You are not logged in.

#201 2009-12-14 13:56:50

rebegin
Member
Registered: 2009-05-30
Posts: 10

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

hello,

i tried to install  kernel26-ck with yaourt and also generating package with makepkg -s but all i got is a 419Byte package only with .PKGNFO in it.

edit: i left the default 300 HZ when it asked for Timer frequency...

what am i doing wrong?
thanks in advance

Last edited by rebegin (2009-12-14 14:00:56)

Offline

#202 2009-12-14 14:03:04

tomk
Forum Fellow
From: Ireland
Registered: 2004-07-21
Posts: 9,839

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

flamelab, read the question again:

ammon wrote:

Will normal nvidia package work with kernel26-ck?

I'm pretty sure "normal nvidia package" means "nvidia package from the extra repo", in which case the answer is "no, it won't work with kernel26-ck".

ammon - you need to rebuild the nvidia package for any non-standard kernel.

Offline

#203 2009-12-14 14:04:23

tomk
Forum Fellow
From: Ireland
Registered: 2004-07-21
Posts: 9,839

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

rebegin - if that's really all you got, there should have been tons of error messages during the build - did you read any of them?

Try again, and use makepkg -L to generate a build log.

Offline

#204 2009-12-14 14:15:35

bangkok_manouel
Member
From: indicates a starting point
Registered: 2005-02-07
Posts: 1,556

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

everyone pay respect to our former -ck kernel maintainer smile
any plan to bring it back to life ?

Offline

#205 2009-12-14 15:19:32

rebegin
Member
Registered: 2009-05-30
Posts: 10

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

tomk wrote:

rebegin - if that's really all you got, there should have been tons of error messages during the build - did you read any of them?

Try again, and use makepkg -L to generate a build log.

thanks for the suggestion.
i haven't seen any error messages during the build.
also tried to to makepkg -L but then it falis where i have to choose Timer frequency:

Timer frequency                                                                                       
  1. 100 HZ (HZ_100)                                                                                  
  2. 250 HZ (HZ_250_NODEFAULT) (NEW)
> 3. 300 HZ (HZ_300)
  4. 1000 HZ (HZ_1000)
  5. 1500 HZ (HZ_1500) (NEW)
  6. 2000 HZ (HZ_2000) (NEW)
  7. 3000 HZ (HZ_3000) (NEW)
  8. 4000 HZ (HZ_4000) (NEW)
  9. 5000 HZ (HZ_5000) (NEW)
  10. 7500 HZ (HZ_7500) (NEW)
  11. 10000 HZ (HZ_10000) (NEW)
choice[1-11?]: aborted!

Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update configuration.

make[2]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 1
make[1]: *** [silentoldconfig] Error 2
make: *** No rule to make target `include/config/auto.conf', needed by `include/config/kernel.release'.  Stop.
==> ERROR: Build Failed.
    Aborting...

edit: running 'make oldconfig' didn't help of course

Last edited by rebegin (2009-12-14 15:20:25)

Offline

#206 2009-12-14 15:30:49

tomk
Forum Fellow
From: Ireland
Registered: 2004-07-21
Posts: 9,839

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

bangkok_manouel wrote:

everyone pay respect to our former -ck kernel maintainer smile
any plan to bring it back to life ?

Thanks smile

I'm neither a dev or a TU anymore, so I'll leave it to someone else. Everyone vote for MP2E's package, and then annoy some TU(s) until it gets into community. tongue

Offline

#207 2009-12-14 16:28:39

brenix
Member
From: California
Registered: 2008-03-05
Posts: 185

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

Is the kernel26-ck package supposed to generate the kernel images like the kernel26-bfs package, or does it replace the current vanilla kernel? I don't see any kernel26-ck.img or vmlinuz-ck files in /boot? mkinitpcio didn't run on two computers....

Offline

#208 2009-12-14 16:31:29

rebegin
Member
Registered: 2009-05-30
Posts: 10

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

brenix wrote:

Is the kernel26-ck package supposed to generate the kernel images like the kernel26-bfs package, or does it replace the current vanilla kernel? I don't see any kernel26-ck.img or vmlinuz-ck files in /boot? mkinitpcio didn't run on two computers....

this is what happened on my pc too...

Offline

#209 2009-12-14 16:48:22

hth90nor
Member
Registered: 2009-12-14
Posts: 4

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

Yaourt don't do anything with the kernel26.install file.

Offline

#210 2009-12-14 21:13:47

brenix
Member
From: California
Registered: 2008-03-05
Posts: 185

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

rebegin wrote:

this is what happened on my pc too...

hth90nor wrote:

Yaourt don't do anything with the kernel26.install file.

Try un-commenting line 6 of the PKGBUILD and comment out line 5. That seemed to work for me..

Offline

#211 2009-12-14 22:51:11

hth90nor
Member
Registered: 2009-12-14
Posts: 4

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

Worked perfectly brenix thanks.

Offline

#212 2009-12-14 23:22:30

ngoonee
Forum Fellow
From: Between Thailand and Singapore
Registered: 2009-03-17
Posts: 7,356

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

tomk wrote:
bangkok_manouel wrote:

everyone pay respect to our former -ck kernel maintainer smile
any plan to bring it back to life ?

Thanks smile

I'm neither a dev or a TU anymore, so I'll leave it to someone else. Everyone vote for MP2E's package, and then annoy some TU(s) until it gets into community. tongue

Do ANY kernels stand a chance of [community]?


Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.

Offline

#213 2009-12-14 23:24:30

rebegin
Member
Registered: 2009-05-30
Posts: 10

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

worked here too, thanks

brenix wrote:
rebegin wrote:

this is what happened on my pc too...

hth90nor wrote:

Yaourt don't do anything with the kernel26.install file.

Try un-commenting line 6 of the PKGBUILD and comment out line 5. That seemed to work for me..

Offline

#214 2009-12-15 00:13:25

tomk
Forum Fellow
From: Ireland
Registered: 2004-07-21
Posts: 9,839

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

ngoonee wrote:

Do ANY kernels stand a chance of [community]?

I don't see why not. All you need is a sufficiently interested TU (like I used to be smile ).

Offline

#215 2009-12-15 00:34:37

MP2E
Member
Registered: 2009-09-05
Posts: 115

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

brenix wrote:
rebegin wrote:

this is what happened on my pc too...

hth90nor wrote:

Yaourt don't do anything with the kernel26.install file.

Try un-commenting line 6 of the PKGBUILD and comment out line 5. That seemed to work for me..

Damnit, I had a feeling that would be a problem. Unfortunately the only reason line 5 exists is because the AUR won't allow more than one pkgname in a PKGBUILD. I'll post up a comment saying to comment out line 5 and uncomment line 6 (that's how I did it myself), however this seems pretty annoying. Is there any better way to do this? Or shall I get on the AUR mailing lists and harass them?


17:23 < ConSiGno> yeah baby I release the source code with your mom every night
17:24 < ConSiGno> you could call them nightly builds if you know what I mean

Offline

#216 2009-12-15 07:25:19

ngoonee
Forum Fellow
From: Between Thailand and Singapore
Registered: 2009-03-17
Posts: 7,356

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

tomk wrote:
ngoonee wrote:

Do ANY kernels stand a chance of [community]?

I don't see why not. All you need is a sufficiently interested TU (like I used to be smile ).

I remember seeing a wiki page explaining why some packages would never be considered for binary distribution, such as yaourt, from the 'official' repos, no matter how many votes they got. I thought I saw there that alternative kernels would never be considered for such a thing.


Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.

Offline

#217 2009-12-15 08:07:12

tomk
Forum Fellow
From: Ireland
Registered: 2004-07-21
Posts: 9,839

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

OK.. you probably need a current TU to comment then. Or ask on aur-general.

Offline

#218 2009-12-15 17:37:52

registeringsucks
Member
Registered: 2009-04-27
Posts: 27

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

How do i get things like ossv4 to work with kernel26-ck? It demands some kernel-devel files, the aur package doesnt provide.
Or im a doing sth wrong on my side?

Offline

#219 2009-12-15 17:44:08

shining
Pacman Developer
Registered: 2006-05-10
Posts: 2,043

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

registeringsucks wrote:

How do i get things like ossv4 to work with kernel26-ck? It demands some kernel-devel files, the aur package doesnt provide.
Or im a doing sth wrong on my side?

Look a few comments above, #215

You have to enable header inside the pkgbuild and then install that package.


pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))

Offline

#220 2009-12-15 19:57:39

registeringsucks
Member
Registered: 2009-04-27
Posts: 27

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

i did as instructed in that comment, however the kernel-headers simply dont appear anywhere after installation.

Offline

#221 2009-12-15 20:53:26

Procyon
Member
Registered: 2008-05-07
Posts: 1,819

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

Another thing about that,
pkgname=('kernel26-ck' 'kernel26-firmware' 'kernel26-headers')

shouldn't the other two have a -ck extension too?

Offline

#222 2009-12-15 21:02:37

registeringsucks
Member
Registered: 2009-04-27
Posts: 27

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

Procyon wrote:

Another thing about that,
pkgname=('kernel26-ck' 'kernel26-firmware' 'kernel26-headers')

shouldn't the other two have a -ck extension too?

i wondered about that myself.
I tried to remove the kernel26-headers package that came with the stock kernel to avoid possible conflicts but that didnt help.
Ill guess i have to take another look at the pkgbuild...

Offline

#223 2009-12-15 22:11:33

MP2E
Member
Registered: 2009-09-05
Posts: 115

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

registeringsucks wrote:
Procyon wrote:

Another thing about that,
pkgname=('kernel26-ck' 'kernel26-firmware' 'kernel26-headers')

shouldn't the other two have a -ck extension too?

i wondered about that myself.
I tried to remove the kernel26-headers package that came with the stock kernel to avoid possible conflicts but that didnt help.
Ill guess i have to take another look at the pkgbuild...

I've been debating that as well, but I think that kernel26-firmware conflicts with the official firmware anyway. I'd like to seperate them like I did with the kernel itself(renamed it to kernel26-ck.img and vmlinuz-ck.img) but I'm not sure how to go about doing this..


17:23 < ConSiGno> yeah baby I release the source code with your mom every night
17:24 < ConSiGno> you could call them nightly builds if you know what I mean

Offline

#224 2009-12-15 22:17:19

shining
Pacman Developer
Registered: 2006-05-10
Posts: 2,043

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

MP2E wrote:

I've been debating that as well, but I think that kernel26-firmware conflicts with the official firmware anyway. I'd like to seperate them like I did with the kernel itself(renamed it to kernel26-ck.img and vmlinuz-ck.img) but I'm not sure how to go about doing this..

pkgname=('kernel26-ck' 'kernel26-firmware' 'kernel26-headers')

That should definitely be kernel26-ck-headers instead. Using kernel26-headers for two different kernel is broken. You should be able to install kernel headers for arch kernel and for ck kernel in the same time.
And no conflict either because they should be installed to two different directories in /usr/src : /usr/src/linux-2.6.32-ARCH for arch and /usr/src/linux-2.6.32-ck or whatever for ck.

Don't bother with the firmware, they are not going to change, just strip everything related to kernel26-firmware from your pkgbuild.


pacman roulette : pacman -S $(pacman -Slq | LANG=C sort -R | head -n $((RANDOM % 10)))

Offline

#225 2009-12-15 22:36:51

attila
Member
Registered: 2006-11-14
Posts: 293

Re: omg! Con Kolivas is back!

shining wrote:

Don't bother with the firmware, they are not going to change, just strip everything related to kernel26-firmware from your pkgbuild.

And if it is necessary to include them than remove the lines that you suggested, comment out "rm -rf ${pkgdir}/lib/firmware" and append "INSTALL_FW_PATH=$pkgdir/lib/firmware/${_basekernel}-${_kernelname}" to the line with the modules_install. The result will be that this files stays in /lib/firmware/2.6.32-ck at example and this alternative way to install the firmware is used by other distros too.

Example:

...
make INSTALL_FW_PATH=$pkgdir/lib/firmware/${_basekernel}-${_kernelname} \
       INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$pkgdir modules_install || return 1
...
#rm -rf ${pkgdir}/lib/firmware
...

I must admit that i never understand why the firmware files of the kernel package never be in "/lib/firmware/2.6.31-ARCH" as in other distros because than it is easier to see what is from the kernel and what is from a extra package. But this is not a big point.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB