Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

SanskritFritz · 2010-09-15 21:11:22

Just want to know. Was it not updated? Archlinux favors ufw rather? No developer interest?

schuay · 2010-09-15 21:48:53

http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/ … 09216.html

I'd be willing to take it to [community] if its acceptable to others (being built from a cvs snapshot).

SanskritFritz · 2010-09-16 07:22:48

That would be nice, thank you.
BTW, in the message you linked, there is a statement, that with the latest version, the get-iana.sh script works. I installed firehol from the aur, but get-iana.sh doesnt work for me. Is it important? Firehol seems to work flawlessly without it.

schuay · 2010-09-16 09:59:31

SanskritFritz wrote:

I installed firehol from the aur, but get-iana.sh doesnt work for me.

I just checked and it seems to work for me, what happens when you run it?

SanskritFritz · 2010-09-16 10:56:09

I checked it too now, and miraculously it is working now. Maybe a hiccup on the server. Anyways, thanks for checking it.
So, please put the package back to [community] if you have the time

SanskritFritz · 2010-09-29 14:46:37

Thank you for moving it back, schuay.

schuay · 2010-09-29 14:52:08

You're welcome

Arch Linux

#1 2010-09-15 21:11:22

Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

#2 2010-09-15 21:48:53

Re: Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

#3 2010-09-16 07:22:48

Re: Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

#4 2010-09-16 09:59:31

Re: Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

#5 2010-09-16 10:56:09

Re: Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

#6 2010-09-29 14:46:37

Re: Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

#7 2010-09-29 14:52:08

Re: Why was firehol dropped from the community repo?

Board footer