You are not logged in.
PJ wrote:Cerebral wrote:The voting period will last at most two weeks from 12:01AM Friday, November 9th, EST.
Seems like there is only hours left on the voting period. Anyway, it will be interesting to see which one of the contributions that won.
These last two weeks have reminded me why I rarely enter competitions. I can't stand the suspense! AAAAAAARGH!
Heh, sorry to say, but it's going to be a little bit longer before we announce anything, I think. We still have to do a decent trademark search on the top couple of logos to ensure we won't be stepping on anyone else's toes before anything else.
Offline
Heh, sorry to say, but it's going to be a little bit longer before we announce anything, I think. We still have to do a decent trademark search on the top couple of logos to ensure we won't be stepping on anyone else's toes before anything else.
That sounds reasonable, nice to hear some status regarding this.
Offline
i have made some concept logo's, and they look nice in my opinion but they need good polish and to add some other effects.
Anybody who like to check it (and finish it) can find the svg's here .
Please send feedback.
If it ain't broke, broke it then fix it.
Offline
@Maki
A bit to much use of the blur effect in my opinion. Anyway, You are a bit late since the deadline for new submissions were 2 weeks ago and the voting period ended earlier today.
Offline
Yes, it has to much blur effect, its not polished yet. it was intended to be just a concept logo
If it ain't broke, broke it then fix it.
Offline
I wouldn't "add any effects" but rather work on simplifying the concept. I don't get the idea, and I think it would look confusing if it was scaled down to small icon sizes. Keep going, drawing logos is fun! (I even submitted an entry to the logo contest)
Offline
Offline
I've been playing around with some other fun concepts, and I do miss the old blueprint machine:
Offline
hmmmm I've always liked fresco or parchment styles as well, especially with a technical illustration:
Offline
and the third version of the 'more-floyd-like-prism'
Offline
something kind of light and natural:
Offline
@cerise: I sure hope you'll continue using your amazing grapical talents on arch artwork even if your logo doesn't win.
Last edited by divineant (2007-12-03 00:01:52)
Offline
hmmmm I've always liked fresco or parchment styles as well, especially with a technical illustration:
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/3063 … ncirn0.jpg
OH MY GOD YES YES YES YES YES. This is made of definite win.
Offline
cerise wrote:hmmmm I've always liked fresco or parchment styles as well, especially with a technical illustration:
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/3063 … ncirn0.jpgOH MY GOD YES YES YES YES YES. This is made of definite win.
The best thing about that one is that it's almost abstract, so even if Cerise's logo doesn't win the contest, it would still make a good wallpaper. I think that (and the similar blueprint) are my favourites of hers so far. The flower's pretty cool, though.
0 Ok, 0:1
Offline
Since I made an 'iris flower' ... I had to make an 'iris eyeball' ... and since arch is built on python....
Offline
@cerise: I sure hope you'll continue using your amazing grapical talents on arch artwork even if your logo doesn't win.
LOL it depends on the chosen logo. There are some logos I can do creative stuff with, but there are some that would .... well, they would be astronomically difficult to make a variety of 2d/3d wallpapers & artwork with (if even possible.)
I've at least been able to explore a wide variety of possibilities using this logo. This logo is probably my favourite after all of the logos I have created for numerous clients.
Offline
cerise wrote:hmmmm I've always liked fresco or parchment styles as well, especially with a technical illustration:
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/3063 … ncirn0.jpgOH MY GOD YES YES YES YES YES. This is made of definite win.
I've actually made an entire 'series' of the parchment/blueprint style ones, off of various internal revisions of the logo. My submission logo was one of the original variants. I've made a few revisions since then (although, they vary microscopically in appearance when not zoomed in 1600%) and with each revision I've made a new set of 'technical' drawings that I've plastered onto the parchment/blueprints.
This one was my first parchment in the series (and blueprint).
Offline
Hmmm, the equations behind how to draw this logo correctly are so pretty that I thought they would make a good wallpaper too. (I love phi!):
Offline
Hmmm, the equations behind how to draw this logo correctly are so pretty that I thought they would make a good wallpaper too. (I love phi!):
http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/5764 … thstc3.jpg
As a math major in college I must say this is the best.
Offline
cerise wrote:Hmmm, the equations behind how to draw this logo correctly are so pretty that I thought they would make a good wallpaper too. (I love phi!):
http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/5764 … thstc3.jpgAs a math major in college I must say this is the best.
I can do it in various colours too, have a preference?
Offline
As a math major in college I must say this is the best.
Cerise, can you do one with the wave function or bra-kets for the physics kids?
Offline
A derivative would be nice. dx/dy or something similar .
Offline
Cerise, can you do one with the wave function or bra-kets for the physics kids?
A derivative would be nice. dx/dy or something similar .
*busts out the sciences notes*
Wow, I haven't been asked for more science-based designs in a long time! wewt!
Let me see what I can make that looks like a good wallpaper, ok?
Offline
Offline
Hmmm, the equations behind how to draw this logo correctly are so pretty that I thought they would make a good wallpaper too. (I love phi!):
http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/5764 … thstc3.jpg
Oh dear, this concept is wonderful! But I think you should use:
(pseudoTeX) $e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0$ the Euler's formula that shows the connection beween real unit, imaginary unit, the base of exponentation and gree pi.
Edit: Ugh... I missed the last message... :S
Last edited by ezzetabi (2007-12-11 08:40:39)
Offline