unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

MrCode · 2012-12-15 09:14:52

Welp, it appears it is the kernel…I installed the stock 3.7 kernel from testing and the exact same thing happened (except this time I got to see it panic; I switched out of graphical.target and stayed in tty1 for good measure ).

I guess I'm waiting for 3.8, then (or a patched 3.7).

Last edited by MrCode (2012-12-15 09:15:52)

graysky · 2012-12-15 09:46:03

graysky wrote:

1) Remove LMU and see if it happens after a reboot.

b9anders · 2012-12-15 10:42:15

graysky wrote:

@b9anders - Can you try the ARCH kernel from [testing] and see if it gives the same? Need to see if it's a 3.7 problem or a 3.7-ck1 problem.

I am kinda scared to. I like being able to fall back on a safe kernel when one doesn't work. Pulling in the testing kernel could leave me with no working kernels (and I don't currently have livecd-/usb to bail me out) if it's a 3.7 problem.

MrCode · 2012-12-16 01:20:09

graysky wrote:

1) Remove LMU and see if it happens after a reboot.

<sigh> I suppose this means I'll be waiting for one or the other, then…it doesn't happen after removing LMT.

(I was hesitant to try this at first because I was worried about having to restore configs, but everything was fine after reinstalling and merging the .pacsave backups of my config files.)

Last edited by MrCode (2012-12-16 01:21:26)

graysky · 2012-12-16 01:22:00

@MrCode - That's good... you have found the problem. It appears that there is a patch on lkml:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/146

MrCode · 2012-12-16 04:26:04

That's good... you have found the problem. It appears that there is a patch on lkml:

Awesome.

Apologies for dragging this thread off-topic.

ccpaging · 2012-12-17 13:23:41

Using kernel v3.7.0-1-ck , I notice the following WARN_ON() triggering with rt2500usb and no wireless interface appears.

[ 11.302224] WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:389 wiphy_register+0x5ad/0x5f0 [cfg80211]()
[ 11.302228] Hardware name: System Product Name
[ 11.302232] Modules linked in: reiserfs i2c_nforce2 rt2500usb(+) rt2x00usb rt2x00lib mac80211 i2c_core shpchp pci_hotplug cfg80211 rfkill r8169 mii joydev fuse usblp snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_via psmouse serio_raw snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer snd soundcore pcspkr evdev wmi processor coretemp microcode asus_atk0110 button ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache hid_logitech_dj hid_logitech ff_memless usbhid hid ohci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common sd_mod ahci libahci libata scsi_mod
[ 11.302315] Pid: 140, comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 3.7.0-1-ck #1

May need this patch?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1834921/

Last edited by ccpaging (2012-12-17 13:25:02)

graysky · 2012-12-17 15:26:16

@ccpaging - I don't wanna start applying unmerged patches to the package. Plz open a bug against the ARCH kernel if upstream isn't moving fast enough or consider build from AUR and adding to your personal copy.

WonderWoofy · 2012-12-18 04:09:57

Ooooooh, new kernel... thanks graysky. You are so on top of the updates here.

I am curious, you used to do kernels pretty much in line with the main repo, but now you are more in line with testing.

mutlu_inek · 2012-12-18 08:15:46

I'm loving the new optimized kernels! I hadn't updated in a few weeks and now my system is back up with a shiny new linux-ck-sandybridge. Thanks for all the work!

graysky · 2012-12-18 09:47:56

@WW -mainly upstream. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Li … ease_Cycle

shomyo · 2012-12-18 10:29:15

Hey graysky, thanks for bulldozer :]

yxol · 2012-12-18 14:52:56

Using a AMD A4-3305M 1.9 Ghz x86_64 processor. So a build for the AMD Fusion Family 12h microarchitecture "Llano" would be nice.

Thank you!

graysky · 2012-12-18 15:17:13

@yxol - I don't have a set of compile options for that specific processor, but it appears to be a k10 which is covered in the kx set.

Last edited by graysky (2012-12-18 15:19:52)

lybin · 2012-12-18 18:51:53

Hi! I have processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU M 380 @ 2.53GHz Code name: Arrandale
http://ark.intel.com/products/50178/Int … e-2_53-GHz
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_In … 2832_nm.29
What kernel for me?

cat /proc/cpuinfo
http://privatepaste.com/e630a80bf0

Last edited by lybin (2012-12-18 19:13:33)

Jristz · 2012-12-18 19:02:11

Is normal that /proc/cpuinfo give me ssse3 in the intrucctions in an Atom processor? as far I remmeber the ssse3 inot present in Atoms

I beggin to think that probably Atom isnot the best oftion for my Attom if the question is 'no'

Last edited by Jristz (2012-12-18 19:03:05)

graysky · 2012-12-18 21:18:24

@lybin - Does this help? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Re … _to_Select
@Jristz - No idea. See the above link.

lybin · 2012-12-18 22:09:55

graysky wrote:

@lybin - Does this help? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Re … _to_Select

Thanks, corei7 ck-nehalem

dapolinario · 2012-12-19 14:24:54

Why not linux-ck-barcelona for i686? And what is the ideal kernel for march = amdfam10?

Army · 2012-12-19 15:52:30

And what's the ideal kernel for

-march=btver1

? The CPU is the E450 in a Netbook. Right now I use linux-ck-kx.

graysky · 2012-12-19 19:12:42

@dapolinario - Haven't built it yet due to no one asking until now - it and other packages for i686/barcelona should be online in 10 min or so.
@dapolinario - I am not building a package that has that particular option at the moment.
@army - See, this table.

Last edited by graysky (2012-12-19 20:03:30)

graysky · 2012-12-20 22:23:11

MrCode wrote:

Welp, it appears it is the kernel…I installed the stock 3.7 kernel from testing and the exact same thing happened (except this time I got to see it panic...

Plz try v3.7.1-3 which should fix this issue for you:

Changelog: Added ARCH fix or watchdog regression, see: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33095

EDIT: Repo has been populated.

Last edited by graysky (2012-12-21 02:05:59)

ccpaging · 2012-12-21 11:16:08

Army wrote:

And what's the ideal kernel for
-march=btver1
? The CPU is the E450 in a Netbook. Right now I use linux-ck-kx.

May try ck-bulldozer(bdver1). My another CPU is E350 and use bulldozer now.

Last edited by ccpaging (2012-12-21 11:16:43)

Army · 2012-12-21 11:39:38

graysky wrote:

@army - See, this table.

I looked at this table, but it only contains bdver1, not btver1, so I'm not sure.

ccpaging wrote:

May try ck-bulldozer(bdver1). My another CPU is E350 and use bulldozer now.

Ok I'll install it and see how it works.

graysky · 2012-12-21 11:48:54

Army wrote:

I looked at this table, but it only contains bdver1, not btver1, so I'm not sure.

OK... that corresponds to a Bobcat processor for which I am not currently building. I don't mind building them if I know people will use them.

EDIT: Built and uploaded.

% sudo pacman -S ck-bobcat
:: There are 7 members in group ck-bobcat:
:: Repository repo-ck
   1) broadcom-wl-ck-bobcat  2) linux-ck-bobcat  3) linux-ck-bobcat-headers  4) nvidia-304xx-ck-bobcat  5) nvidia-ck-bobcat
   6) virtualbox-ck-guest-modules-bobcat  7) virtualbox-ck-host-modules-bobcat

Last edited by graysky (2012-12-21 18:25:20)

Arch Linux

#1126 2012-12-15 09:14:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1127 2012-12-15 09:46:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1128 2012-12-15 10:42:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1129 2012-12-16 01:20:09

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1130 2012-12-16 01:22:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1131 2012-12-16 04:26:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1132 2012-12-17 13:23:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1133 2012-12-17 15:26:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1134 2012-12-18 04:09:57

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1135 2012-12-18 08:15:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1136 2012-12-18 09:47:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1137 2012-12-18 10:29:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1138 2012-12-18 14:52:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1139 2012-12-18 15:17:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1140 2012-12-18 18:51:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1141 2012-12-18 19:02:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1142 2012-12-18 21:18:24

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1143 2012-12-18 22:09:55

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1144 2012-12-19 14:24:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1145 2012-12-19 15:52:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1146 2012-12-19 19:12:42

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1147 2012-12-20 22:23:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1148 2012-12-21 11:16:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1149 2012-12-21 11:39:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1150 2012-12-21 11:48:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer