You are not logged in.

#1 2008-02-05 18:17:22

Blind
Member
From: Desert mountain
Registered: 2005-02-06
Posts: 386

mplayer security issues

We should update mplayer:
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/news.html
There are several severe security issues in mplayer 1.0RC2.

Cheers,
Blind

Offline

#2 2008-02-05 18:23:21

Gilneas
Member
From: Netherlands
Registered: 2006-10-22
Posts: 320

Re: mplayer security issues

1.0R2 is in arch. These new bugfixes need yet be put in a source package.

Offline

#3 2008-02-05 18:38:04

shining
Pacman Developer
Registered: 2006-05-10
Posts: 2,043

Re: mplayer security issues

This doesn't belong to the forums, but to the bug tracker : http://bugs.archlinux.org


pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))

Offline

#4 2008-02-05 19:29:20

Blind
Member
From: Desert mountain
Registered: 2005-02-06
Posts: 386

Re: mplayer security issues

Well, it has been flagged out of date.
Should be enough, hopefully.
Just wanted to point this out.
Cheers,
Blind

Offline

#5 2008-02-05 19:40:02

shining
Pacman Developer
Registered: 2006-05-10
Posts: 2,043

Re: mplayer security issues

Out of date, what? It isn't out of date, last release is still 1.0rc2.
And no, it is not enough. If you want to do this correctly, report it on the bug tracker as I already said.


pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))

Offline

#6 2008-02-05 19:43:09

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,942

Re: mplayer security issues

It was flagged by mistake around a month ago. Premonition?

Offline

#7 2008-02-05 20:11:29

Blind
Member
From: Desert mountain
Registered: 2005-02-06
Posts: 386

Re: mplayer security issues

Relax man, I didn't flag it out-of-date...

I assumed that it was flagged because of this security issue, though.
In any case, if the dev hasn't picked it up from there, I have my doubts they will react to a bug report.
In any case, I will file a report later, if I get to it.

Don't jump all over me.
Cheers,
Blind

PS:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9474

Last edited by Blind (2008-02-05 20:15:52)

Offline

#8 2008-02-05 20:20:38

tomk
Forum Fellow
From: Ireland
Registered: 2004-07-21
Posts: 9,839

Re: mplayer security issues

Blind wrote:

In any case, if the dev hasn't picked it up from there, I have my doubts they will react to a bug report.

Here's the difference - we don't always have time to read the forum. We do, however, make a point of evaluating every bug report posted. The bugtracker also provides a more structured way of communicating, discussing and tracking issues.

Offline

#9 2008-02-05 20:26:46

Blind
Member
From: Desert mountain
Registered: 2005-02-06
Posts: 386

Re: mplayer security issues

Well, I understand, and it sounds alright to me.
I shouldn't have assumed it was flagged out of data today because of the security issues. That assumption was based on:
1. I know the dev gets an email, when things are flagged out of date, thus allowing for a direct notification, maybe quicker action (when the comment says: security problem)?
2. Why wasn't it unflagged, when this happened a moth ago?

Alright, next time I will go right ahead to the bugtracker.

Cheers,
Blind

Offline

#10 2008-02-05 21:50:27

shining
Pacman Developer
Registered: 2006-05-10
Posts: 2,043

Re: mplayer security issues

Perfect, thanks. Now your task as an user is done, and we let the dev worry about it smile


pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))

Offline

#11 2008-02-05 21:58:28

yabbadabbadont
Member
Registered: 2008-01-19
Posts: 22

Re: mplayer security issues

I would assume that the devs would be subscribed to the security lists for the packages that they maintain.  Is this not generally the case with Arch?

(I'm not trolling.  I'm genuinely interested in the information.)

Offline

#12 2008-02-06 00:26:44

Blind
Member
From: Desert mountain
Registered: 2005-02-06
Posts: 386

Re: mplayer security issues

I guess they do. On the other hand, they usually have LOTS of packages at their hands...
I give the dev a lot of credit, 'cause mplayer is a b*&ch to compile.
But it is the best player/encoder there is, imho.

Cheers,
Blind

Offline

#13 2008-02-13 05:49:46

jason
Member
From: /dev/null
Registered: 2003-01-13
Posts: 102

Re: mplayer security issues

There used to be a security group for Archlinux.  I wonder what happened.  I wouldn't mind helping out if there is a need for a security group again.

Offline

#14 2008-02-18 23:31:53

yabbadabbadont
Member
Registered: 2008-01-19
Posts: 22

Re: mplayer security issues

The mplayer package in Extra has still not been patched with the latest security updates even though they were released almost a month ago.

What is even worse, is that the PKGBUILD in cvs for mplayer uses an ftp url in the source array that requires a non-anonymous login... so makepkg cannot download the sources.  Someone dropped the ball on this one.

Offline

#15 2008-02-18 23:54:22

fwojciec
Member
Registered: 2007-05-20
Posts: 1,411

Re: mplayer security issues

Personally I don't really think it's such a huge issue -- but what do I know...  Anyways, I've made a PKGBUILD that should take care of those security issues in case anyone feels really strongly about this.

# $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.15 2008/01/01 12:18:31 andyrtr Exp $
# Maintainer: Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org>
pkgname=mplayer
pkgver=1.0rc2
pkgrel=3
pkgdesc="A movie player for linux"
arch=(i686 x86_64)
depends=('libxxf86dga' 'libxv' 'libmad' 'libungif' 'cdparanoia' 'gtk2'
         'sdl' 'lame' 'libtheora' 'xvidcore'
         'libgl' 'smbclient' 'aalib' 'jack-audio-connection-kit'
         'x264>=20070616' 'faac' 'lirc-utils')
license=('GPL')
url="http://www.mplayerhq.hu/"
makedepends=('libcaca' 'unzip' 'live-media' 'libdca')
backup=('etc/mplayer/codecs.conf' 'etc/mplayer/input.conf')
source=(http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/MPlayer-${pkgver}.tar.bz2
        ftp://ftp1.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/skins/Blue-1.7.tar.bz2
        http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/patches/stream_cddb_fix_20080120.diff
        http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/patches/url_fix_20080120.diff
        http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/patches/demux_mov_fix_20080129.diff
        http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/patches/demux_audio_fix_20080129.diff)
        #MPlayer-1.0rc1-gnome-screensaver.patch)
md5sums=('7e27e535c2d267637df34898f1b91707'
         'e4e2020d11b681aac898103b3ba723c4'
         'c7d1bcdd61fcceb7598d61fe2213c587'
         '6a2c124586e1e6c44ae4ca1b4be9b6e4'
         'ce999929155f509a3e6bee41d9d613ed'
         '320af7daa1b248ee8e8c15d34d7923e3')

build() {
  cd $startdir/src/MPlayer-${pkgver}

  # Custom CFLAGS break the mplayer build
  unset CFLAGS

  # Add support for gnome screensaver
  #patch -p1 -i ../MPlayer-1.0rc1-gnome-screensaver.patch || return 1
  patch -Np0 -i ../stream_cddb_fix_20080120.diff || return 1
  patch -Np0 -i ../url_fix_20080120.diff || return 1
  patch -Np0 -i ../demux_mov_fix_20080129.diff || return 1
  patch -Np0 -i ../demux_audio_fix_20080129.diff || return 1

  cd $startdir/src/MPlayer-${pkgver}

  ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-gui --disable-arts --enable-x11 \
      --enable-runtime-cpudetection --confdir=/etc/mplayer --disable-nas \
      --enable-gl --enable-tv-v4l1 --enable-tv-v4l2 --enable-largefiles \
      --disable-liblzo --disable-speex --disable-openal \
      --disable-fribidi --disable-libdv --disable-musepack \
      --language=all --disable-dvdnav --disable-esd --disable-mga \
      --with-extraincdir=/usr/lib/live-media

  [ "$CARCH" = "i686" ] &&  sed 's|-march=i486|-march=i686|g' -i config.mak

  make || return 1
  make -j1 DESTDIR=${startdir}/pkg install
  cp etc/{codecs.conf,input.conf,example.conf} ${startdir}/pkg/etc/mplayer/
  ln -s /usr/share/fonts/TTF/Vera.ttf ${startdir}/pkg/usr/share/mplayer/subfont.ttf
  rm -rf ${startdir}/pkg/usr/share/mplayer/font
  mv ${startdir}/src/Blue ${startdir}/pkg/usr/share/mplayer/skins/default
}

Offline

#16 2008-02-18 23:58:48

yabbadabbadont
Member
Registered: 2008-01-19
Posts: 22

Re: mplayer security issues

Looks almost identical to the one I have building now...  great minds I guess.  big_smile

I added more error checking and some informative messages.  I didn't include the "-N" option with patch, just "-p0".  I guess it is safer to include it.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB