You are not logged in.
xD
well, I think we'll get it soon enough
Offline
first:new kernel is better than old one included many exciting features
second:to many drivers of new kernel are expected by too many users of arch linux
last: anyone with a calm/cool brain won't use ext4 filesystem for important data but can try it
the final offical iso of fedora 9(13 May 2008) ubuntu 8.04(24 April 2008) gentoo 2008 (when?) are not released yet
and developers of arch linux done a hard work,we can see in test package
if time permitted ,I think new kernerl can be in final offical iso !
just a litter newer than fedora9 ubuntu8.04 gentoo!
Last edited by silver (2008-04-18 07:35:28)
Offline
OMG hwy is Arch so slwo at the updlate!!!!!
What does it matter which kernel is on the ISO? Do you guys do a reinstall daily, or what? And doing a tit-for-tat on brain0's comments (one of our kernel maintainers!) is surely the best way to get 2.6.25 released. I bet he loves the positive feedback.
I see your point that it is pathetic to whine about not having the kernel in the ISO when Arch is indeed rolling release, but I have to state, that it would be a great thing to have anyway.
Upon doing a reinstall, I am heavily relying on the install ISO and if the kernel version is somehow outdated, it could be a struggle do deal with hardware, lacking support in the 'old' kernel. Feature-wise it would be a better experience to have the new kernel right out of the box when installing on some machine which has not got internet connection at first. The moment, I have access to a broadband internet connection, this argument is going down as I can update painlessly. But still, I wanted to point this out.
The lack of proper testing is the reason why kernel releases are not applied on the fly, isn't it?
Regards,
cg
celestary
Intel Core2Duo E6300 @ 1.86 GHz
kernel26
KDEmod current repository
Offline
Err... more seriously than my last post... you guys /do/ know that our ISO release schedule has been tied to the kernel release schedule since we switched to YYYY.MM versioning, right?
EDIT: whether or not that was followed, I won't venture to find out right now, but that's what we agreed it was supposed to be... a year ago.
The suggestion box only accepts patches.
Offline
I just wonder when will linux have something like iotop.
That's a feature I have been longing for.
Some PKGBUILDs: http://members.lycos.co.uk/sweiss3
Offline
Err... more seriously than my last post... you guys /do/ know that our ISO release schedule has been tied to the kernel release schedule since we switched to YYYY.MM versioning, right?
No,just the release date of kernel2.6.25 and arch 2008.04 is so near ! So why not included incidentally?
For rolling release, the users who keep updating don't need new iso? but benefit for those still install uncomfortably!
Offline
I just wonder when will linux have something like iotop.
That's a feature I have been longing for.
There's been per-process io accounting in linux since 2.6.20, ne?
Offline
Is tpowa going to upgrade the kernel26 package?
Use the Source, Luke!
Offline
sweiss wrote:I just wonder when will linux have something like iotop.
That's a feature I have been longing for.There's been per-process io accounting in linux since 2.6.20, ne?
Could not run iotop as some of the requirements are not met:
- Python >= 2.5 for AF_NETLINK support: Found
- Linux >= 2.6.20 with I/O accounting support: Not found
Such a shame.
I really don't like starting to compile kernels :\
Last edited by sweiss (2008-04-19 10:43:54)
Some PKGBUILDs: http://members.lycos.co.uk/sweiss3
Offline
Could not run iotop as some of the requirements are not met: - Python >= 2.5 for AF_NETLINK support: Found - Linux >= 2.6.20 with I/O accounting support: Not found
Such a shame.
I really don't like starting to compile kernels :\
I ran into the same problem today, but I have no idea where that kernel option is.
Offline
sweiss wrote:Could not run iotop as some of the requirements are not met: - Python >= 2.5 for AF_NETLINK support: Found - Linux >= 2.6.20 with I/O accounting support: Not found
Such a shame.
I really don't like starting to compile kernels :\I ran into the same problem today, but I have no idea where that kernel option is.
Offline
Upon doing a reinstall, I am heavily relying on the install ISO and if the kernel version is somehow outdated, it could be a struggle do deal with hardware, lacking support in the 'old' kernel. Feature-wise it would be a better experience to have the new kernel right out of the box when installing on some machine which has not got internet connection at first. The moment, I have access to a broadband internet connection, this argument is going down as I can update painlessly. But still, I wanted to point this out.
Regards,
cg
Remastering the install cd to include whatever kernel you like isn't that hard. All the tools are at your disposal, and the documentation on how to do so are also freely available.
Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest
Offline