You are not logged in.
Hi
Recently, I bought a Canon Pixma MP250 for my Arch box, because I read on OpenPrinter that it was perfectly supported.
It was a HUGE fake. It DOES NOT work out of the box with CUPS & Gutenprint, There is RPM, DEB and Source but no way to get it working on 64bits... but that's not my point...
My point is:
I want to buy a cheap multifunction printer that is WELL, and OUT OF THE BOX supported by CUPS & Gutenprint.
I don't want Canon, because of my bad experience (and their drivers are really bad)
I don't want to start a troll about constructors, I just want you to give the model of your printer if you are happy with it under Arch
Thanks
Offline
hi
HP printers generally have good driver support in linux , I use a HP Laserjet 1010 and it just works
hope this helps
Last edited by hadi (2010-10-08 19:50:31)
Offline
+1 for HP - they play well with linix.
I have a Photosmart 5580 that works great.
Offline
I am actually very happy with my two canon printers. Of course I went ahead and bought a license for turbo print. The best 30€ I ever spend. And no headaches with my printer support any more.
Else go with HP. They have decent Linux support.
EDIT: Spelling
Last edited by madeye (2010-10-08 21:55:24)
MadEye | Registered Linux user #167944 since 2000-02-28 | Homepage
Offline
I would have to say +1 for hp. Never had a problem with any of the ones I've used.
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."
Offline
Be warned cheap multifunction simply suck at 3 things, and not just one. "Cheap" printers simply hide their cost in ink carts.
Of the cheaper lot HPs have the best cross platform support.
Last edited by Skripka (2010-10-08 23:05:27)
Offline
Another vote for HP here, they have good Linux support, and I don't mind to pay extra for that. Vote with your wallet, I say. That's the only way companies understand.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I agree HP's are Linux friendly. However, I purchased Brother - they too have good Linux support (not quite as straightforward) but their ink costs are significantly less.
Philosophy is looking for a black cat in a dark room. Metaphysics is looking for a black cat in a dark room that isn't there. Religion is looking for a black cat in a dark room that isn't there and shouting "I found it!". Science is looking for a black cat in a dark room with a flashlight.
Offline
I understand you pal. But. Try another forums and another ways to do it. In example. HP P1005 works "very well" in linux, but not on arch. The ".run" file dont works. And a little time ago, when a work don't print on it, I should go to windows, do a "test printer" and return to arch. My print jobs were done "automaticaly"
Continue trying. It's not a brother problem. It's a "underground problem solved" that may let you so happy
Offline
HP P1005 works "very well" in linux, but not on arch. The ".run" file dont works.
What do you mean? Linux is a kernel. Arch/Ubuntu/Fedora/Gentoo are system and user applications running on top of the kernel. How could something not be possible on Arch if it is possible on another distro?
Offline
My HP laserjet P2015 just works for Arch.
Last edited by hitest (2010-10-09 19:30:26)
hitest
Arch, Slackware
Registered Linux User #284243
Offline
+1 for Brother. I have an MFC-240C that works great in Linux.
Offline
Hi,
Got an old PC spare? Install a print server, worked like a charm for me.
See this page if you feel like it
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=105954
Oh, you'll need (duh) to get a private LAN working, of course...
Thor
Offline
Same question, again. Anything new on the subject?
I had several Canon Pixma printers & multifunction printers. The "higher" ones, with duplex printing & stuff... They were - for 100-200$ - really great with windows, but if they worked with open source drivers or were even possible to get to work on x86_64 archlinux was more or less depending on the model, cups version... and luck. Same with the integrated scanner / sane.
Is there anything around that is comparable with those but works flawlessly with arch (/64), if possible even without proprietary drivers?
Offline