You are not logged in.

#151 2011-04-18 16:11:59

saschakb
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2011-04-12
Posts: 7
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Thanks to this thread, I was last thursday aware of wmfs - and I'm using it consequently since that day. I've setup it to my own wishes, just a last little thing is missing: the stack layout from wmii. Is there any chance, it might find it's way into wmfs?

Last edited by saschakb (2011-04-18 16:13:21)

Offline

#152 2011-04-18 16:45:02

sironitomas
Member
From: Cordoba, Argentina
Registered: 2009-11-28
Posts: 174
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

saschakb wrote:

Thanks to this thread, I was last thursday aware of wmfs - and I'm using it consequently since that day. I've setup it to my own wishes, just a last little thing is missing: the stack layout from wmii. Is there any chance, it might find it's way into wmfs?

Same thing to me. The only super uncomfortable bug of this WM is when you are in the MAX layout mode and you open a new window. That window will be send to the bottom of the clients layer, making you have to switch clients to see the recently opened window.

Last edited by sironitomas (2011-04-18 17:00:33)

Offline

#153 2011-04-19 10:02:24

bacardi55
Member
Registered: 2010-03-24
Posts: 25

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

saschakb wrote:

Thanks to this thread, I was last thursday aware of wmfs - and I'm using it consequently since that day. I've setup it to my own wishes, just a last little thing is missing: the stack layout from wmii. Is there any chance, it might find it's way into wmfs?

We are aware that this feature is wanted. I don't think that it will be done soon cause we are working already on a new layout. If i remember correctly, there is already a feature request about this stack layout.

sironitomas wrote:

Same thing to me. The only super uncomfortable bug of this WM is when you are in the MAX layout mode and you open a new window. That window will be send to the bottom of the clients layer, making you have to switch clients to see the recently opened window.

I'm aware of this bug and i'll try to fix it very soon.


Archlinux, wmfs and vim lover smile
dotfiles
wmfs contrib
Excuse my poor english, this ain't my mother tongue smile

Offline

#154 2011-04-19 18:09:58

sironitomas
Member
From: Cordoba, Argentina
Registered: 2009-11-28
Posts: 174
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

bacardi55 wrote:
sironitomas wrote:

Same thing to me. The only super uncomfortable bug of this WM is when you are in the MAX layout mode and you open a new window. That window will be send to the bottom of the clients layer, making you have to switch clients to see the recently opened window.

I'm aware of this bug and i'll try to fix it very soon.

Thanks! I'm being a little bit reiterative because that's the layout I most use in my netbook. The reolution is too small if I want to have multiple clients with any other layout. I'd be happy to make a patch but i'm not very good programming.

Regards!

Offline

#155 2011-04-19 22:18:25

saschakb
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2011-04-12
Posts: 7
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

@bacardi55 Well, for the sessions, where stacking is needed, I can switch, that's not the huge problem. For me, wmfs is 99% perfect! What more do I expect? smile

Offline

#156 2011-04-25 05:52:50

thayer
Fellow
From: Vancouver, BC
Registered: 2007-05-20
Posts: 1,560
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Can anyone clarify the purpose of, or difference between, the following options:

1. raisefocus
2. raiseswitch (I read this was deprecated in February, but it remains in the default wmfsrc)
3. client_tile_raise

Also, what is the purpose of focus_follow_movement?  It would seem that focus would *have* to follow movement, assuming 'movement' is the selection of clients by use of a shortcut (Mod+J, Mod+k, etc.).


thayer williams ~ cinderwick.ca

Offline

#157 2011-04-26 07:24:24

bacardi55
Member
Registered: 2010-03-24
Posts: 25

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

thayer wrote:

Can anyone clarify the purpose of, or difference between, the following options:

1. raisefocus
2. raiseswitch (I read this was deprecated in February, but it remains in the default wmfsrc)
3. client_tile_raise

Also, what is the purpose of focus_follow_movement?  It would seem that focus would *have* to follow movement, assuming 'movement' is the selection of clients by use of a shortcut (Mod+J, Mod+k, etc.).

raisefocus : true or false. Indicate if the window have to raise (go over the other) when it has the focus (when you have floating window)
raiseswitch : deprecated
client_tile_raise : true or false. Indicate if the tile client can raise over the floating window

focus_follow_movement: true or false. Indicate if the client under the mouse takes the focus


Archlinux, wmfs and vim lover smile
dotfiles
wmfs contrib
Excuse my poor english, this ain't my mother tongue smile

Offline

#158 2011-04-28 07:03:16

archangar
Member
From: France
Registered: 2011-04-28
Posts: 1

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Thanks for this marvelous WM, i enjoy WMFS everyday!

Offline

#159 2011-05-01 17:07:24

xunil9025
Member
Registered: 2011-02-26
Posts: 61

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

archangar wrote:

Thanks for this marvelous WM, i enjoy WMFS everyday!

I agree it's the best wm i've ever seen just amazing!
I tried some others (Awesome, Subtle) but they are crashing after updating.
Wmfs is a mix between openbox but with tiling and very light!

Last edited by xunil9025 (2011-05-01 17:08:20)

Offline

#160 2011-05-01 19:43:45

thayer
Fellow
From: Vancouver, BC
Registered: 2007-05-20
Posts: 1,560
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

bacardi55 wrote:
thayer wrote:

Can anyone clarify the purpose of, or difference between, the following options:

raisefocus : true or false. Indicate if the window have to raise (go over the other) when it has the focus (when you have floating window)
raiseswitch : deprecated
client_tile_raise : true or false. Indicate if the tile client can raise over the floating window

focus_follow_movement: true or false. Indicate if the client under the mouse takes the focus

Thanks, bacardi, that helped, but I am still unclear about focus_follow_movement.  The description you provided sounds more like focus_follow_mouse.  Can you or anyone else provide a bit more detail?


thayer williams ~ cinderwick.ca

Offline

#161 2011-05-02 13:56:48

xunil9025
Member
Registered: 2011-02-26
Posts: 61

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Hello,
I've saw this script
http://wmfs.info/attachments/13/scandesktop.sh
I need to add this line to generate applications menu.
# @include "~/.config/wmfs/wmfsrc-appmenu-items"
But it wont't work has anyone got a way to make it work?

Something like this image?

Read the rules about image posting --Inxsible

Does anyone know a way to generate applications menu?

Thank u!

Last edited by Inxsible (2011-05-02 14:06:10)

Offline

#162 2011-05-02 14:27:31

anonymous_user
Member
Registered: 2009-08-28
Posts: 3,059

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

First you don't need to include the beginning "#" so its just "@include "~/.config/wmfs/wmfsrc-appmenu-items". Secondly, you need to run the "scandesktop.sh" at startup such as ~/.xinitrc (if you use it).

Offline

#163 2011-05-02 15:48:02

xunil9025
Member
Registered: 2011-02-26
Posts: 61

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

I allready tried that but that didn't work.
When I add the line
"@include "~/.config/wmfs/wmfsrc-appmenu-items"  to wmfsrc items menu  and reload wmfs it falsback.

Last edited by xunil9025 (2011-05-02 15:49:21)

Offline

#164 2011-05-02 16:28:45

flamingmoe1979
Member
Registered: 2010-06-18
Posts: 4

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Hey first off all this is the best wm i used for linux so far ( i prefer floting wms). You did a great job.

Ive got a question concerning rules setting for libre office.

I use this rule but it doest work nicely.

[rule]
              instance      = "VCLSalFrame"       # First part of WM_CLASS
              class         = "libreoffice-startcenter"  # Seconf part of WM_CLASS, not needed if first part is correct
              screen        = 0          # Screen to use
              tag           = 5          # Tag number of apps
              free          = true       # Set automatic free client
[/rule]

Maybe someone has a better solution?
Greetz

Offline

#165 2011-05-02 16:35:47

anonymous_user
Member
Registered: 2009-08-28
Posts: 3,059

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

@flamingmoe1979 - try without using "instance". Also are you sure the class is correct?

Offline

#166 2011-05-02 17:20:31

flamingmoe1979
Member
Registered: 2010-06-18
Posts: 4

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

anonymous_user wrote:

@flamingmoe1979 - try without using "instance". Also are you sure the class is correct?

Im not definetly sure, i used xprop to check ou the wm class.  I try your suggestion!

The problem is when i try to open a document with the mouse the tag changes immediatly. Thats a strange behaviour.

Offline

#167 2011-05-02 18:47:58

bacardi55
Member
Registered: 2010-03-24
Posts: 25

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

flamingmoe1979 wrote:
anonymous_user wrote:

@flamingmoe1979 - try without using "instance". Also are you sure the class is correct?

Im not definetly sure, i used xprop to check ou the wm class.  I try your suggestion!

The problem is when i try to open a document with the mouse the tag changes immediatly. Thats a strange behaviour.

Unfortunatly, this is a known issue… http://wmfs.info/issues/28


Archlinux, wmfs and vim lover smile
dotfiles
wmfs contrib
Excuse my poor english, this ain't my mother tongue smile

Offline

#168 2011-05-03 08:23:32

xunil9025
Member
Registered: 2011-02-26
Posts: 61

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

xunil9025 wrote:

Hello,
I've saw this script
http://wmfs.info/attachments/13/scandesktop.sh
I need to add this line to generate applications menu.
# @include "~/.config/wmfs/wmfsrc-appmenu-items"
But it wont't work has anyone got a way to make it work?

Does anyone know a way to generate applications menu which reloads automatic?

Thank u!

Anyone?

Offline

#169 2011-05-06 17:52:27

thayer
Fellow
From: Vancouver, BC
Registered: 2007-05-20
Posts: 1,560
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

xunil9025 wrote:

I allready tried that but that didn't work.
When I add the line
"@include "~/.config/wmfs/wmfsrc-appmenu-items"  to wmfsrc items menu  and reload wmfs it falsback.

You need to run the script before reloading WMFS; as per the instructions inside the script:

# Application list
# Add the following line to your .wmfsrc in the appmenu's [item] list
# @include "~/.config/wmfs/wmfsrc-appmenu-items"
# then launch this script or make the .xinitrc do it

The script itself generates ~/.config/wmfs/wmfsrc-appmenu-items so it must be run before you load WMFS, else the @include will be invalid.


thayer williams ~ cinderwick.ca

Offline

#170 2011-05-18 11:58:28

cyrusza
Member
From: Italy
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 29
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Hi mates, i'm a new Arch user and thanks to all of your posts in this forum i achieved very good results in a little time.

My problem with wmfs (my tiling wm of choice) is that i need a lot of status indicator and i'm trying to put them in a second status bar in the bottom of the screen that doesn't overlap with windows. I tried with dzen2 but it seems that wmfs doesn't like the "-dock" parameter of dzen2. There's something i can do with wmfs to reserve a small region in the bottom of the screen or there are other tools around that can achieve a similar result (with wmfs, of course)?

Thank you!

Offline

#171 2011-05-23 18:40:23

saschakb
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2011-04-12
Posts: 7
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

At the moment, wmfs is eating up much too much cpu ressources. I made 3 screenshots of wmfs, wmii and fluxbox. All 3 wms running in idle mode. No background programs are running. Just take a look, at - how many full power cicles (2.3 MHz) wmfs needs in idle mode, compared to wmii or fluxbox. That of cause heatens up my notebook. For me, wmfs is the best of all wms, but at the moment, it consumes too much ressources and power.
wmfs: http://666kb.com/i/btqmc5mhfwc94bjwb.png
Fluxbox: http://666kb.com/i/btqmab3c3bg37eauz.png
wmii: http://666kb.com/i/btqmb4rzuq6wi7t6j.png

I'm using the most actual git version from AUR. If there are any ideas, how to fix that behaviour - that would be very welcome!

Thanks

Offline

#172 2011-05-23 18:52:12

karol
Archivist
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 25,440

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

saschakb wrote:

At the moment, wmfs is eating up much too much cpu ressources. I made 3 screenshots of wmfs, wmii and fluxbox. All 3 wms running in idle mode. No background programs are running. Just take a look, at - how many full power cicles (2.3 MHz) wmfs needs in idle mode, compared to wmii or fluxbox. That of cause heatens up my notebook. For me, wmfs is the best of all wms, but at the moment, it consumes too much ressources and power.
wmfs: http://666kb.com/i/btqmc5mhfwc94bjwb.png
Fluxbox: http://666kb.com/i/btqmab3c3bg37eauz.png
wmii: http://666kb.com/i/btqmb4rzuq6wi7t6j.png

I'm using the most actual git version from AUR. If there are any ideas, how to fix that behaviour - that would be very welcome!

Thanks

Sorry, but where's the number you're referring too? I'm a bit confused and I don't know what to look at on those screenshots.

Edit: Oh, do you mean 2.3 Ghz?

Last edited by karol (2011-05-23 18:53:28)

Offline

#173 2011-05-23 18:56:35

sironitomas
Member
From: Cordoba, Argentina
Registered: 2009-11-28
Posts: 174
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Is this bug (http://wmfs.info/issues/92) ever going to be so solved? More than a month ago, bacardi said the team will take care about this soon, but the bug in the project page isn't even assigned to anyone.

Thanks.

Last edited by sironitomas (2011-05-23 18:57:11)

Offline

#174 2011-05-23 19:07:22

saschakb
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2011-04-12
Posts: 7
Website

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

Yes, I was speaking about the 40%-50% 2.30 GHz in idle mode. That's much too much. For the moment - I return to wmii, waiting for a solution too this.

Offline

#175 2011-05-23 19:15:08

xorg62
Member
Registered: 2011-03-04
Posts: 1

Re: The WMFS Thread (Window Manager From Scratch)

sironitomas: https://github.com/xorg62/wmfs/commit/7 … 7b4d6af956
I began to work on it on active dev branch.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB