You are not logged in.
error: directive 'Server' with a value not recognized
error: config file /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist, line 274: problem in options section
error: failed retrieving file
Comment off line 274 in the mirrorlist and the next uncommented line is the problem, no matter what I'm trying to install or remove.
Offline
Post your pacman.conf and mirrorlist files for us to have a look at.
Offline
I'm new to arch and pacman, but I've been a linux user for years. I installed archlinux a week or two ago and I have been adding and deleting various packages with pacman with no issues until today.
I won't waste space here with the entire mirrorlist, but here is an example line where the error occurs of the line is uncommented...
#Server = http://mirrors.xmission.com/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
and here is the /etc/pacman.conf file...
#
# /etc/pacman.conf
#
# See the pacman.conf(5) manpage for option and repository directives
#
# GENERAL OPTIONS
#
[options]
# The following paths are commented out with their default values listed.
# If you wish to use different paths, uncomment and update the paths.
#RootDir = /
#DBPath = /var/lib/pacman/
#CacheDir = /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
#LogFile = /var/log/pacman.log
HoldPkg = pacman glibc
# If upgrades are available for these packages they will be asked for first
SyncFirst = pacman
#XferCommand = /usr/bin/wget --passive-ftp -c -O %o %u
#XferCommand = /usr/bin/curl -C - %u > %o
#CleanMethod = KeepInstalled
Architecture = auto
# Pacman won't upgrade packages listed in IgnorePkg and members of IgnoreGroup
#IgnorePkg =
#IgnoreGroup =
#NoUpgrade =
#NoExtract =
# Misc options (all disabled by default)
#UseSyslog
#ShowSize
#UseDelta
#TotalDownload
#
# REPOSITORIES
# - can be defined here or included from another file
# - pacman will search repositories in the order defined here
# - local/custom mirrors can be added here or in separate files
# - repositories listed first will take precedence when packages
# have identical names, regardless of version number
# - URLs will have $repo replaced by the name of the current repo
# - URLs will have $arch replaced by the name of the architecture
#
# Repository entries are of the format:
# [repo-name]
# Server = ServerName
# Include = IncludePath
#
# The header [repo-name] is crucial - it must be present and
# uncommented to enable the repo.
#
# The testing repositories are disabled by default. To enable, uncomment the
# repo name header and Include lines. You can add preferred servers immediately
# after the header, and they will be used before the default mirrors.
#[testing]
## Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
[core]
# Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
[extra]
# Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
#[community-testing]
## Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
#Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
[community]
# Add your preferred servers here, they will be used first
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
# An example of a custom package repository. See the pacman manpage for
# tips on creating your own repositories.
#[custom]
#Server = file:///home/custompkgs
Offline
I won't waste space here with the entire mirrorlist, but here is an example line where the error occurs of the line is uncommented...
#Server = http://mirrors.xmission.com/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
That looks commented to me...
Offline
Maybe you should uncomment [testing] - the header.
Edit: The Man (tm) agrees http://readlist.com/lists/archlinux.org … 15780.html
Last edited by karol (2010-06-30 01:33:29)
Offline
error: directive 'Server' with a value not recognized
error: config file /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist, line 258: problem in options section
resolving dependencies...
Here is line 258
Server = http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/linux/d … o/os/$arch
Offline
Hey, man, did you read my post? If you _did_ uncomment the header, please post that you did.
Offline
I was attempting to turn on the Testing section...I see now. I'm unfamiliar with pacman's configuration directives. Thanks, that one fixed it. Now if I can just get motion to record properly...some codecs missing...
Offline
> I'm unfamiliar with pacman's configuration directives.
You should have read the wiki: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman#Repositories
BTW, are you sure you know what you're doing by enabling testing?
Offline
I was looking for an ffmpeg download which didn't report as corrupted. I will probably turn testing back off now.
Offline
I am more familiar with apt-get, aptitude and synaptic, but this will eventually make sense.
Offline
> I was looking for an ffmpeg download which didn't report as corrupted.
Sorry, but I classify that as "I don't know what does the testing repo mean".
Offline
I do know what the "testing" repo means. I was hoping that the ffmpeg package was in a state of flux and that maybe the testing version would at least download correctly. Just a shot in the dark...a bit like enabling backports repositories in a Debian based system.
Offline
Most of my professional career has been spent with applications software in a variety of systems from the old Z80 based CPM machines to OS MVS mainframe computers and a variety of others in between. I have been using/touching *nix like systems since the SCO XENIX days, but when I find a new (to me) distribution, I am prone to try "things" to see how well it works. I have been using Ubuntu for several years now after trying several different distributions, looking for a stable, usable OS for my main laptop computer upon which to run virtual computers of M$ OS's in order to interface with my clients. I am not happy with the direction Ubuntu is going, a it appears that they are attempting to compete directly with Win7 (which I hope to avoid having to use indefinitely). I have done unix sysadmin for HPUX systems and Sun OS (back before they dubbed it "Solaris"), but it is far from my main focus area.
Offline
> I am prone to try "things" to see how well it works.
If you would kindly read first, try later, it would save us all some time.
Offline
Perhaps, but then I wouldn't get introduced to all you wonderful people. ![]()
Offline