Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

tigrmesh · 2008-04-22 21:58:29

brebs wrote:

I'm distro-hopping again

You're leaving? Oh noes! You're someone who knows one end of an ethernet cable from the other... You will be missed.

TjPhysicist · 2008-04-23 00:18:56

I put .59 on AUR a bit back, somoene deleted it for some reason. I understand wine is in [extra] but it too behind, since I am compliling anways I thought I might as well post the pkgbuild and then use it!

The latest one should be up in a bit.

If anyone is interested (hates compiling) I will put up the packages that I have built so you just have to run pacman -U (if you already have a previous version of wine) or pacman -A (add wine) followed by the packages full name.

Tj.Physicist.googlepages.com/wine-<version #>.pkg.tar.gz

Replace <version #> with version number (such as 0.9.60).

I will try not to be too behind on the pkgbuilds, I promise. I had exams so I did not bother compiling (I cant do much else when compiling as we all know).

-Tj

P.S: Cant Wait for 1.00, YAY!!!

Last edited by TjPhysicist (2008-04-23 00:43:01)

lloeki · 2008-04-23 08:46:08

TjPhysicist,

I put .59 on AUR a bit back, somoene deleted it for some reason

obvious:
- run abs
- copy extra/wine to some other place
- change version number
- makepkg
- pacman -U
this implies putting wine in AUR is redundant.

as for your second point, you might just as well use the repo-add command and put that online too. then, people just have to add a line to their pacman.conf and pacman -Sy wine

the problem at hand here is more for people using arch64 without a chroot (thus can't compile wine themselves) and wanting to have latest wine, since aur/bin32-wine relies on extra/wine.

Last edited by lloeki (2008-04-23 08:49:51)

oliwer · 2008-04-23 19:30:49

But seriously, when is the wine package maintainer going to do to his job ?

kensai · 2008-04-24 12:23:58

And I must say .60 is such a great improvement, at least on my side, so sad it isn't updated as regularly as it should.

lloeki · 2008-04-24 14:23:54

temporary solution:

i=60; wget http://www.dayfive.ath.cx/lloeki/files/wine-0.9.${i}-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz

$i can be 56 to 60.
can obviously be used with bin32-wine from AUR for x64.
hosted on personal server on home dsl line. please try not to overload it.

oliwer · 2008-04-24 15:56:35

Thank you lloeki

TjPhysicist · 2008-04-26 02:50:57

Sorry abt the delay guys wine 0.9.60 is up, 0.9.59 is uploading. Again the site is tj.physicist.googlepages.com/wine-<version #>-<architecture type>.pkg.tar.gz.

Currently I only compile for i686, generic. I don't have access to a 64 bit machine (sorry arch64 bit guys, if i do get one I can compile in, I will let you guys know. I only have a laptop, so I dont have a static IP etc, so I dont know how to host a repo mirror or whatever. I may compile for a pentium Centrino Core Duo, starting in a next version (my rommies laptop).

So currently <version #> is 0.9.60 and <architecture type> is i686 (generic).

brebs · 2008-04-26 08:15:17

TjPhysicist wrote:

sorry arch64 bit guys

Wine is 32-bit anyway

So the 64-bit wine pkgbuild uses the 32-bit package.

TjPhysicist · 2008-04-26 18:19:17

brebs wrote:

TjPhysicist wrote:
sorry arch64 bit guys
Wine is 32-bit anyway
So the 64-bit wine pkgbuild uses the 32-bit package.

O really? did not know that. So thats good then. Anyways, an update for those of you who care, all the wine pkgs are finally up (sorry slow internet, I am not at home right now). Just use the same site as before. Except you can just go to http://Tj.Physicist.googlepages.com (no need to add anything) and follow the links. Its easier this way, in case I need to use another server to host the files in the future (uploading to google pages take FOREVER).

lloeki · 2008-05-03 20:39:26

$i=61 is up.

ProzacR · 2008-05-03 20:50:15

gj. thx.

ProzacR · 2008-05-10 19:19:45

1.0rc?

kensai · 2008-05-10 19:28:29

Ok, there we don't need to rush, is just a bug fixing release with no interesting new features. even tough is good to have bugs fixed, it ain't that urgent, unless there has been a security issue reported.

ProzacR · 2008-05-10 20:56:25

I do not talk about "we".
But I disagree; I believe we will update to rc1 exactly one day before rc2 is out.

Back to topic. I want to use wine rc's, but as always I am to lazy to compile. Who can share binaries?

p.s. I understand that there is no big changes from 0.9.61.

toofishes · 2008-05-10 23:43:49

ProzacR wrote:

Back to topic. I want to use wine rc's, but as always I am to lazy to compile. Who can share binaries?

You realize with this attitude, no one will ever do work for you? Or maybe someone will be glad to share some 'wine binaries' with you since you can't be bothered to make them and check them on your own.

kensai · 2008-05-11 01:10:16

ProzacR wrote:

I believe we will update to rc1 exactly one day before rc2 is out.

Oh, nice then we at least know it will be upgraded on May 22.

ProzacR wrote:

I want to use wine rc's, but as always I am to lazy to compile. Who can share binaries?

OMG, for the first time I do wish nobody shares the binaries of rc1.

Last edited by kensai (2008-05-11 01:10:31)

synthead · 2008-05-11 03:40:42

ProzacR wrote:

ack to topic. I want to use wine rc's, but as always I am to lazy to compile. Who can share binaries?

kensai wrote:

OMG, for the first time I do wish nobody shares the binaries of rc1.

I agree. It takes ten minutes on a slow computer. With the time wasted posting this and asking for someone else to do it, you could have wine compiled and installed already. It's not even hard either.

_Marco_ · 2008-05-11 07:32:40

@synthead: only ten minutes? what computer do you have
it takes 30-45 minutes for me on a 3 years old laptop, anyway this is not a big issue for me (I usually compile wine myself every release)

tomk · 2008-05-11 07:53:40

ProzacR - this is the only wine-related thread that I'm aware of in which people have done something constructive. It would be good if you followed the lead given by lloeki and TjPhysicist, instead of posting about how lazy you are. If this thread degenerates into the kind of "Wine whine" we've seen elsewhere, it will be closed.

ProzacR · 2008-05-11 11:35:01

tomk wrote:

it will be closed.

OK. I have already http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/archive … 1_i386.deb so you can close this tread now.
Good that at least Ubuntu keeps packages up to date.

Last edited by ProzacR (2008-05-11 11:37:47)

kensai · 2008-05-11 14:29:39

ProzacR wrote:

Good that at least Ubuntu keeps packages up to date.

He just never learn, and will never do, lazy people are just condemned to whine all their life.

Last edited by kensai (2008-05-11 15:37:56)

ProzacR · 2008-05-11 18:46:06

It is fun to see 7 posts talking against 6 symbols.

Looks like teamwork trash posting here is much easier than just compile.
But situation is little advanced now. At least no one is trying to explain how to use super-duper AUR.

Last edited by ProzacR (2008-05-11 18:46:40)

xsdnyd · 2008-05-11 18:54:34

I just compiled it for myself, perhabs anyone finds it useful too

http://reactor.reality-protocol.de/misc … pkg.tar.gz

Last edited by xsdnyd (2008-05-11 18:58:02)

kensai · 2008-05-11 19:21:50

ProzacR wrote:

But situation is little advanced now. At least no one is trying to explain how to use super-duper AUR.

http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Main_Page

Note to myself, some people are born to be ...

Thanks for the package xsdnyd. I would have hope that no one made it available, or at least block his IP please, so he can't download it.

Just to clarify, the 1.0 release is going to receive minor updates, like 1.0.1 and so on. But 2 weeks after the 1.0 release there will be 1.1 and then so on. So very little changes, but a stable branch is created.

Last edited by kensai (2008-05-11 19:25:32)

Arch Linux

#26 2008-04-22 21:58:29

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#27 2008-04-23 00:18:56

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#28 2008-04-23 08:46:08

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#29 2008-04-23 19:30:49

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#30 2008-04-24 12:23:58

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#31 2008-04-24 14:23:54

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#32 2008-04-24 15:56:35

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#33 2008-04-26 02:50:57

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#34 2008-04-26 08:15:17

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#35 2008-04-26 18:19:17

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#36 2008-05-03 20:39:26

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#37 2008-05-03 20:50:15

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#38 2008-05-10 19:19:45

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#39 2008-05-10 19:28:29

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#40 2008-05-10 20:56:25

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#41 2008-05-10 23:43:49

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#42 2008-05-11 01:10:16

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#43 2008-05-11 03:40:42

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#44 2008-05-11 07:32:40

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#45 2008-05-11 07:53:40

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#46 2008-05-11 11:35:01

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#47 2008-05-11 14:29:39

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#48 2008-05-11 18:46:06

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#49 2008-05-11 18:54:34

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

#50 2008-05-11 19:21:50

Re: Do Wine and Windows matter less to Archers?

Board footer