pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

sbfreak · 2011-03-20 10:41:14

Is there any aur tool similar to yaourt that has support for pacman 3.5?

jolinfire · 2011-03-20 11:24:25

Looks like yaourt is working on new pacman version :

http://gitweb.archlinux.fr/yaourt.git/log/

http://gitweb.archlinux.fr/yaourt.git/c … 13a22545a4

Xabre · 2011-03-20 12:00:21

Aurget works just fine.

ANOKNUSA · 2011-03-20 18:25:35

I'm gonna go out on a limb and bet that after Pacman 3.5 hits the [core] repo later this week, all the wrappers will be updated.

Wintervenom · 2011-03-20 18:37:11

Cower.

sbfreak · 2011-03-20 21:27:18

Thanks for all the suggestions.I managed to get things done with with aurget.

mhertz · 2011-03-20 22:10:40

Packer also works great, which is a small and fast bash script which adds seamless aur support to package installing, updating and searching, but dosen't support things like removing or querying packages etc., since that isn't aur related and hence, pacman should simply be used for that, instead of the aur wrapper sending those options straight back to pacman anyways!

ngoonee · 2011-03-20 23:01:31

ANOKNUSA wrote:

I'm gonna go out on a limb and bet that after Pacman 3.5 hits the [core] repo later this week, all the wrappers will be updated.

bauerbill at least won't (based on its thread). Pity, it has the best feature-set in my opinion.

Mr.Elendig · 2011-03-21 14:31:18

cower is pretty much superiour to anything else, and have a high chance of being kept up to date with the pacman. Slurpy is partially broken with 3.5 and I haven't decided yet if I'm going to update it or not.

Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2011-03-22 11:41:12)

skottish · 2011-03-22 02:31:01

Mr.Elendig wrote:

cower is pretty much superiour to anything else, and have a high chance of being kept up to date with the pacman. Slurpy is partly broken with 3.5 and I haven't decided yet if I'm going to update it or not.

Thanks Mr.Elendig. I found myself looking for one of these in the last couple of days. I like it a lot.

Last edited by skottish (2011-03-22 02:31:49)

trapanator · 2011-03-22 04:36:56

where is cower???

Allan · 2011-03-22 04:41:36

trapanator wrote:

where is cower???

Same place every AUR helper utility is... in the AUR

Mr.Elendig · 2011-03-22 11:42:02

trapanator wrote:

where is cower???

For those too lazy to search..

trapanator · 2011-03-22 12:01:46

sorry to everybody.

I used google "cower aur", BUT google show me results of "cover aur" and I didn't find the AUR package in first 10 entries...

ngoonee · 2011-03-22 14:26:29

trapanator wrote:

sorry to everybody.
I used google "cower aur", BUT google show me results of "cover aur" and I didn't find the AUR package in first 10 entries...

They also prominently display that the spelling has been corrected and give a link (right at the top of the page) to the spelling you actually typed....

jdarnold · 2011-03-22 15:28:13

Don't use google to search the AUR - just use the AUR search box. Works much better!

jdarnold · 2011-03-22 15:29:24

I too am saddened by the imminent demise of bauerbill. It's really been a great tool and I'd hate to see it go. I particularly like how it is command compatible with pacman.

But perhaps I'll check out cower.

Last edited by jdarnold (2011-03-22 16:01:44)

SanskritFritz · 2011-03-22 15:34:51

What about clyde, does anyone know?
I'm mourning too over bauerbill

Mr.Elendig · 2011-03-22 17:46:10

SanskritFritz wrote:

What about clyde, does anyone know?

github knows

SanskritFritz · 2011-03-22 21:15:40

Github might know, but I still dont.

ngoonee · 2011-03-22 23:52:12

SanskritFritz wrote:

Github might know, but I still dont.

Github and you are not on speaking terms, I take it?

falconindy · 2011-03-22 23:54:29

I think the implication is that it's unclear just from seeing the repo unless you know what to look for. Judging by the most recent commit being March 3rd (and having spoken to Kiwi), I'd say he still hasn't gotten around to it.

SanskritFritz · 2011-03-22 23:58:48

Thanks falconindy that was a bit more clear.

SanskritFritz · 2011-03-23 08:24:00

ngoonee wrote:

SanskritFritz wrote:
Github might know, but I still dont.
Github and you are not on speaking terms, I take it?

Eheheh, well, I thought there is some very important information buried somewhere in the log. Hence the frustration

bcat · 2011-03-24 23:57:33

falconindy wrote:

I think the implication is that it's unclear just from seeing the repo unless you know what to look for. Judging by the most recent commit being March 3rd (and having spoken to Kiwi), I'd say he still hasn't gotten around to it.

FWIW, it looks like there's some pacman 3.5 work going on in a separate branch.

Arch Linux

#1 2011-03-20 10:41:14

pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#2 2011-03-20 11:24:25

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#3 2011-03-20 12:00:21

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#4 2011-03-20 18:25:35

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#5 2011-03-20 18:37:11

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#6 2011-03-20 21:27:18

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#7 2011-03-20 22:10:40

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#8 2011-03-20 23:01:31

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#9 2011-03-21 14:31:18

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#10 2011-03-22 02:31:01

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#11 2011-03-22 04:36:56

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#12 2011-03-22 04:41:36

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#13 2011-03-22 11:42:02

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#14 2011-03-22 12:01:46

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#15 2011-03-22 14:26:29

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#16 2011-03-22 15:28:13

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#17 2011-03-22 15:29:24

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#18 2011-03-22 15:34:51

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#19 2011-03-22 17:46:10

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#20 2011-03-22 21:15:40

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#21 2011-03-22 23:52:12

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#22 2011-03-22 23:54:29

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#23 2011-03-22 23:58:48

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#24 2011-03-23 08:24:00

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

#25 2011-03-24 23:57:33

Re: pacman 3.5 aur wrapper

Board footer