You are not logged in.
You should find this in /var/log/Xorg.0.log:
...
[ 35.086] (II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: DFP-0
...
Offline
Ok so that's what it is, just a designation ![]()
Anyway, that is quite correct.
Thanks.
I am a philosopher, of sorts, not a troll or an imbecile.
My apologies that this is not always obvious, despite my best efforts.
Offline
In my experience attempting to run a flat panel at anything except native resolution is going to be far harder on your eyes than fonts that are too small
Offline
My mother's desktop computer (not under Linux) has a lcd screen which is configured at a lower resolution than native, to get bigger characters.
I didn't remark any problems with that. It's also an NVidia graphical card.
Offline
It may depend on the resolution: some lower resolutions look not-that-bad, but others look horrible. I couldn't find a way to make them better and had to settle for even lower res because otherwise e.g. the tooltips were nearly unreadable.
Offline
I couldn't find a way to make them better
Then try harder. Is this a wind-up? You've got to be kidding.
It's like, er, having the choice between reading a professionally-printed book, or a book printed by a $10 inkjet, smudged and unfocused.
It's ludicrous to suggest/recommend such a ridiculous and unnecessary compromise. Hope I've made my point ![]()
Offline
I'm not sure if I made this clear but I was talking about a Windows box (I was responding to berbae and he was talking about a non-Linux system).
Offline