You are not logged in.
There was a review of the Equinox Desktop Environment (EDE) put up recently, and I figured it might be worth taking a look at. However, it isn't up on AUR yet. Could someone make a PKGBUILD for it?
Review: http://www.osnews.com/story/19782/Revie … onment_1.2
Website: http://equinox-project.org/
Offline
Has been in AUR very long time. Someone deleted it.
efltk
# Contributor: Leslie P. Polzer <polzer@stardawn.org>
# http://blog.viridian-project.de/
pkgname=efltk
pkgver=2.0.7
pkgrel=2
pkgdesc="Extended version of the GUI toolkit FLTK. EDE dependency."
url="http://ede.sf.net/"
license=('LGPL')
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
depends=(libjpeg libpng gcc-libs libxext)
source=(http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ede/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('f0300fd2fec47d4b05823297032ddb9f')
sha1sums=('b5a4911414e7d933df5e339dab34c7a18a691736')
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--enable-opengl --enable-utf8 --enable-plugins \
--disable-mysql --disable-unixODBC # EDE doesn't need this,
# and you probably do not either
./emake || return 1
mkdir -p $startdir/pkg/usr/{bin,lib}
./emake prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr install
find $startdir/pkg -name "*.la" -exec rm -f '{}' \;
}
ede
# Contributor: Leslie P. Polzer <polzer@stardawn.org>
# http://blog.viridian-project.de/
pkgname=ede
pkgver=1.2
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="The lightweight Equinox Desktop Environment"
url="http://ede.sf.net/"
license=('GPL')
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
depends=("efltk")
source=(http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ede/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('7bffdd825c6a32f3c99e081f2e3a4c73')
sha1sums=('3ed41a5382c6374ba2c9d8b6fff88e26205c5a0f')
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname
./configure --prefix=/usr
make || return 1
mkdir -p $startdir/pkg/usr/bin
make prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr LOCALEDIR=$startdir/pkg/usr/share/locale install
find $startdir/pkg -name "*.la" -exec rm -f '{}' \;
}
Offline
Man, why does it look like windows 98 ?
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
I got a build failure on the efltk package:
/tmp/yaourt-tmp-falcata/aur-efltk/efltk/src/efltk/lib/libefltk.so.2.0: undefined reference to `copy_row'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [efluid] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-falcata/aur-efltk/efltk/src/efltk/tools/efluid'
make[1]: *** [programs] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/yaourt-tmp-falcata/aur-efltk/efltk/src/efltk/tools'
make: *** [all] Error 2
==> ERROR: Build Failed.
Aborting...
Error: Makepkg was unable to build efltk package.
Offline
Man, why does it look like windows 98 ?
I guess that's the answer:
If you like innovative user interfaces like tiling window managers, you won't be happy with EDE. Its focus is on being a conservative lightweight environment.
Have you Syued today?
Free music for free people! | Earthlings
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." -- A. de Saint-Exupery
Offline
I got a build failure on the efltk package:
same to me
Offline
Well I did not write it her, but efltk builds for some time now.
Two of the patches from zlopi's link were already applied, the third one does not harm. I applied all of them in the AUR package, but I do not want to maintain the two packages.
The problem with ede is that it needs someone who really likes it and does some finetuning regarding usability and eyecandy.
To me the upstream project seems to be dead and there is nearly no documentation.
Offline