kde4 vs kdemod

nocentis · 2009-03-15 17:55:34

Welcome

Which KDE is more stable.
With the knowledge of what it is yet kdemod small community. Which version will be more failure-free, more user friendly?

Last edited by nocentis (2009-03-15 18:09:00)

mcmillan · 2009-03-15 19:26:36

I haven't used kde4 from extra, but I haven't seen any problems with the stability in the kdemod packages. The main advantage kdemod has right now is that it's more modular, so you only need to install parts that you want.

As for user-friendliness, there's not much different in the actual core packages, but there are some extra things kdemod has available, like arxin, shaman and some prepackaged plasmoids.

JawsThemeSwimming428 · 2009-03-15 22:03:59

Try KDEmod, I did and I love it. I have been running it for a few weeks and I have had no issues.

Dead Code · 2009-03-16 01:09:11

I have used both, there's no difference between the two. KDEmod provides some backports and some additional goodies which KDE doesn't. If you prefer a modular approach, KDEmod is a go else KDE

nocentis · 2009-03-16 11:53:32

ok thanks try kdemod
I have one questions , which version to choose kdemod-core or kdemod-extragear ?

Dinth · 2009-03-16 11:55:09

In kdemod-core you have core KDE programs, and in kdemod-extragear you have additional applications like digikam, plasmoids, etc. You should add both of them

nocentis · 2009-03-16 12:06:34

heh
But the setback thanks

nocentis · 2009-03-16 12:36:15

please delete

Last edited by nocentis (2009-03-16 12:38:33)

Arch Linux

#1 2009-03-15 17:55:34

kde4 vs kdemod

#2 2009-03-15 19:26:36

Re: kde4 vs kdemod

#3 2009-03-15 22:03:59

Re: kde4 vs kdemod

#4 2009-03-16 01:09:11

Re: kde4 vs kdemod

#5 2009-03-16 11:53:32

Re: kde4 vs kdemod

#6 2009-03-16 11:55:09

Re: kde4 vs kdemod

#7 2009-03-16 12:06:34

Re: kde4 vs kdemod

#8 2009-03-16 12:36:15

Re: kde4 vs kdemod

Board footer