unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

nemesis87 · 2011-03-10 02:19:44

Hi i tried the precompiled kernel from your repo. Sadly i doesn't detect my pata hdd (where arch runs from). I don't know how this is even possible, because the config should be the same as the default arch kernel (wich runs fine).

Any Ideas?

I have a GA-P35-DS3R Mainboard.

Last edited by nemesis87 (2011-03-10 02:20:53)

graysky · 2011-03-10 20:51:01

If you compile it yourself from the AUR, does it detect your pata drive? The repo kernels use the same config files as the AUR does with the BFS enabled.

Viper_Scull · 2011-03-12 18:26:22

Hey graysky, i'm following the steps of your pkgbuild but manually, cause i'm doing some tests over a new installation.
linux 2.6.37.3, patch-2.6.37-ck2 and patch-2.6.37-ck2
I patch the ck2 patch to fix it. I patch the sources with the fixed ck2 patch. OK
then i try to patch the sources with the patch from ARCH:

bary /tmp/linux-2.6.37.3 $ cat arch.txt | grep -i fail
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2822.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/message/fusion/mptctl.c.rej
Hunk #2 FAILED at 468.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 652.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/virtio_net.c.rej
Hunk #3 FAILED at 308.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 539.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 555.
3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/inode.c.rej
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej

and lots of lines skipping patch.

What am i missing?

Last edited by Viper_Scull (2011-03-12 18:26:58)

graysky · 2011-03-12 18:48:21

@viper - please start a new thread or post to the AUR page for kernel26-ck since this one is about repo-specific stuff.

nemesis87 · 2011-03-13 17:20:45

graysky wrote:

If you compile it yourself from the AUR, does it detect your pata drive? The repo kernels use the same config files as the AUR does with the BFS enabled.

No i doesn't work to. But i thought that BFS instead of CFS was the only diffrence to the Arch Stock Kernel.

graysky · 2011-03-13 18:30:41

It is... not sure why your PATA drive isn't getting detected. Post the output of "mkinitcpio -p kernel26-ck" and of "cat /etc/mkinitcpio.conf"

graysky · 2011-03-17 01:59:22

Might be awhile until 2.26.38-ck gets released due to no CK1 patchset for the .38 three-point release. Details: http://ck-hack.blogspot.com

2.6.38 came out faster than I was expecting, and I've made no effort as of yet to port BFS or -ck to it. It looked like there were still bug reports on the last -rc on the linux kernel mailing list so I wasn't expecting the "stable" release to come out yet. Furthermore, I've been working very hard on the next major release of lrzip which is a massive rewrite so that has completely occupied my time and I am not done with it yet. So there will likely be quite some delay before I can release an official BFS/CK for 2.6.38. I also would like to watch what fallout, if any, there is from the autogrouping code and decide what I should do with respect to that feature. I'm sure some unofficial BFS ports will be available soon enough but obviously I won't be able to say with any confidence whether they can be trusted or not.

Last edited by graysky (2011-03-17 02:00:23)

nexxx · 2011-03-17 15:11:14

Hi,

I also have a problem with the nvidia core2 package...

A similar problem was posted before https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 03#p880803

Here is my Xorg LOG

BR
nexxx

graysky · 2011-03-17 20:23:54

nexxx wrote:

Hi,
I also have a problem with the nvidia core2 package...
A similar problem was posted before https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 03#p880803
Here is my Xorg LOG
BR
nexxx

EDIT: My bad... updated the repo. Please try it now.

sudo pacman -Rs nvidia-ck-core2 && sudo pacman -Syy && pacman -S nvidia-ck-core2

It should say the package is corrupt, redownload it and all should be well.

Last edited by graysky (2011-03-17 20:43:01)

nexxx · 2011-03-18 11:32:13

graysky wrote:

nexxx wrote:
Hi,
I also have a problem with the nvidia core2 package...
A similar problem was posted before https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 03#p880803
Here is my Xorg LOG
BR
nexxx
EDIT: My bad... updated the repo. Please try it now.
sudo pacman -Rs nvidia-ck-core2 && sudo pacman -Syy && pacman -S nvidia-ck-core2
It should say the package is corrupt, redownload it and all should be well.

Thanks, i will try it later!

graysky · 2011-03-18 20:36:10

Should be a mute point now that I bumped it to the new version.

Last edited by graysky (2011-03-26 13:59:41)

student975 · 2011-03-31 01:32:13

Must I reinstall lirc-ck and nvidia-ck on every kernel26-ck update?

admiralspark · 2011-03-31 08:31:10

Hey, I'm an i7 user here, I've been using the generic package and tweaking it because I didn't realize you had a separate core2 package. I'd be more than happy to help compile/test if you'd like.
Also, would you mind if I used your builds as a base for a specific package I'd like to put in the AUR? I'm working on building a kernel for the Lenovo Ideapads like mine, and I've had nothing but trouble-free builds from your scripts.
-Kris

graysky · 2011-03-31 21:48:15

@student - as long as it's a three point release, i.e. 2.6.38.x (where x is the only thing that changed), you should NOT need to rebuild either of those with four point releases. I don't rebuild nvidia-ck for the repo... are you needing to do it?

@admiralspark - please feel free - the beauty of open-source

Last edited by graysky (2011-04-01 00:17:21)

student975 · 2011-04-01 03:17:35

@graysky, thanks! - wanted to be sure.

eric · 2011-04-11 14:06:53

I get this when doing 'pacman -S kernel26-ck-k8':

kernel26-ck-k8-2.6...     1,5K  311,8K/s 00:00:00 [######################]   0%
:: File kernel26-ck-k8-2.6.38.2-3-i686.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted. Do you want to delete it? [Y/n]

graysky · 2011-04-11 19:00:17

@eric - sorry, the package had a bad md5sum on the server. I reupped. Please give it a try again.

knedlyk · 2011-04-22 20:21:30

@graysky, I have a problem with kernel26-ck-p4 2.6.38.3-1 from your repo. Namely, my two d-link wifi sticks and one pentagram wifi stick (all rt73usb) can find any wireless network. I rebooted into the stock kernel26 2.6.38.3-1 and everything works fine, all wifi networks around was listed. Rebooted again into kernel26-ck-p4 and got the same sh&t. Bad compiled rt73 modules?

graysky · 2011-04-22 20:34:59

Not sure what to say, knedlyk... what happens if you build kernel26-ck from the AUR? Same problem?

Also, building 2.6.38.4-1 series for the repo now...

knedlyk · 2011-04-22 20:43:16

graysky wrote:

Not sure what to say, knedlyk... what happens if you build kernel26-ck from the AUR? Same problem?
Also, building 2.6.38.4-1 series for the repo now...

Dunno, I don't have enough time to wait until compiling from AUR finishes, that's why I use your repository instead of compiling myself...

graysky · 2011-04-22 23:33:28

The -4 packages are online now. Please let me know.

knedlyk · 2011-04-26 16:57:11

Sorry, It doesn't work either.

graysky · 2011-04-26 20:19:00

Not sure what to conclude. If you can't build the package from the AUR and report back, I can't know if it's something I'm doing or if it's something the patchset is doing.

knedlyk · 2011-04-28 21:33:24

graysky wrote:

Not sure what to conclude. If you can't build the package from the AUR and report back, I can't know if it's something I'm doing or if it's something the patchset is doing.

I built the kernel package from AUR (with P4 option in config and ), and wifi works perfectly fine with rt73usb module.
I can conclude that something wrong is in your machine setup or packages (old gcc libs, etc and etc and etc).
It is not a big deal for me to compile the kernel from AUR, it only takes some time to compile (~2 hours) on my box.

graysky · 2011-04-28 22:22:52

@knedlyk - hmmm.... good feedback.

1) Please post the output of:

$ cat /etc/makepkg.conf | grep FLAG

And

$ gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target

2) If you use the generic i686 package from the repo, does your wireless work?

Last edited by graysky (2011-04-28 22:23:43)

Arch Linux

#151 2011-03-10 02:19:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#152 2011-03-10 20:51:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#153 2011-03-12 18:26:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#154 2011-03-12 18:48:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#155 2011-03-13 17:20:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#156 2011-03-13 18:30:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#157 2011-03-17 01:59:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#158 2011-03-17 15:11:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#159 2011-03-17 20:23:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#160 2011-03-18 11:32:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#161 2011-03-18 20:36:10

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#162 2011-03-31 01:32:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#163 2011-03-31 08:31:10

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#164 2011-03-31 21:48:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#165 2011-04-01 03:17:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#166 2011-04-11 14:06:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#167 2011-04-11 19:00:17

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#168 2011-04-22 20:21:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#169 2011-04-22 20:34:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#170 2011-04-22 20:43:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#171 2011-04-22 23:33:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#172 2011-04-26 16:57:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#173 2011-04-26 20:19:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#174 2011-04-28 21:33:24

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#175 2011-04-28 22:22:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer