You are not logged in.
i recently enabled mutlilib support, syu'd, and now there's no flash in midori anymore. i'm using the standard midori from the extra repo, and the standard flashplugin from multilib repo. as the title of the thread suggests i'm running arch 64. i'm getting nada in midori, tried using the flash prelease package.....any ideas anyone?
thanks for your time reading this
Last edited by yabasta (2011-03-19 18:55:27)
Offline
You could try flashplugin-prerelease from the AUR instead. Works here with current midori-git. Should do with standard midori as well, however.
To know or not to know ...
... the questions remain forever.
Offline
no joy.....i'm getting this message :
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING:(/build/src/nspluginwrapper-1.3.0/src/npw-wrapper.c:3160):invoke_NP_Initialize: assertion failed: (rpc_method_invoke_possible(g_rpc_connection))
tried to install aur/nspluginwrapper-flash-prerelease 10.1.82.76-2 but i keep getting an error saying it's failed a validity check after the download :
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build nspluginwrapper-flash-prerelease
Offline
I think he was suggesting flashplugin-prerelease 10.3.162.29-2.
It's x86_64 native; running great on my machine.
Last edited by luciferin (2011-03-19 17:24:29)
Offline
yeah i got that....i had no joy after i installed that.
i got that message when running midori through console, so i had a stab at installing nspluginwrapper
flashplugin-prerelease and midori-git, or midori isnt working on my 64bit machine.
Last edited by yabasta (2011-03-19 18:05:24)
Offline
You get an nsplugin error with flashplugin-prerelease? That package doesn't use nspluginwrapper. Make sure you remove all other versions of flashplugin before installing the x86_64 one from AUR, as it looks like Midori is still trying to use the multilib version.
Offline
It looks like the nspluginwrapper is the problem. Does it help if you remove it?
To know or not to know ...
... the questions remain forever.
Offline
indeed it did! thank you so much for your help people
for a few minutes there i was considering having to use the horror of google-chrome...
much obliged.
Offline