Euhm ... Hapy, I guess he ain't talking to you?
Arielext: I believe he was replying on my "hApy: can't find it there "
hApy: yes, that's what I thought
would've been cool nevertheless
lol I was just kiddin man.
I was being a bit sarcastic because as far as I know there isn't any standard, and a review should just be what you feel like saying about it -- which is what you did.
Hapy.
sinister, then why don't you post your real review below?
Euhm ... Hapy, I guess he ain't talking to you?
]]>I was being a bit sarcastic because as far as I know there isn't any standard, and a review should just be what you feel like saying about it -- which is what you did.
Hapy.
]]>don't you think it's better to have a small review there than no review at all? now already 86 people have looked at it and might be interested in trying arch, otherwhise some or many of those 86 would've never heard of arch... (not in the near future at least)
if you look at some of the other reviews there, you can see that this is not even close to being the shortest review...
hApy: can't find it there
]]>see http://www.ieee.org/
Hapy.
]]>I've taken the liberty to review arch
http://www.linuxquestions.org/reviews/s … product=18
If you do not agree with me, have other + or - stuff to post about using arch, you can post a reply
I've used the 'about' text from this site as part of the review, I hope you don't mind me doing that apeiro???
]]>