You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#51 2011-04-05 05:37:18
- kahlil88
- Member
- From: Mendocino, CA
- Registered: 2010-08-10
- Posts: 138
- Website
Re: Switching to libjpeg-turbo?
jpegoptim no longer works after installing libjpeg-turbo -- does anyone know of an alternative lossless JPEG optimization program, or perhaps a solution to making them play nice?
There is no system but GNU and Linux is one of its kernels.
Offline
#52 2011-04-05 08:52:44
- kazuo
- Member
- From: São Paulo/Brazil
- Registered: 2008-03-18
- Posts: 413
- Website
Re: Switching to libjpeg-turbo?
I use the jpgcrush, the logic is in perl and its use the jpegtran (from libjpeg/libjpeg-turbo so no extra binaries).
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41381
More info (if the 0.0.0-2 put you alway): http://doom10.org/index.php?topic=711.0
Offline
#53 2011-04-17 10:12:03
- kahlil88
- Member
- From: Mendocino, CA
- Registered: 2010-08-10
- Posts: 138
- Website
Re: Switching to libjpeg-turbo?
I use the jpgcrush, the logic is in perl and its use the jpegtran (from libjpeg/libjpeg-turbo so no extra binaries).
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41381
More info (if the 0.0.0-2 put you alway): http://doom10.org/index.php?topic=711.0
It seems to strip away metadata, but otherwise I like it.
There is no system but GNU and Linux is one of its kernels.
Offline
#54 2011-04-17 16:19:58
- kazuo
- Member
- From: São Paulo/Brazil
- Registered: 2008-03-18
- Posts: 413
- Website
Re: Switching to libjpeg-turbo?
kazuo wrote:I use the jpgcrush, the logic is in perl and its use the jpegtran (from libjpeg/libjpeg-turbo so no extra binaries).
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41381
More info (if the 0.0.0-2 put you alway): http://doom10.org/index.php?topic=711.0
It seems to strip away metadata, but otherwise I like it.
Yes, but I use exiv2 to put it again (i.e. I run exiv2 extract before and exiv2 insert after). Put in a litle bash/sh/zsh wraper the and you are done.
Offline