You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
Topic closed
#1 2011-03-26 12:06:47
- stolowski
- Member
- From: Poland, Bydgoszcz
- Registered: 2009-09-23
- Posts: 18
- Website
Why so few (none?) packages have changelogs?
Pacman supports package changelogs (via pacman -Qc ...), but very few (if any) packages seem to provide it. I think it would be very useful and desired at least for crucial packages, e.g. kernel. In some cases it could be extracted from the upstream changelog (e.g. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/ … -2.6.37.5).
Is there any reason that changelogs are not really provided by Arch packages?
Offline
#2 2011-03-26 12:08:13
- litemotiv
- Forum Fellow
- Registered: 2008-08-01
- Posts: 5,026
Re: Why so few (none?) packages have changelogs?
See this: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70557
Closing for duplication.
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed