unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

runical · 2015-04-04 09:37:39

Please do some research. You know your hardware and you know which drivers you need for the normal linux kernel. Since these packages are recompiled for the linux-ck kernel, you should only install that what you already use.

Риал Краесис · 2015-04-04 14:55:28

just installed and every thing seems good.
will report if any problem or bug encountered.
uname -a:
Linux fouruhar 3.19.3-1-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Mar 26 16:04:32 EDT 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux

kfiz · 2015-04-09 10:10:30

Hi Graysky,
could you build a package set for broadwell processors?

Cheers

runical · 2015-04-09 14:29:37

Isn't Broadwell just a shrunk Haswell? The wikipedia page does list it as Haswell, so my guess is that Haswell should work just fine.

What is the output of:

gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march

kfiz · 2015-04-09 15:24:33

runical wrote:

Isn't Broadwell just a shrunk Haswell? The wikipedia page does list it as Haswell, so my guess is that Haswell should work just fine.
What is the output of:
gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march

Running:

gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march

gives:

 [louis@arch ~]$ gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march

  -march=                     		broadwell

But you're right, Broadwell is a shrunk Haswell. A tick in Intels tick-tock cycle.

Last edited by kfiz (2015-04-09 15:28:30)

indianahorst · 2015-04-09 19:50:41

Since yesterday I get the following error when updating with pacman:

 linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2-x86_64                  111,7 MiB  2,60M/s 00:43 [#######################################]  94%
 linux-ck-kx-headers-3.19.3-2-x86_64          117,9 MiB  2,60M/s 00:45 [#######################################] 100%
(6/6) checking keys in keyring                                         [#######################################] 100%
(6/6) checking package integrity                                       [#######################################] 100%
error: linux-ck-kx: missing required signature
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package)
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

Does anybody get this errors too?

graysky · 2015-04-09 20:46:00

@indianahorst - That is very odd, one of my sig files is a 0-byte file. I have deleted it and re-signed it now. Please try again.

cowlick · 2015-04-09 21:24:43

Commented out repo-ck and did upgrade. Uncommented repo-ck ans samd problem as indian.

graysky · 2015-04-09 21:27:53

It could be that the 0-byte sig has been saved to your cache. Can you delete it manually and try again?

# rm /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig

cowlick · 2015-04-09 21:37:29

[me@here ~]$ sudo rm /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig
rm: cannot remove ‘/var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig’: No such file or directory
[me@here ~]$

lots of linux-ck files but none with a sig attached.

[me@here ~]$ sudo pacman -Syyu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 core                     121.4 KiB   462K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 extra                   1797.0 KiB   633K/s 00:03 [######################] 100%
 community                  2.6 MiB   718K/s 00:04 [######################] 100%
 multilib                 124.8 KiB  1124K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 repo-ck                   51.8 KiB   467K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
:: Starting full system upgrade...
error: could not parse package description file 'virtualbox-ck-host-modules-k10-4.3.26-2/depends' from db 'repo-ck'
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (3) linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2  linux-ck-kx-headers-3.19.3-2  p7zip-9.38.1-2

Total Download Size:     8.00 MiB
Total Installed Size:  111.96 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:        0.00 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
:: Retrieving packages ...
 p7zip-9.38.1-2-x86_64   1833.1 KiB   587K/s 00:03 [######################] 100%
 linux-ck-kx-headers...     6.2 MiB  1337K/s 00:05 [######################] 100%
(3/3) checking keys in keyring                     [######################] 100%
(3/3) checking package integrity                   [######################] 100%
error: linux-ck-kx: missing required signature
error: linux-ck-kx-headers: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is unknown trust
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-kx-headers-3.19.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).

Last edited by cowlick (2015-04-09 21:41:19)

graysky · 2015-04-09 21:45:26

I have just reindexed the repo. Please `pacman -Syy` then try again

graysky · 2015-04-09 21:46:47

kfiz wrote:

could you build a package set for broadwell processors?

Done, please try it and report back.

# pacman -S ck-broadwell
:: There are 8 members in group ck-broadwell:
:: Repository repo-ck
   1) broadcom-wl-ck-broadwell  2) linux-ck-broadwell  3) linux-ck-broadwell-headers  4) nvidia-304xx-ck-broadwell
   5) nvidia-340xx-ck-broadwell  6) nvidia-ck-broadwell  7) virtualbox-ck-guest-modules-broadwell
   8) virtualbox-ck-host-modules-broadwell

Enter a selection (default=all):

cowlick · 2015-04-09 21:51:45

[me@here ~]$ sudo pacman -Syy
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 core                     121.4 KiB   462K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 extra                   1797.0 KiB   626K/s 00:03 [######################] 100%
 community                  2.6 MiB   656K/s 00:04 [######################] 100%
 multilib                 124.8 KiB  1114K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 repo-ck                   51.8 KiB   471K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
[me@here ~]$ sudo pacman -Syyu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 core                     121.4 KiB   458K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 extra                   1797.0 KiB   744K/s 00:02 [######################] 100%
 community                  2.6 MiB   738K/s 00:04 [######################] 100%
 multilib                 124.8 KiB  1085K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 repo-ck                   51.8 KiB   463K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (3) linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2  linux-ck-kx-headers-3.19.3-2  p7zip-9.38.1-2

Total Download Size:    61.70 MiB
Total Installed Size:  111.96 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:        0.00 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
:: Retrieving packages ...
 linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-...    55.5 MiB  1508K/s 00:38 [######################] 100%
 linux-ck-kx-headers...     6.2 MiB  1101K/s 00:06 [######################] 100%
(3/3) checking keys in keyring                     [######################] 100%
(3/3) checking package integrity                   [######################] 100%
error: linux-ck-kx: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is unknown trust
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).

[me@here ~]$ sudo pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C
gpg: key 5EE46C4C: "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:              unchanged: 1
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2016-01-22
[me@here ~]$ sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C
  -> Locally signing key 5EE46C4C...
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
gpg: depth: 0  valid:   1  signed:   6  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
gpg: depth: 1  valid:   6  signed:  62  trust: 1-, 0q, 0n, 5m, 0f, 0u
gpg: depth: 2  valid:  62  signed:   5  trust: 62-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2016-01-22

[me@here ~]$ sudo pacman -Syyu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 core                     121.4 KiB   310K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 extra                   1797.0 KiB   516K/s 00:03 [######################] 100%
 community                  2.6 MiB   727K/s 00:04 [######################] 100%
 multilib                 124.8 KiB  1134K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
 repo-ck                   51.8 KiB   463K/s 00:00 [######################] 100%
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (3) linux-ck-kx-3.19.3-2  linux-ck-kx-headers-3.19.3-2  p7zip-9.38.1-2

Total Installed Size:  111.96 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:        0.00 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
(3/3) checking keys in keyring                     [######################] 100%
(3/3) checking package integrity                   [######################] 100%
(3/3) loading package files                        [######################] 100%
(3/3) checking for file conflicts                  [######################] 100%
(3/3) checking available disk space                [######################] 100%
(1/3) upgrading linux-ck-kx                        [######################] 100%
 blah, blah, blah
==> Image generation successful
(2/3) upgrading linux-ck-kx-headers                [######################] 100%
(3/3) upgrading p7zip

success, God bless you.

Last edited by cowlick (2015-04-09 22:06:09)

tekstryder · 2015-04-10 00:30:39

graysky wrote:

kfiz wrote:
could you build a package set for broadwell processors?
Done, please try it and report back.

Thanks so much @graysky!

Lenovo X1 Carbon is very happy to have the new build!

$ uname -a
Linux algernop 3.19.3-2-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Apr 9 17:25:23 EDT 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux

$ pacman -Qi linux-ck-broadwell
Name           : linux-ck-broadwell
Version        : 3.19.3-2
Description    : Linux Kernel and modules with the ck1 patchset featuring the Brain Fuck Scheduler v0.461. Fifth Gen Intel Core i3/i5/i7 optimized.
Architecture   : x86_64

Virtualbox modules working fine too with my Win8.1 VM

Thanks again.

kfiz · 2015-04-10 03:58:57

graysky wrote:

kfiz wrote:

could you build a package set for broadwell processors?

Done, please try it and report back.

# pacman -S ck-broadwell
:: There are 8 members in group ck-broadwell:
:: Repository repo-ck
   1) broadcom-wl-ck-broadwell  2) linux-ck-broadwell  3) linux-ck-broadwell-headers  4) nvidia-304xx-ck-broadwell
   5) nvidia-340xx-ck-broadwell  6) nvidia-ck-broadwell  7) virtualbox-ck-guest-modules-broadwell
   8) virtualbox-ck-host-modules-broadwell

Enter a selection (default=all):

Works on a Macbook Pro early 2015. Thanks!

indianahorst · 2015-04-10 14:36:17

graysky wrote:

@indianahorst - That is very odd, one of my sig files is a 0-byte file. I have deleted it and re-signed it now. Please try again.

Thank you, update worked flawlessly now!

grondinm · 2015-04-23 19:08:15

so i hate to ask but update to 4.0 is coming?

clfarron4 · 2015-04-23 19:44:07

grondinm wrote:

so i hate to ask but update to 4.0 is coming?

Soon. He has some other packages in the works from the AUR comments on the page.

graysky · 2015-04-23 20:14:30

Hold up is the broadcom-wl package. It does not build cleanly against 4.0 and I don't have time to search fedora or gentoo or google to find the patch for it. If one of you guys can do it, it will speed the 4.0 release up.

mauritiusdadd · 2015-04-24 05:54:19

Hi graysky,
I found a patch from the maintainer of the AUR package broadcom-wl-dkms, maybe it can be useful.

PS: thank you very much for the repo

graysky · 2015-04-24 08:39:37

Does it apply cleanly and give a functional module? I tired it last night and found that it didn't apply, but I didn't inspect the two source tarballs due to a lack of time. Are they the same?

mauritiusdadd · 2015-04-24 09:04:42

graysky wrote:

Does it apply cleanly and give a functional module? I tired it last night and found that it didn't apply, but I didn't inspect the two source tarballs due to a lack of time. Are they the same?

The sources are the same (same urls and same checksums) but I've not tried to build it yet. I will try to apply the patch but I can not test if the module is functional because I do not use broadcom-wl drivers.

-- edit:

The patch applies cleanly and it includes also (and conflicts with) the following patches:

unfuck.patch : slightly different, you may want to check the differences.
broadcom-sta-6.30.223.248-linux-3.18-null-pointer-crash.patch : identical.

I also tried to build the patched broadcom-wl-ck in a clean chroot using linux-ck-4.0 (I've stolen it from the next branch of your repo ) and it worked.

Last edited by mauritiusdadd (2015-04-24 12:41:20)

grondinm · 2015-04-24 12:34:39

graysky wrote:

Hold up is the broadcom-wl package. It does not build cleanly against 4.0 and I don't have time to search fedora or gentoo or google to find the patch for it. If one of you guys can do it, it will speed the 4.0 release up.

Thank you for the update and all your work.

graysky · 2015-04-24 12:57:21

@mauritiusdadd - thank you for the deeper analysis. I will dig in when I am able today and push some packages to the AUR for user feedback.

Last edited by graysky (2015-04-24 12:57:37)

grondinm · 2015-04-24 19:02:41

I wonder if you would consider adding this patch

https://groups.google.com/group/bfq-ios … authuser=0

When i use BFQ i get random lock ups and this patch seems to fix this issue

Last edited by grondinm (2015-04-24 19:10:54)

Arch Linux

#2226 2015-04-04 09:37:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2227 2015-04-04 14:55:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2228 2015-04-09 10:10:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2229 2015-04-09 14:29:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2230 2015-04-09 15:24:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2231 2015-04-09 19:50:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2232 2015-04-09 20:46:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2233 2015-04-09 21:24:43

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2234 2015-04-09 21:27:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2235 2015-04-09 21:37:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2236 2015-04-09 21:45:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2237 2015-04-09 21:46:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2238 2015-04-09 21:51:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2239 2015-04-10 00:30:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2240 2015-04-10 03:58:57

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2241 2015-04-10 14:36:17

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2242 2015-04-23 19:08:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2243 2015-04-23 19:44:07

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2244 2015-04-23 20:14:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2245 2015-04-24 05:54:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2246 2015-04-24 08:39:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2247 2015-04-24 09:04:42

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2248 2015-04-24 12:34:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2249 2015-04-24 12:57:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2250 2015-04-24 19:02:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer