You are not logged in.

#1 2011-07-30 17:26:24

padraic93
Member
Registered: 2011-07-28
Posts: 2

Exceptionally Newbish Question regarding AIF

I dual-boot with Windows 7 and I'm looking to make the move from Fedora to Arch.  My question is regarding the 'Setup Hard-Drives' step.

I want to use the 'Manually configure block devices, filesystems and mountpoints' t re-use my current setup by simply reformatting my existing Linux partitions. My question is what changes are written if I leave sda1,2 and 3 (my windows partitions and WinRE) as "raw->no-fs" .

(Side note: Peculiarly, trying to use cfdisk in the AIF gives an error about the first partition having an incomplete cylinder, but I can run cfdisk absolutely fine via Fedora. Is this related to my use of lvm?)
---

My current partitioning set-up is as follows (fdisk -l).

Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x34d6cace

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1            2048    31459327    15728640   27  Hidden NTFS WinRE
/dev/sda2   *    31459328    31664127      102400    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3        31664128   765667327   367001600    7  HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4       765667328  1465147391   349740032    5  Extended
/dev/sda5       765671424   766695423      512000   83  Linux
/dev/sda6       766697472  1448364031   340833280   8e  Linux LVM
/dev/sda7      1448366080  1465143295     8388608   82  Linux swap / Solaris

Disk /dev/mapper/vg_padraic-LogVol00: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 5221 cylinders, total 83886080 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Disk /dev/mapper/vg_padraic-LogVol00 doesn't contain a valid partition table

Disk /dev/mapper/vg_padraic-LogVol01: 306.0 GB, 306049974272 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 37208 cylinders, total 597753856 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Disk /dev/mapper/vg_padraic-LogVol01 doesn't contain a valid partition table.
---

Offline

#2 2011-08-01 05:05:18

Foxhead
Member
Registered: 2010-12-23
Posts: 27

Re: Exceptionally Newbish Question regarding AIF

Leaving the option as raw->no-fs won't make any changes to that partition, also if your not really used to a text based install you could just use a gparted live cd to reformat your drive.

Offline

#3 2011-08-03 19:47:46

darkbeanies
Member
Registered: 2009-01-14
Posts: 142

Re: Exceptionally Newbish Question regarding AIF

The "raw -> no-fs" description sounds like complete rubbish to me and nearly caused me to sh*t myself the first time this showed up on the install cd.  What's wrong with "no changes" or something like that?  "raw/no-fs" sounds to me like it's about to nuke my partition.  Unless, of course, someone has a marvelous explanation about how really, raw/no-fs is a much more accurate description of what's about to happen...

Offline

#4 2011-08-03 20:57:47

karol
Archivist
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 25,440

Re: Exceptionally Newbish Question regarding AIF

darkbeanies wrote:

The "raw -> no-fs" description sounds like complete rubbish to me and nearly caused me to sh*t myself the first time this showed up on the install cd.  What's wrong with "no changes" or something like that?  "raw/no-fs" sounds to me like it's about to nuke my partition.  Unless, of course, someone has a marvelous explanation about how really, raw/no-fs is a much more accurate description of what's about to happen...

Have you talked to releng team about this? You may be right, but this needs to get to the devs.

Offline

#5 2011-08-03 21:56:01

darkbeanies
Member
Registered: 2009-01-14
Posts: 142

Re: Exceptionally Newbish Question regarding AIF

Well, no...I thought someone must have thought that "raw->no fs" was a great description of what was about to take place.  Or maybe, a clever trick to scare away the noobies!  Much like the whole installation process, in fact!  To be honest, I have no idea what "releng" means, though I suppose I could google it...

Oh.."release engineering"...for FreeBSD?  Shome mishtake, shurely?

Anyway, I'll get right on it...

Offline

#6 2011-08-03 22:08:13

karol
Archivist
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 25,440

Re: Exceptionally Newbish Question regarding AIF

Yes, 'releng' stands for release engineering. We have e.g. 'Releng Testbuild Feedback' link on the front page (to save space) that takes you to 'Release Engineering Testbuild Results'.
The shorthand is used for the mailing list http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-releng/ and in the url http://releng.archlinux.org/

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB