You are not logged in.

#51 2025-10-12 20:13:39

cryptearth
Member
Registered: 2024-02-03
Posts: 1,719

Re: A more distributed AUR?

just to slip in: currently i have actually 27tb installed with 5x 3tb + 3x 4tb
why it shows only 21.8: the pool was created with a set of 3tb drives and that won't update until all drives got replaced
as for 24 vs 21.8: maths! 24.000.000.000.000 = 21.8 TiB
24TiB would be 26.388.279.066.624
so when i save up the coins for additional replacement drives that'll be 32TB = 29.1TiB
and even now 5TB are not "wasted" as such - but with only 250MBit/s it will take time and will be outdated during the download (which could make it fail anyway)

Offline

#52 Yesterday 10:29:02

Lone_Wolf
Administrator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 14,303

Re: A more distributed AUR?

plp wrote:

@Lone_Wolf, what are you using, if I may ask? And what is the functionality you are missing?

There are 3 main areas m my workflow :
building packages for my own use
troubleshooting/bisecting
building/verifying packages for use by others

I use ccache, tools from pacman-contrib and some self-written small scripts . My custom local repo is used mainly in the first two areas.

In the first area makepkg is the main tool, for the 2nd its clean chroot manager, for the 3rd pkgctl &  extra-x86_64-build.

ccm supports ccache and allows me to combine my pacman.conf with devtools makepkg.conf .
It also has its own local_chroot repo that stores packages built with ccm .
In the past I used my own scripts for the 2nd area, but ccm makes it easier.

Aurutils lacks ccache support (devtools also doesn't have it) and doesn't fit my workflow well.
I'd have to change my workflow to use aurutils efficiently..
Not sure when aurutils was created but when I started with aur packages 15+ years ago it didn't exist.


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky

Offline

#53 Yesterday 11:30:42

plp
Member
Registered: 2013-01-24
Posts: 65

Re: A more distributed AUR?

Here's the size of the fully cloned AUR repo on GitHub:

Summary for aur
Files:             283308
Directories:       17
Symbolic links:    0
Character devices: 0
Block devices:     0
Named pipes:       0
Sockets:           0
Drive space used:  3.1G (3267272704 bytes)

Offline

#54 Yesterday 13:26:47

seth
Member
From: Don't DM me only for attention
Registered: 2012-09-03
Posts: 68,983

Re: A more distributed AUR?

\o/
But it takes like 24h to clone it?

Online

#55 Yesterday 21:43:30

Succulent of your garden
Member
From: Majestic kingdom of pot plants
Registered: 2024-02-29
Posts: 850

Re: A more distributed AUR?

seth wrote:

But it takes like 24h to clone it?

Well I guess you can go to sleep and touch the grass, came back and after the cloning I suppose every git pull will be far more faster than the original git clone time tongue

So Sea Doggo user can be in the meantime:

AzVQunG2SCK-Ex78TCsrXqcRphZJ6wI5H6UctmhCpdQ.jpg?auto=webp&s=feb418aefa6ab7cc8e1d316739ff76dd3617306a

or this:

jazz-seal.gif


or simple this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH5K3_oUh4o

Last edited by Succulent of your garden (Yesterday 21:44:01)


str( @soyg ) == str( @potplant ) btw!

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB