You are not logged in.
Hi!
Installed arch linux a few days back, hoping it would a fast lightweight system, however I only get 8-7k FPS with glxgears!
In a Ubuntu instalation that I have I get 28k FPS! And Ubuntu is (supposedly) heavier than arch...
Does anybody hava an idea of what may be causing this? Some option o xorg.conf maybe? Or some bad driver?
EDIT:
My specs:
Intel C2D E6420 @ 3200Ghz
eVGA 8800GTS KO ACS3
2x1Gb Corsair XMS2 @ 800Mhz
Seagate Barracuda SATA II 320Gb 7200rpm
nvidia v173.14.12 driver from the /i686/extra/ repository
Last edited by saz (2008-10-03 15:48:04)
Offline
Hi!
Installed arch linux a few days back, hoping it would a fast lightweight system, however I only get 8-7k FPS with glxgears!
In a Ubuntu instalation that I have I get 28k FPS! And Ubuntu is (supposedly) heavier than arch...
Does anybody hava an idea of what may be causing this? Some option o xorg.conf maybe? Or some bad driver?
You haven't given us any useful information like what graphics card you have, what drivers and their versions you have installed, etc. We're not psychic!
Offline
saz wrote:Hi!
Installed arch linux a few days back, hoping it would a fast lightweight system, however I only get 8-7k FPS with glxgears!
In a Ubuntu instalation that I have I get 28k FPS! And Ubuntu is (supposedly) heavier than arch...
Does anybody hava an idea of what may be causing this? Some option o xorg.conf maybe? Or some bad driver?
You haven't given us any useful information like what graphics card you have, what drivers and their versions you have installed, etc. We're not psychic!
Speak for yourself...pffft
Me too, I used to get a lot of FPS in Ubuntu, but not in Arch for some reason :S
I have 8800gt with nvidia drivers from nvidia site.
Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.
Offline
i only got 2k
geforce 7300
诚朴雄伟,励学敦行
Offline
I have the same problem
My configuration
Dell Vostro 1500
C2D T7300 2GHz
GeForce 8600 GT 256 MB
1440x900
xorg.conf genereted by nvidia-xconfig and nvidia-settings
bash-3.2# pacman -Qs nvidia
local/nvidia 173.14.12-3
NVIDIA drivers for kernel26.
local/nvidia-utils 173.14.12-1
NVIDIA drivers utilities and libraries.
bash-3.2# glxgears
13568 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2707.279 FPS
13545 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2703.456 FPS
13545 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2698.879 FPS
I thing that is to slow for my video card.
Offline
this is what I got. I have no idea what ubuntu would say (it never touched this computer), but
glxgears
8746 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1749.093 FPS
9069 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1809.382 FPS
9084 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1816.780 FPS
yaourt -Qs nvidia
extra/nvidia 173.14.12-3
NVIDIA drivers for kernel26.
extra/nvidia-utils 173.14.12-1
NVIDIA drivers utilities and libraries.
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 8500 GT (rev a1)
plays regnum fine though
Last edited by theringmaster (2008-10-04 16:31:14)
Check me out on twitter!!! twitter.com/The_Ringmaster
Offline
plays regnum fine though
Regnum Online?
Its a cpu bound game, not the best way to test your video card.
I have the same problem
My configuration
Dell Vostro 1500
C2D T7300 2GHz
GeForce 8600 GT 256 MB
1440x900xorg.conf genereted by nvidia-xconfig and nvidia-settings
I have a 7500le (le stands for light edition)
And i get this.
13121 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2624.159 FPS
13329 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2665.669 FPS
13516 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2703.039 FPS
13516 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2703.153 FPS
13515 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2702.977 FPS
13510 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2701.819 FPS
13514 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2702.800 FPS
Yes.. *i think* you should more fps.. anyway you should never use glxgears as a benchmark.
You could use nexuiz instead.
Make sure you dont force vsync both in the nvidia-settings and in nexuiz settings. There's a bug that kills your fps if you enable it in both places. Not sure about other games.
Offline
Glxgears is not a benchmark. I repeat. Glxgears is not a benchmark.
If you noticed a speed decrease from Ubuntu in 3D applications or compiz that's another story, but if we are just talking abou the fps just forget it.
Your source for video guides!
My Linux reviews.
Currently using: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 3.5GHz, 2GB RAM, Asus P5E, nVidia Geforce 8800GTS, Arch Linux
Offline
What is glxgears used for? It too seems to be way slower on my Arch setup (~2800 FPS) than Ubuntu (~6000) as well, but I certainly can't really tell performance-wise so I never worried about it.
Offline
I think I might be having a real problem...
Failed to initialize TTM buffer manager. Falling back to classic.
369 frames in 5.0 seconds = 73.794 FPS
375 frames in 5.0 seconds = 74.838 FPS
I have a integrated intel card (945G) and glxgears gave me about 1000 FPS before xserver 1.5 and xf86-video-intel 2.4.x
And where were all the sportsmen who always pulled you though?
They're all resting down in Cornwall
writing up their memoirs for a paper-back edition
of the Boy Scout Manual.
Offline
*shurgs* I don't know if this helps for sure, but since you are using intel, issue in your terminal:
[andrew@Aprz ~]$ export INTEL_BATCH=1
If there is a noticeable improvement in FPS, which there should be, then put it in ~/.bashrc.
[andrew@Aprz ~]$ sed -i '1 s/^/export\ INTEL_BATCH=1\n/g' ~/.bashrc
Which if you open up ~/.bashrc then you should notice "export INTEL_BATCH=1" at the beginning of the line. Miue looks like this:
export INTEL_BATCH=1
export MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1
alias ls='ls --color=auto'
PS1='[\u@\h \W]\$ '
Always like to have an excuse to use sed (probably would've been faster just to open up vi and type it in there myself, lol, but sed makes you feel cool).
Have you also checked the difference between opening glxgear as root between your non-root account. Sometimes, the problem could lie that your user is not in the video group like it should be:
[andrew@Aprz ~]$ sudo gpasswd -a andrew video
Since you have used Ubuntu then I am sure you know how to use sudo.
Hopefully you are using xf86-video-intel instead of xf86-video-vesa also. *shrugs* Just throwing stuff out there.
Last edited by Aprz (2008-10-05 09:57:55)
Offline
any thoughts for this problem? I find it really strange because it is a huuuuge difference (20k)... I'm afraid there is something wrong with my settings...
Offline
I have an 8800GTS too and I get ~6K, as I already told you these numbers mean nothing, they even change if you resize the window.
Your source for video guides!
My Linux reviews.
Currently using: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 3.5GHz, 2GB RAM, Asus P5E, nVidia Geforce 8800GTS, Arch Linux
Offline
afonic,
I realize that it isn't a benchmark, but I am just curious what the FPS numbers tell you at all. Certainly a 2-fold difference is at least a slight indication of something, isn't it?
Offline
I just think it's a huge difference from 28k to 8k...
Offline
It is a huge difference, and it deserves an answer. There's different xorg major versions (and of course patchsets - Ubuntu patches heavily) involved (xorg is a huge, complicated beast which has bugs of its own), plus the interesting rumour on the nvidia forum I vaguely remember seeing which questioned whether nvidia were having difficulty maintaining performance in their "unified" 173/177 drivers whilst supporting all the latest weird nvidia card models & sub-models.
Last edited by brebs (2008-10-06 18:20:23)
Offline
Thing is, I have both Ubuntu kai Arch. I have 24k fps in Ubuntu and 6k in Arch. But in Guild Wars I get around 80fps in both, so...
Your source for video guides!
My Linux reviews.
Currently using: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 @ 3.5GHz, 2GB RAM, Asus P5E, nVidia Geforce 8800GTS, Arch Linux
Offline
I have 24k fps in Ubuntu and 6k in Arch.
Cool, is this a dual-boot? You can be the guinea-pig
Which nvidia driver are they both using? Exact version, pretty please. Both 32-bit installations?
Which Ubuntu version? Which graphics card (8800GTS is not descriptive enough, e.g. the 640mb version is, just to confuse the heck out of us, slower than the more recent 512mb version)?
I'd also like to see the xorg.conf of both installations.
I suspect, based on my own little tests with a spare hard drive, that Nvidia's latest drivers cause the difference.
Offline
Can you people please use REAL benchmarks instead of glxgears. Unless you're noticing slow performance elsewhere, there's nothing wrong with your systems.
:?
Offline
If you read the posts, most of the people here acknowledge that glxgears isn't a benchmark. Simply repeating "glxgears is not a benchmark" has nothing to do with rsambuca's question and what brebs is trying to figure out.
Offline
Can you people please use REAL benchmarks instead of glxgears
No. This significant slowdown in glxgears is interesting and piques our curiosity.
If it bores you, then go to a different thread. Stop trying to earn brownie points from repeating the "glxgears is not a benchmark" mantra. Yes we know. Nobody's job or life depends on this.
Offline
When I have time I will run some glxgears non-benchmark tests. The distros I currently have installed are arch32bit, Ubuntu Gutsy 64bit, Ubuntu Hardy 32bit, and two other distros that I haven't touched in months.
Offline
Just for the record, I think we, who have intel cards, are pretty much screwed up for the time being (or doomed to compile tip versions): http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237468
Offline
Thanks to all who are saying "we know it's not a benchmark".. I've always been curious about glxgears performance, and have been hearing the "it's not a real benchmark" for years
though i always use it as one as soon as i install X on any computer.
currently i'm getting around 2.5k fps.. i've seen it go as low as 500 fps, as high as 3.1k fps. i have a quadcore q6600 @ 2.40ghz, geforce 9500 gt (512mb, 550mhz bus gpu and mem), 177.78 drivers (from aur, nvidia-beta and nvidia-utils beta), compiled with -march=core2, -j6)
on my older athlon xp 3200 (running at 1.5ghz unfortunately (chip is dying), with geforce 6800 (512mb), and i believe 177.1x driver (older), i get anywhere from 1.6k - 2.5k, so similar fps on both.
"I know what you're thinking, 'cause right now I'm thinking the same thing. Actually, I've been thinking it ever since I got here:
Why oh why didn't I take the BLUE pill?"
Offline
I just wish that some of these experts would answer our questions and tell us what glxgears actually does rather than just say "it isn't a benchmark", eventhough we already acknowledged that fact.
Offline