December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

weakhead · 2009-12-28 17:42:42

@opothehippo, @zodmaner

Here it is: http://weakhead.deviantart.com/art/Lite … -148308075

acoples · 2009-12-28 19:20:09

borrell · 2009-12-29 01:27:29

Xmonad on my Netbook. Only switched from awesome a few days ago, after an update broke my config (AGAIN) and I couldn't be bothered trying to find what was wrong. I'm liking Xmonad very much so far, sane defaults, very customizable

Also, the version of archey in the AUR isn't working, I'm getting an 'IndexError: list index out of range' on line 209

Last edited by borrell (2009-12-29 01:38:40)

cinan · 2009-12-29 11:43:24

aakos23 · 2009-12-29 12:33:36

Clean

Dirty

Archlinux + Kdemod

lolilolicon · 2009-12-29 14:38:49

Yo! I got XMonad for the coming new year.

DawiX · 2009-12-29 19:34:07

So my netbook got a new face for upcoming new year. Changed to a more arch-like theme. As usually dwm :-)

NeoXP · 2009-12-29 20:08:45

borrell wrote:

http://borrellstudios.com/images/screen … -thumb.png
Xmonad on my Netbook. Only switched from awesome a few days ago, after an update broke my config (AGAIN) and I couldn't be bothered trying to find what was wrong. I'm liking Xmonad very much so far, sane defaults, very customizable
Also, the version of archey in the AUR isn't working, I'm getting an 'IndexError: list index out of range' on line 209

Could you post your colorscheme?

CalcAndCoffee · 2009-12-30 01:08:54

Back in KDE after using wmii for a while. The Winter desktop lost its charm, though.

Clean:

Dirty:

To my dismay, I have discovered a vast difference in the theming abilities of emacs and vim.

borrell · 2009-12-30 02:32:31

NeoXP wrote:

borrell wrote:
http://borrellstudios.com/images/screen … -thumb.png
Xmonad on my Netbook. Only switched from awesome a few days ago, after an update broke my config (AGAIN) and I couldn't be bothered trying to find what was wrong. I'm liking Xmonad very much so far, sane defaults, very customizable
Also, the version of archey in the AUR isn't working, I'm getting an 'IndexError: list index out of range' on line 209
Could you post your colorscheme?

Sure thing, although it's stolen straight from http://github.com/DaisukeAramaki/Config … .Xdefaults (Thanks Daisuke )

!thayer colors
 
!black
!*color0: #1B1D1E
!*color8: #505354
*color0: #262729
*color8: #554444
 
!red
*color1: #F92672
*color9: #FF669D
!green
*color2: #A6E22E
*color10: #BEED5F
!yellow
*color3: #FD971F
*color11: #E6DB74
!blue
*color4: #66D9EF
*color12: #66D9EF
!magenta
*color5: #9E6FFE
*color13: #9E6FFE
!cyan
*color6: #5E7175
*color14: #A3BABF
!white
*color7: #CCCCC6
*color15: #F8F8F2

jasonwryan · 2009-12-30 02:34:48

borrell wrote:

Sure thing, although it's stolen straight from http://github.com/DaisukeAramaki/Config … .Xdefaults (Thanks Daisuke )
!thayer colors
... snip

Heh. Perhaps that should be thanks Thayer...

borrell · 2009-12-30 02:59:15

Absolutely it should be thanks Thayer, I wasn't able to find him though. I didn't look hard enough then haha

toxygen · 2009-12-30 05:56:09

final update for me this year. i figured out how to get 2 desktops + 1 activity going (kde 4.3.x has issues with plasma desktop and activities "breeding like rabbits" as someone said on the kde forums.)

this is main desktop, busy:

clean:

the second desktop is what i used to have as the main desktop, and now contains the plasmoids i'm testing:

kdemod 4.3.4, plasma theme - naked, qtcurve, conky on the sides, wallpaper is a van gogh painting. a lot of transparency

no shots of activity desktop. i look forward to 4.4, where apparently a lot of the plasma bugs are fixed.

FooSoft · 2009-12-30 10:47:39

Desktop:

Netbook:

Last edited by FooSoft (2009-12-30 19:52:39)

RaisedFist · 2009-12-30 11:03:11

@foosoft: my eyes BLEEEEEEEEED!!! and my browser crawls

mikesd · 2009-12-30 11:31:19

Woah, FooSoft! Thumbnails please. Check the instructions in the first post

tomd123 · 2009-12-30 16:35:16

RaisedFist wrote:

@foosoft: my eyes BLEEEEEEEEED!!! and my browser crawls

time for a new computer

BTW it's not THAT bad is it?.. 1000x600 pics?

lolilolicon · 2009-12-30 19:04:21

Back to the Darkness...

ent · 2009-12-30 19:29:23

lolilolicon wrote:

http://s3.amazonaws.com/scrnshots.com/s … g_med_rect
Back to the Darkness...

What is that box menu thing? I've seen it before but I completely forget what it's called.

Procyon · 2009-12-30 19:41:13

lolilolicon wrote:

http://s3.amazonaws.com/scrnshots.com/s … g_med_rect
Back to the Darkness...

Haha, experiment failed already?

FooSoft · 2009-12-30 19:53:09

mikesd wrote:

Woah, FooSoft! Thumbnails please. Check the instructions in the first post

Oops, fixed

NeoXP · 2009-12-30 19:54:25

My latest, info in the clean screenshot.

clean:

dirty:

lolilolicon · 2009-12-30 20:03:00

ent wrote:

What is that box menu thing? I've seen it before but I completely forget what it's called.

It's called GridSelect. Really nice thingy only seen in xmonad.

Procyon wrote:

Haha, experiment failed already?

Hmm... I was working on another light terminal colorscheme, on a light background, the colors look great when printed in blocks, but small font won't express the colors the same way. I was done with the 8 * 2 colors, time to determine the background .. then I suddenly fell back into darkness .... Yeah, it looks much better in the dark.

Ya know, with various schemes all designed to work with a dark background... Going light seems a bit "off-topic" ...

Anyway ... Let there be light ... ...

jdarnold · 2009-12-30 20:26:26

where do those handy dandy terminal color tables come from? I see one using 'colortable' and another using 'termcolors' commands.

jasonwryan · 2009-12-30 20:30:41

jdarnold wrote:

where do those handy dandy terminal color tables come from? I see one using 'colortable' and another using 'termcolors' commands.

This thread has the details: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=51818

Arch Linux

#451 2009-12-28 17:42:42

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#452 2009-12-28 19:20:09

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#453 2009-12-29 01:27:29

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#454 2009-12-29 11:43:24

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#455 2009-12-29 12:33:36

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#456 2009-12-29 14:38:49

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#457 2009-12-29 19:34:07

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#458 2009-12-29 20:08:45

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#459 2009-12-30 01:08:54

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#460 2009-12-30 02:32:31

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#461 2009-12-30 02:34:48

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#462 2009-12-30 02:59:15

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#463 2009-12-30 05:56:09

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#464 2009-12-30 10:47:39

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#465 2009-12-30 11:03:11

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#466 2009-12-30 11:31:19

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#467 2009-12-30 16:35:16

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#468 2009-12-30 19:04:21

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#469 2009-12-30 19:29:23

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#470 2009-12-30 19:41:13

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#471 2009-12-30 19:53:09

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#472 2009-12-30 19:54:25

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#473 2009-12-30 20:03:00

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#474 2009-12-30 20:26:26

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

#475 2009-12-30 20:30:41

Re: December 2009 Screenshots - Take 3

Board footer