unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

SanskritFritz · 2017-05-15 12:28:28

Ropid wrote:

You can compile a module yourself by using the "nvidia-dkms" package. You will have to remove the nvidia kernel module packages for all kernels you have installed, and you have to make sure that you have the "-headers" packages for all kernels installed.

Does that work with nvidia-304xx-ck too?

Ropid · 2017-05-16 13:10:52

You should try the "nvidia-340xx-dkms" package for that. I'd think the combination of nvidia-340xx-dkms + nvidia-340xx-utils works same as nvidia-dkms + nvidia-utils.

SanskritFritz · 2017-05-16 13:54:53

Ropid wrote:

You should try the "nvidia-340xx-dkms" package for that. I'd think the combination of nvidia-340xx-dkms + nvidia-340xx-utils works same as nvidia-dkms + nvidia-utils.

How could I miss that, I searched for nvidia-dkms in the hope I would find this package... thanks!

Jannis · 2017-05-17 14:09:52

glyocknob wrote:

Hi, so I have serious connection problems with the repository at GoDaddy and decided to setup a mirror. It's a server at online.net in Paris and should have enough bandwidth and fast enough connection. IPv6 is via he.net and should also work.
[repo-ck]
Server = http://repo-ck.segfault.gq/$arch
It's updated every hour at the moment.
I hope this is okay, if not contact me.
Have fun!

~~Unfortunately seems to be down now. I was getting really good speeds while it was working. Was the load too much?~~
Edit: Nevermind, seems to be back up.

Last edited by Jannis (2017-05-18 21:20:00)

graysky · 2017-05-19 22:23:16

Thanks to loqs in this thread am able to build the nvidia-xxx-ck drivers with some patches he linked so I went ahead and bumped the linux-ck series of packages in the AUR with a solicitation for feedback.

graysky wrote:

Notes: I need some feedback on the 4.11 release, specifically the extra packages such as nvidia-304xx-ck, nvidia-340xx-ck, broadcom-wl-ck, and virtualbox-ck modules. I have successfully build all of these but can only test nvidia-ck and virtualbox-ck since I do not have older nvidia hardware nor broadcom-wl hardware. Once I get some positive feedback, I will build up the 4.11.x series in [repo-ck] but for now, will hold. Also 4.11.2 is due out tomorrow.

I need to know these package work before building for [repo-ck] so will some users please build and test? Thanks.

I have verified:
[x] linux-ck
[x] nvidia-ck
[x] virtualbox-ck

So that leaves:
[ ] broadcom-wl-ck
[ ] nvidia-304xx-ck
[ ] nvidia-340xx-ck

Last edited by graysky (2017-05-19 22:23:34)

glitsj16 · 2017-05-20 01:46:47

graysky wrote:

Thanks to loqs in this thread am able to build the nvidia-xxx-ck drivers with some patches he linked so I went ahead and bumped the linux-ck series of packages in the AUR with a solicitation for feedback.
graysky wrote:
Notes: I need some feedback on the 4.11 release, specifically the extra packages such as nvidia-304xx-ck, nvidia-340xx-ck, broadcom-wl-ck, and virtualbox-ck modules. I have successfully build all of these but can only test nvidia-ck and virtualbox-ck since I do not have older nvidia hardware nor broadcom-wl hardware. Once I get some positive feedback, I will build up the 4.11.x series in [repo-ck] but for now, will hold. Also 4.11.2 is due out tomorrow.
I need to know these package work before building for [repo-ck] so will some users please build and test? Thanks.
I have verified:
[x] linux-ck
[x] nvidia-ck
[x] virtualbox-ck
So that leaves:
[ ] broadcom-wl-ck
[ ] nvidia-304xx-ck
[ ] nvidia-340xx-ck

Hi graysky, I'm currently building linux-ck-core2 & nvidia-340xx-ck-core2. Will report back as soon as I tested those. For other people who are willing to test nvidia-340xx-ck, it might be helpful to add a note to the current AUR page for nvidia-340xx-ck, as that still references kernel 4.10 instead of 4.11 in the PKGBUILD:

--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@

pkgname=nvidia-340xx-ck
pkgver=340.102
-_extramodules=extramodules-4.10-ck
+_extramodules=extramodules-4.11-ck
pkgrel=7
pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for linux-ck, 340xx legacy branch."
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://www.nvidia.com/"
-depends=('linux-ck>=4.10' 'linux-ck<4.11' 'libgl' "nvidia-340xx-utils=${pkgver}")
-makedepends=('linux-ck-headers>=4.10' 'linux-ck-headers<4.11' 'nvidia-340xx-libgl')
+depends=('linux-ck>=4.11' 'linux-ck<4.12' 'libgl' "nvidia-340xx-utils=${pkgver}")
+makedepends=('linux-ck-headers>=4.11' 'linux-ck-headers<4.12' 'nvidia-340xx-libgl')
conflicts=('nvidia-ck' 'nvidia-304xx-ck')
#groups=('ck-generic')
#replaces=()

Regards.

graysky · 2017-05-20 01:49:14

@glitsj16 - Fixed, dunno what heppened with my AUR upload.

glitsj16 · 2017-05-20 03:42:13

Hi graysky, confirming linux-ck-core2 / nvidia-340xx-ck-core2 builds went fine, looking good. Only one additional change needed for nvidia-340xx-ck. Line 37 should reference the correct name of the unfuck patch for kernel 4.11:

patch -Np1 -i "${srcdir}"/unfuck_4.11_for_340xx.patch

Thanks for all your work on providing these packages, much appreciated.

graysky · 2017-05-20 09:46:47

@glitsj - Right you are... corrected in -2.

monotykamary · 2017-05-23 16:29:33

I've always wondered and it might be in this thread somewhere, why isn't the ck patchset packaged in lrzip?

graysky · 2017-05-23 19:21:48

@monotykamary - It is: http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/4.0/4.11/4.11-ck1/ .. and it's 20% smaller than the corresponding xz'ed version

Last edited by graysky (2017-05-23 19:22:46)

raggerv8 · 2017-05-27 08:43:54

http://repo-ck.com/x86_64/repo-ck.db.sig 404

graysky · 2017-05-27 09:50:34

@raggerv8 - Works fine without repo sigs which aren't enabled in official repos either to my knowledge.

raggerv8 · 2017-05-27 09:52:35

graysky wrote:

@raggerv8 - Works fine without repo sigs which aren't enabled in official repos either to my knowledge.

Yeah, it seems to be working fine, I just get the error that it cannot be found when I use powerpill, no error with pacman, but it is missing, which I assume is unintentional?

graysky · 2017-05-27 10:02:07

I am not signing the repo index... to my knowledge many if not all of the official mirrors do not as well.

keepitsimpleengineer · 2017-07-11 12:49:18

WOW repo-ck.com & godaddy.com offline
12:30 UTC
---online 13:00 UTC

Last edited by keepitsimpleengineer (2017-07-11 13:02:15)

zaxdan69 · 2017-07-29 03:52:09

Hello,
I tried to update today and I get this error:

nvidia-ck-piledriver: install nvidia-utils (384.59-1) breaks dependency 'nvidia-utils=381.22'

How to fix this?

john29 · 2017-07-29 08:32:08

hello
same has
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-ck-piledriver: installing nvidia-utils (384.59-1) breaks dependency 'nvidia-utils=381.22'

graysky · 2017-07-29 11:12:36

I just need to update nvidia-ck but my home internet is down. Restoration time is late Sunday night EST.

SanskritFritz · 2017-07-29 13:30:11

I highly recommend using the nvidia-dkms package.

zaxdan69 · 2017-07-30 04:25:08

I tried to remove nvidia-ck-piledriver and install nvidia-dkms. Now I have these errors when updating initramfs:

ERROR: module not found: `nvidia'
==> ERROR: module not found: `nvidia_modeset'
==> ERROR: module not found: `nvidia_uvm'
==> ERROR: module not found: `nvidia_drm'

Also I get the error that dkms need kernel 4.11.9-1-ARCH headers to work.
Trying to install again nvidia-ck-piledriver I get similar error about nvidia-utils:

warning: unable to find "nvidia-utils=381.22", dependency of "nvidia-ck-piledriver"
:: unable to update the following package because of unmet dependencies:
      nvidia-ck-piledriver

EDIT:
Installing linux-headers solved the above errors, but now I cannot login to graphical enviroment with linux-ck kernel, It works only with default linux kernel.
So, can you give more information on how to use nvidia-dkms with linux-ck?

EDIT2:
Nevermind, I updated wrong initramfs image. After I update the correct linux-ck-piledriver worked with nvidia-dkms.

Last edited by zaxdan69 (2017-07-30 15:52:55)

loqs · 2017-08-14 19:09:22

@graysky the issue with 4.12 none booting this by any chance? If it is is ck working with upstream on it?

graysky · 2017-08-14 19:12:53

@loqs - CK recommended a config settings which I put into 4.12.7-1 (AUR). Can you try it and report back on the AUR page?

loqs · 2017-08-14 19:19:28

CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=y would fix the issue I encountered as well provided you do not override it with scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=0 or make sure the default elevator does not use the name of one of the mq elevators.

Scimmia · 2017-08-14 19:22:09

loqs wrote:

CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=y would fix the issue I encountered as well provided you do not override it with scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=0 or make sure the default elevator does not use the name of one of the mq elevators.

That was tried when Arch updated to 4.12. Caused some systems to hang on boot IIRC. Could be fixed by now, though.

Arch Linux

#3001 2017-05-15 12:28:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3002 2017-05-16 13:10:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3003 2017-05-16 13:54:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3004 2017-05-17 14:09:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3005 2017-05-19 22:23:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3006 2017-05-20 01:46:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3007 2017-05-20 01:49:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3008 2017-05-20 03:42:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3009 2017-05-20 09:46:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3010 2017-05-23 16:29:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3011 2017-05-23 19:21:48

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3012 2017-05-27 08:43:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3013 2017-05-27 09:50:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3014 2017-05-27 09:52:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3015 2017-05-27 10:02:07

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3016 2017-07-11 12:49:18

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3017 2017-07-29 03:52:09

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3018 2017-07-29 08:32:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3019 2017-07-29 11:12:36

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3020 2017-07-29 13:30:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3021 2017-07-30 04:25:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3022 2017-08-14 19:09:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3023 2017-08-14 19:12:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3024 2017-08-14 19:19:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3025 2017-08-14 19:22:09

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer