have filed a bug report, though this is porbably something that should be done upstream so that the source is distro agnostic.
P.S cheers for the package
]]>/usr/lib/go-openoffice-3.1.0.6/program/unopkg , line 68
calls /bin/mktemp whereas arch has /usr/bin/mktemp when attempting to list/install shared extensions
I edited the unopkg directly - had no obvious affect e.g. pdfimport still fails.
Nevertheless it might be something you want to tidy.
]]>I'm sorry to report that the table bug is NOT fixed with this latest alpha from testing. I can upload a sample file with the issue, if required.
Yep, I thought it was fixed cause I could open some .doc with tables, but some I can't still.
]]>I guess its related to our last gcc bump. Sadly commandline doesn't give any helpfull output.
]]>Hi,
I'm using x86 arch (not testing) and OOo 3.1.0 OOO310m11 Build 9399 and wanted to install the presenter extension. I got the error:
(com.sun.uno.RuntimeException) { { Message = "URP-Bridge: disposed(tid=23) No typedescription can be retrieved for type com.sun.star.bridge.XProtocolProperties", Context = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @0 } }
too. I need to install this extension. Anything that can I do? Or just waiting?
Thanks
I think this whole issue is related to the extension itself. Some extensions do work others don't. I think we can't really do anything about this. :-(
]]>I'm using x86 arch (not testing) and OOo 3.1.0 OOO310m11 Build 9399 and wanted to install the presenter extension. I got the error:
(com.sun.uno.RuntimeException) { { Message = "URP-Bridge: disposed(tid=23) No typedescription can be retrieved for type com.sun.star.bridge.XProtocolProperties", Context = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @0 } }
too. I need to install this extension. Anything that can I do? Or just waiting?
Thanks
]]>Thanks a lot Andy. Unfortunelly, the problem with java-based extensions isn't fixed. Should it?
Yeah, and the thing is that from the report from other users, I take it it is not java based extensions only, there are some extensions that do not work, we will have to check what is in common to troubleshoot this. I installed it from binary and all extensions work, so is something in compilation, I might think GCC 4.4.
]]>