New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

Gert · 2008-05-28 23:49:23

Great work man, I really appreciate your tool. Thank you.

Cimi · 2008-05-29 00:22:43

There are few bugs that will cause some updgrades to fail. This is because makepkg is not able to parse >= etc deps flags.
But pacbuilder will do it soon!

Also we are working (now we are 3 people) on porting the -S... options of pacman, to make the usage simpler

Cimi · 2008-05-29 22:02:23

Hi guys, my name is PacBuilder!

dhave · 2008-05-29 22:05:47

Cimi wrote:

Hi guys, my name is PacBuilder!
http://www.archlinux.it/pacbuilder/pacbuilder.png

Hi, PacBuilder! I'm dhave! You've been drinking coffee again, haven't you ...?

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-29 23:05:15

dhave wrote:

Cimi wrote:
Hi guys, my name is PacBuilder!
http://www.archlinux.it/pacbuilder/pacbuilder.png
Hi, PacBuilder! I'm dhave! You've been drinking coffee again, haven't you ...?

lool too mutch caffin will kill ya XD

LTSmash · 2008-05-30 00:15:30

Cimi wrote:

LTSmash wrote:
Cimi wrote:
if someone wants to join the development...
How?
Are you using Bash or else?
just plain bash

Thats cool how do I join?

Cimi · 2008-05-30 11:36:59

LTSmash wrote:

Cimi wrote:
LTSmash wrote:
How?
Are you using Bash or else?
just plain bash
Thats cool how do I join?

you could search me in IRC when I'm online.
Same nick

SpookyET · 2008-05-30 14:27:34

FISH Completion

It should go into one of the following:
~/.config/fish/completions/pacbuilder.fish
/usr/share/fish/completions/pacbuilder.fish

pacbuilder.fish

# vim: set ft=fish :et"

# General:
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'help' -d "print this help"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'clean' -d "remove previous log"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'edit' -d "be verbose and edit PKGBUILD"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'gccinfo' -d "print current compilation flags"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'nocolor' -d "don't use any color"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'notitle' -d "don't print the title"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'noresume' -d "don't resume"

# Install:
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -s 'S' -l 'install' -d "build specified packages"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -s 'b' -l 'builddeps' -n '__fish_contains_opt -s S install' -d "build and install the dependencies"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -s 'e' -l 'edit' -n '__fish_contains_opt -s S install' -d "be verbose and edit PKGBUILD"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -s 'k' -l 'keepdeps' -n '__fish_contains_opt -s S install' -d "keep makedepends after install"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -s 'u' -l 'sysupgrade' -n '__fish_contains_opt -s S install' -d "build the updated packages"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -s 'v' -l 'verbose' -n '__fish_contains_opt -s S install' -d "print makepkg output"

# Type:
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'world' -d "recompile both deps and explicit"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'explicit' -d "recompile explicitely installed packages"

# Target repository:
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'core' -d "recompile packages in core"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'extra' -d "recompile packages in extra"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'testing' -d "recompile packages in testing"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'unstable' -d "recompile packages in unstable"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'community' -d "recompile packages in community"
complete -c 'pacbuilder' -l 'aur' -d "recompile packages in aur"

Here's how completion generally looks like in FISH:

Don't ask to write bash completion. It's horrible. I may write a zsh one.

Last edited by SpookyET (2008-05-30 14:27:58)

zodmaner · 2008-05-30 14:35:19

Cimi wrote:

Hi guys, my name is PacBuilder!
http://www.archlinux.it/pacbuilder/pacbuilder.png

Cool icon.

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-30 21:05:19

Cimi wrote:

LTSmash wrote:
Cimi wrote:
just plain bash
Thats cool how do I join?
you could search me in IRC when I'm online.
Same nick

cimi what channel do u usually go to?
i have this problm...i dont now if it is a bug but with --buildeps flag its seens that pacbuilder doesnt fetch a lot of deps...dont no why...many packages fail because of the make deps...can u help?

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-31 14:09:32

cimi here it is an example...

==> Making package: awesome 2.3-2 (Sat May 31 14:01:41 AZOST 2008)
==> WARNING: Running makepkg as root...
==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
==> Missing Dependencies:
-> docbook-xsl
-> asciidoc
-> xmlto
==> ERROR: Could not resolve all dependencies.
==> Installing awesome-2.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz [package 9 of 834] ...==> Building awesome [package 9 of 834] ... makepkg failed!

reacocard · 2008-05-31 15:02:56

aRcHaTe wrote:

cimi here it is an example...
==> Making package: awesome 2.3-2 (Sat May 31 14:01:41 AZOST 2008)
==> WARNING: Running makepkg as root...
==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
==> Missing Dependencies:
-> docbook-xsl
-> asciidoc
-> xmlto
==> ERROR: Could not resolve all dependencies.
==> Installing awesome-2.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz [package 9 of 834] ...==> Building awesome [package 9 of 834] ... makepkg failed!

have you tried the --builddeps flag?

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-31 15:20:31

reacocard wrote:

aRcHaTe wrote:
cimi here it is an example...
==> Making package: awesome 2.3-2 (Sat May 31 14:01:41 AZOST 2008)
==> WARNING: Running makepkg as root...
==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
==> Missing Dependencies:
-> docbook-xsl
-> asciidoc
-> xmlto
==> ERROR: Could not resolve all dependencies.
==> Installing awesome-2.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz [package 9 of 834] ...==> Building awesome [package 9 of 834] ... makepkg failed!
have you tried the --builddeps flag?

yes

Cimi · 2008-05-31 16:08:17

aRcHaTe wrote:

reacocard wrote:
aRcHaTe wrote:
cimi here it is an example...
==> Making package: awesome 2.3-2 (Sat May 31 14:01:41 AZOST 2008)
==> WARNING: Running makepkg as root...
==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
==> Missing Dependencies:
-> docbook-xsl
-> asciidoc
-> xmlto
==> ERROR: Could not resolve all dependencies.
==> Installing awesome-2.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz [package 9 of 834] ...==> Building awesome [package 9 of 834] ... makepkg failed!
have you tried the --builddeps flag?
yes

www.gentoo.org

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-31 18:48:47

Cimi wrote:

aRcHaTe wrote:
reacocard wrote:
have you tried the --builddeps flag?
yes
www.gentoo.org

what?

Cimi · 2008-05-31 19:38:50

aRcHaTe wrote:

Cimi wrote:
aRcHaTe wrote:
yes
www.gentoo.org
what?

Sorry, I've finished my patience

aRcHaTe · 2008-05-31 19:43:32

Cimi wrote:

aRcHaTe wrote:
Cimi wrote:
www.gentoo.org
what?
Sorry, I've finished my patience

ho...thats like..sad to know...im not trying to bug u..so ok

LTSmash · 2008-06-01 02:53:14

aRcHaTe wrote:

Cimi wrote:
LTSmash wrote:
Thats cool how do I join?
you could search me in IRC when I'm online.
Same nick
cimi what channel do u usually go to?

May I repeat the question?

Cimi · 2008-06-01 11:59:51

LTSmash wrote:

aRcHaTe wrote:
Cimi wrote:
you could search me in IRC when I'm online.
Same nick
cimi what channel do u usually go to?
May I repeat the question?

#archlinux, nick Cimi

aRcHaTe · 2008-06-01 17:25:11

hi man the last updated u made fixed my problm..so mutch for ur patience....

Cimi · 2008-06-15 01:56:00

I need someone to implement the search feature

Blµb · 2008-06-20 15:28:35

Wait, shouldn't pacman -Ss do THAT job?
Anyway,
[patch following]
I thought a flag similar to emerge's -p would be useful, so I added -p and --pretend, which makes build_multiple_packages simply LIST the packages.
I found it quite annoying that the list wasn't printed when using --core for example (or did I miss something there? I tried --verbose too...)

and added -c / --confirm, which asks if it should continue after printing the list of packages which would be installed

http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0725517/pac … nfirm.diff

feel free to beat the crap out of me if I screwed up
(virtually of course... like... in nexuiz)

Cimi · 2008-06-20 15:49:54

Blµb wrote:

Wait, shouldn't pacman -Ss do THAT job?
Anyway,
[patch following]
I thought a flag similar to emerge's -p would be useful, so I added -p and --pretend, which makes build_multiple_packages simply LIST the packages.
I found it quite annoying that the list wasn't printed when using --core for example (or did I miss something there? I tried --verbose too...)
and added -c / --confirm, which asks if it should continue after printing the list of packages which would be installed
http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0725517/pac … nfirm.diff
feel free to beat the crap out of me if I screwed up
(virtually of course... like... in nexuiz)

maybe -a is better than -c ? I was wondering about --clean...

Blµb · 2008-06-20 16:43:27

right, I don't really care about the letter as long as it exists

Last edited by Blµb (2008-06-20 16:53:49)

Cimi · 2008-06-20 17:45:38

Blµb wrote:

right, I don't really care about the letter as long as it exists

if you want to join the development to add search etc etc or other things feel free

Arch Linux

#126 2008-05-28 23:49:23

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#127 2008-05-29 00:22:43

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#128 2008-05-29 22:02:23

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#129 2008-05-29 22:05:47

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#130 2008-05-29 23:05:15

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#131 2008-05-30 00:15:30

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#132 2008-05-30 11:36:59

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#133 2008-05-30 14:27:34

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#134 2008-05-30 14:35:19

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#135 2008-05-30 21:05:19

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#136 2008-05-31 14:09:32

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#137 2008-05-31 15:02:56

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#138 2008-05-31 15:20:31

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#139 2008-05-31 16:08:17

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#140 2008-05-31 18:48:47

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#141 2008-05-31 19:38:50

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#142 2008-05-31 19:43:32

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#143 2008-06-01 02:53:14

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#144 2008-06-01 11:59:51

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#145 2008-06-01 17:25:11

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#146 2008-06-15 01:56:00

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#147 2008-06-20 15:28:35

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#148 2008-06-20 15:49:54

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#149 2008-06-20 16:43:27

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

#150 2008-06-20 17:45:38

Re: New pacman utility, rebuild and optimize packages from source

Board footer