You are not logged in.
Hi all,
with the recent vim upgrade I have notified a couple of package maintainers that they would have to move some vim support files that are in their packages (e.g. syntax highlighting) out of /usr/share/vim/syntax and similar into subdirectories. However, I'm afraid I might have suggested something wrong there: My suggestion was that they be put in /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax and so on, but Pierre has already updated his cmake package (bugreport) and moved it into /usr/share/vim/vim72/syntax etc.
Since I've also seen similar discussions at least in the latexsuite package (now removed since the packages have been renamed), and so I wonder what is the difference resp. the Archlinux policy with regard to those two directories: /usr/share/vim/vim72 vs. /usr/share/vim/vimfiles. (Personally, I thought that the vim72 subdirectory is for the distribution of vim itself, whereas distribution-specific stuff would go to the vimfiles subdirectory. - That's where the latex-suite package's files are now, too.)
Anyone with more sound reasoning or an insight into some quasi-"official" view on the question?
TIA,
Andreas
Offline
Based upon my reading of the vim documentation and personal preference, I'd say that files distributed with vim belong in $VIMRUNTIME (e.g. $VIM/vim72) and other/extra/modified system-wide files belong in $VIM/vimfiles, where $VIM in Arch is /usr/share/vim. (For the sake of completeness: user-specific files go in $HOME/.vim)
Offline
Actually the bug report asked to move from /usr/share/vim to /usr/share/vim/vimfiles
So I am confused..
Edit : ok I see now : http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/c … 3&r2=52345
Pierre moved from /usr/share/vim to /usr/share/vim/vim72 instead.
Last edited by shining (2009-10-08 11:13:01)
pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))
Offline