there are now more than 400 registred users in this forum ... i was wondering how much they like archlinux .... please vote --- i want to see at least 200 votes, please
please vote only, if you are runing/had runing arch and know at least what
pacman -Suy do :-)
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
i like archlinux and thats final
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GU/ d- s: a- C L U P+ L+++ E--- W+
N 0+ K- W-- !O !M V-- PS+ PE- V++ PGP T 5 Z+ R* TV+ B+
DI-- D- G-- e-- h! r++ z+ z*
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
I think the poll is missing the option:
*) Its greate i really like it (maybe some comments on improvements?)
I do like it, a lot. But i think it has to grow.... although now its my primary distro and all, i wouldnt say its the best distro out there, neither that the installer its bad, i think its a greate distro, and the installer its ok, ofcourse it needs some polish up, but thats it i think... the problem with the "perfect" (or best) distro is that everybody has different needs, so i dont think there will be such title...
Anyway, like i sayd, i really like it and do it every day more.
Leonardo Andrés Gallego
www.archlinux-es.org || Comunidad Hispana de Arch Linux
Yeah I think its a very good distro...nice, fast and compact. Some of the voting choices could have been worded different though.
I'm thinking of installing it on my IBM TP 233mhz system also.
Drink Pepsi, the new generation, get Linux!
There is much to like about Arch and I think that it can carve a much larger niche in the crowded distro market. I compare it favorably to Slackware with swaret. Once configured, there are few differences between them. Configuration is similar but performed differently. The init system in both are simple and straighforward by design. Slack users that have an itch to scratch would do well to try Arch.
My primary concern is what will happen a few years down the road. Will Arch achieve a critical mass of committed users that will ensure its survival? With so few developers/packagers, can the effort stand the loss of a key member or two? Slack could lose Patrick tomorrow and still probably survive for another 10 years IMHO.
On the suggestion front, can Synaptic be adapted to use the pacman repositories? As the number of packages available in Arch increases, the need for a GUI tool will increase.
While the idea of throwing more developers at a problem and making it easier is a popular one, sometimes you have to be careful about that. Just because you have more bodies doesn't mean that things will be easier. We're conscious of this problem and intentionally being aware of how we grow the developers. Without a group of developers that jive well, all you get is chaos.
I have discovered that all of mans unhappiness derives from only one source, not being able to sit quietly in a room
- Blaise Pascal
if it wasn't suiting my needs I woudn't be using it since 0.2
apt-get install arch
I like Arch's simplicity in the inits, pacman, and abs, vs my previous favorite, Gentoo, and definetly the i686 optimized binaries so I can have a new server up in minutes, without messing around with a PITA installer (ala Gentoo) or compiling for days, or living in RPMHell (ala Red Hat). I also run servers. Servers that are modern, definetly not looking for a distro that can run on my old pos. Which is why I chose Arch over Slackware.
I just hope Arch lasts for a long time and more people find it. Its a tad scary to run a distro in a mission critical environment with only 400 registered users on their bbs. But, Arch fit the bill so I'm giving it a go.
EDIT: I also like upgrades, just put the latest OpenSSH bug fix on, smooth as silk. Keep up the good work Judd & Friends!
cool sig line
I think it's the best distro there could be, but it needs to get bigger, so the package repositories have more packages.
And where were all the sportsmen who always pulled you though?
They're all resting down in Cornwall
writing up their memoirs for a paper-back edition
of the Boy Scout Manual.
Who's stopping you?
apt-get install arch
other than taking an arch newb like me forever to setup the basics (network, x, sound), it's the best linux distro i've tried (that says a lot, cause i've tried like 10).
I have tried "some" Distros too, but they have always been missing something...
Then i saw my Linux mentor was trying Arch well lets give it a go, nothing missing yet and installed it on like 3-4 different comps now...
God Bless all those that does work on this Distro:)
Dunix the new Devil amongst Devils
It's the best I've ever used. (this is my 3rd distro) I don't even want to try and use more distros, because I know that it will only be a disappointment.
Arch is great but IMHO it includes to small amount of packages ;/
Gnome - The weakest link!
Linux, *not* GNU/Linux!
Are you having a laugh? You are aren't you? What you can't find in the official reps, not much in my experience, you can either find in the TURs, a PKGBUILD on the forum or floating about in incoming - that register is ace. Failing all those you can build it yourself and if you can;t you have no-one to blame but yourself
---this is not really aimed at you Abaddon at all - just a general observation ---
If i had to find a fault in Arch it would be to say that it takes too long for new ideas to be implemented but that would be scraping the barrel
Failing all those you can build it yourself
I do it
My local repository includes:
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-15 23:36 amarok-unstable drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-22 13:59 aspell-pl drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-15 14:02 baghira drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-10-05 19:26 bittornado drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-03 16:27 cksvf drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-07-16 14:45 irssi-ssl drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-15 14:07 kasablanca drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-13 15:56 knifty drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-08-03 21:32 konverter drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-18 21:50 mythtv drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 104 2004-07-16 14:45 qtmame drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-28 18:51 qtorrent drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-08-24 00:43 scrot drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-07-23 14:57 showimg drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 272 2004-10-03 13:26 splashutils drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-11 16:12 torsmo drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-10-02 23:31 xawdecode drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-07-19 23:32 xawdecode-plugin drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-08-24 21:22 xmms-lirc drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 2004-09-18 15:41 xvidcap
Maybe I'll make this reposity availabe for arch community
Gnome - The weakest link!
Linux, *not* GNU/Linux!
archlinux is fucking great.
no other way to put it in needed
To err is human... to really foul up requires the root password.
So far it's my favourite. And I think there are more than enough packages... I prefer quality over quantity...
Wonder how this poll would do on forum.gentoo.org.
Probably not very well, considering that forum.gentoo.org doesn't exist. (It's 'forums.gentoo.org')
That said, I love Arch, and I'm almost never happy with any kind of software, so this is a quite rare occurance, mostly owing to the fact the Arch is typically exactly what I expect it to be, a Linux distro with the coolest pkg manager ever.
If you develop an ear for sounds that are musical it is like developing an ego. You begin to refuse sounds that are not musical and that way cut yourself off from a good deal of experience.
- John Cage
Well, I havent tryied out so many distros before this and it´s perfect for me. Hell I even named my pc after it, its called ....archelina. Dont u dare laugh. Anyway, im so faun of it so me and my working pal are probably goin to set up some pc with AL at work after some perfermance tests of course. However our goal is to replace our development environment from UNIX to something more cheaper. Anyway, I will send you some feedback how the performance test went later on...say after x-max, maybe earlier .
To all of you guys working with this distro, you doing a GREAT work, keep it up and dont let the bugs scare you.
This being my third distro, I'd have to say I like it quite a bit. Although I wouldn't call it the best one out there. Each distro has it's own niche...the only question is "What niche do you fall into?"
I have my primary server running SuSE 9.1 which I enjoy, but there's too much "fluff" with it. Its nice that the installer is easy to use and whatnot, but I want to control *all* the packages I install. That's where Arch comes in. I'm not new to linux, but I like the idea that I have more control over what is installed and what isn't.
Also, I'm moving all my server services (http, ftp etc...) off of the SuSE box onto my Arch box and making it (arch) my gateway/firewall as well.
Keep up the good work.
There's no option for "Great, I love Arch linux, but I don't think its the 'best' distro."
Which is what I'd choose.
It's the best Linux Distro I've ever had. I'm a BSD guy but I have to admit BSD for desktop sucks. So I needed a desktop to play games, jukebox, whatever. Mandrake and FC3 were out of the question. I had a Gentoo box and I REALLY liked it. But I didn't have time for the installer. I like to do Stage one. I then tried Ubuntu. Great but I'm not really a beginner. Arch was the best. I like how it tells you EXACTLY what's going in,and how big the packages are. Pacman is great. Oh yea and those timers when you do Pacman in Console, beautiful....