unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

holahmeds · 2015-07-08 21:42:41

The server shows the correct size but when I try to download it I get a bad file.

$ wget http://repo-ck.com/i686/linux-ck-pentm- … pkg.tar.xz
--2015-07-09 03:31:02-- http://repo-ck.com/i686/linux-ck-pentm- … pkg.tar.xz
Resolving repo-ck.com (repo-ck.com)... 97.74.158.128
Connecting to repo-ck.com (repo-ck.com)|97.74.158.128|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3745728 (3.6M) [application/x-xz]
Saving to: ‘linux-ck-pentm-4.0.7-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz’
linux-ck-pentm-4.0.7-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz 100%[=======================================================>] 3.57M 161KB/s in 28s
2015-07-09 03:31:31 (130 KB/s) - ‘linux-ck-pentm-4.0.7-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz’ saved [3745728/3745728]

graysky · 2015-07-08 22:44:54

Odd... downloads fine for me.

holahmeds · 2015-07-09 03:55:04

Strange..

When I check the http header on from two different pcs in my home I get:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
...
Content-Length: 3745728
Last-Modified: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:14:22 GMT
Content-Type: application/x-xz

But if I use http://web-sniffer.net/ to check the header the content-length is 57085620

And this only happens for the linux-ck-pentm package. I checked a few other packages and they are all fine.

graysky · 2015-07-12 10:24:25

Dunno what to tell you... does the 4.0.8-1 package come down ok for you?

holahmeds · 2015-07-12 10:27:58

graysky wrote:

Dunno what to tell you... does the 4.0.8-1 package come down ok for you?

Yep, it's all good.

kernelOfTruth · 2015-07-15 19:02:28

Do the lockups also occur for you with NUMA disabled + SMTNICE disabled ?

I remember that there were some initial issues with SMTNICE that got fixed with the addition of the final functionality - no ?

Unfortunately I can't remember anymore if it also was related to Btrfs & hardlocks

but I definitely remember that there were a few occurrences of hardlocks in combination with Btrfs and BFS in the past for me

progandy · 2015-07-19 19:16:54

Hello graysky,
would you consider building linux-gc by Alfred Chen for the 4.1 kernels if CK doesn't update his patches? It seems to contain a modified BFS, BFQ, intel-phc, the gcc patch and 3-4 other smaller changes.
https://github.com/cchalpha/linux-gc/tr … x-4.1.y-gc

graysky · 2015-07-19 19:24:09

@progandy - I only build the official ck1 patches into the kernels. You are welcome to do so though.

progandy · 2015-07-19 19:27:08

graysky wrote:

@progandy - I only build the official ck1 patches into the kernels. You are welcome to do so though.

Thanks. I am thinking about it and wanted to know if this would be a waste of my cpu cycles.

Last edited by progandy (2015-07-19 19:27:26)

Jristz · 2015-07-22 05:52:50

Virtual Box 5.0.0 man that was unespected.
I dont even remember hit testing.
But also I want ask if there a recomended filesystem for ck users or in teory all will perform like the same regardless filesystem?

pb · 2015-07-22 10:43:05

progandy wrote:

Hello graysky,
would you consider building linux-gc by Alfred Chen for the 4.1 kernels if CK doesn't update his patches? It seems to contain a modified BFS, BFQ, intel-phc, the gcc patch and 3-4 other smaller changes.
https://github.com/cchalpha/linux-gc/tr … x-4.1.y-gc

If you (or anybody else) prefer Chen's kernel line, there are scripts for build it in Arch Linux: http://www.archlike.darmowefora.pl/inde … 5.html#new (it's in Polish).
First you should download good config for it i.e. graysky's from AUR or from linux-bfq (I think both are the same) - just download linux-ck or linux-bfq from AUR. Delete all files exept config and config.x86_64. Copy PKGBUILD, linux-gc.install and linux-gc.preset code from webside above. Adjust PKGBUILD if you want and compile kernel. It works (I'm on it). So now, the version is corresponding to upstream's 4.1.2.
EDIT:
Ups, I forgot about one things. Graysky's patch, that used by Chen is for GCC =<4.8, then some Intel's users may have a problem or... use "native" flag.

Last edited by pb (2015-07-22 20:49:14)

Jristz · 2015-07-22 19:59:27

http://repo-ck.com/i686/
so its me or ck for i686 stoop updating??

graysky · 2015-07-22 21:01:15

Jristz wrote:

http://repo-ck.com/i686/
so its me or ck for i686 stoop updating??

Haven't pushed them to the repo yet. Soon.

EDIT: All packages are now ready for serving.

Last edited by graysky (2015-07-22 21:12:42)

graysky · 2015-07-22 21:01:56

EDIT: damn double post.

Last edited by graysky (2015-07-22 21:02:26)

Commander · 2015-07-24 13:32:06

Graysky, is there any updated kernel for gcc 5.2?

graysky · 2015-07-24 22:38:29

Commander wrote:

Graysky, is there any updated kernel for gcc 5.2?

4.0.9-2 has been rebuilt using the new gcc and will be online shortly.

orlfman · 2015-07-29 18:42:03

progandy wrote:

Hello graysky,
would you consider building linux-gc by Alfred Chen for the 4.1 kernels if CK doesn't update his patches? It seems to contain a modified BFS, BFQ, intel-phc, the gcc patch and 3-4 other smaller changes.
https://github.com/cchalpha/linux-gc/tr … x-4.1.y-gc

ck isn't updating his patch set anymore?

progandy · 2015-07-29 19:27:22

orlfman wrote:

ck isn't updating his patch set anymore?

I don't know. I think he will do it sometime when he feels like it. Maybe he still uses the 4.0.x kernel for his own system(s), so he has no need to update them at the moment. That is all speculation, though. All I know is that he hasn't published a patch for 4.1 yet.

graysky · 2015-07-29 19:32:44

progandy wrote:

orlfman wrote:
ck isn't updating his patch set anymore?
I don't know. I think he will do it sometime when he feels like it. Maybe he still uses the 4.0.x kernel for his own system(s), so he has no need to update them at the moment. That is all speculation, though. All I know is that he hasn't published a patch for 4.1 yet.

CK's blog wrote:

ck21 July 2015 at 11:25
Sure. Nothing's happened for 3.1, and no progress has been made on fixing the non-numa build bug. As usual when I start working on it I will finish working on it shortly afterwards, but so far I've been too busy to do anything.

keepitsimpleengineer · 2015-08-02 18:21:56

Yikes... .. .

[ljohnson@KISE-007 ~]$ sudo pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: broadcom-wl-ck-atom: requires linux-ck-atom<4.1

graysky · 2015-08-02 18:25:03

Hmm... did you `pacman -Syyu`?

EDIT: Wait a sec... the repo is still syncing. Try it again in a few min.
EDIT2: In sync. Should be good.

Last edited by graysky (2015-08-02 18:30:00)

runical · 2015-08-03 07:23:41

Hey all, I'm having some weird problems with the latest linux-ck-haswell kernel (4.1.3-1). The sound through the speakers no longer works. The speakers are not broken since it does work on the official kernel and on the previously installed ck kernel (4.0.9-1). Funnily enough, the headphones do work. I'm at a loss where to start debugging. Does anybody have tips?

keepitsimpleengineer · 2015-08-03 16:51:51

graysky wrote:

Hmm... did you `pacman -Syyu`?

Actually I use "yaourt -Syyuua" because I have so many AUR apps...

And I waited until next day to try again cause wasn't gonna need the computer that day...

Thanks again for all the good work... .. !

inglor · 2015-08-04 13:58:52

I'm having issue with latest linux-ck build from Aur. Kernel panic on shutdown [1]. I thought it was only me but another user confirmed the panic as well so its better to have it here.

[1]https://www.dropbox.com/s/1839hmmyqjn24 … 4.jpg?dl=0

kokonut · 2015-08-06 05:29:35

runical wrote:

Hey all, I'm having some weird problems with the latest linux-ck-haswell kernel (4.1.3-1). The sound through the speakers no longer works. The speakers are not broken since it does work on the official kernel and on the previously installed ck kernel (4.0.9-1). Funnily enough, the headphones do work. I'm at a loss where to start debugging. Does anybody have tips?

I am getting the exact same issue. For some reason if I shutdown, reboot, shutdown, reboot, then the sounds works again. It seems to break when switching between vanilla and CK, but after shutdown rebooting twice it continues to work. Very baffling.

EDIT: Okay, correction since I am testing linux-ck again. The reboot twice does NOT work. The answer is to have the system suspend once, and then it will work again, even across shutdowns as long as it is the same kernel. There must be a better explanation for this.

Last edited by kokonut (2015-08-06 05:45:51)

Arch Linux

#2476 2015-07-08 21:42:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2477 2015-07-08 22:44:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2478 2015-07-09 03:55:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2479 2015-07-12 10:24:25

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2480 2015-07-12 10:27:58

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2481 2015-07-15 19:02:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2482 2015-07-19 19:16:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2483 2015-07-19 19:24:09

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2484 2015-07-19 19:27:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2485 2015-07-22 05:52:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2486 2015-07-22 10:43:05

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2487 2015-07-22 19:59:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2488 2015-07-22 21:01:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2489 2015-07-22 21:01:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2490 2015-07-24 13:32:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2491 2015-07-24 22:38:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2492 2015-07-29 18:42:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2493 2015-07-29 19:27:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2494 2015-07-29 19:32:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2495 2015-08-02 18:21:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2496 2015-08-02 18:25:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2497 2015-08-03 07:23:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2498 2015-08-03 16:51:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2499 2015-08-04 13:58:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2500 2015-08-06 05:29:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer