You are not logged in.
I know Pandora is far from the most efficient software out there, but in Chromium it takes roughly 1.6 GHz of CPU cycles, compared to 260 MHz in Firefox. Same version of Flash (64 bit preview). I was hoping to switch from Firefox to Chromium as it seems to be faster overall, but draining my laptop's battery like this is a show-stopper.
chromium 10.0.648.205-1
xorg-server 1.10.1-1
xf86-video-ati 6.14.1-1
Firefox 4.0 (64-bit) from upstream
Adobe Flash 10.3 d162 (64-bit preview)
With Chromium:
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) (45.4%) 2.00 Ghz 100.0%
polling 0.4ms ( 0.1%) 1.60 Ghz 0.0%
C1 mwait 0.2ms (26.9%) 1200 Mhz 0.0%
C4 mwait 0.2ms (27.6%)
Top causes for wakeups:
65.4% (1557.0) [radeon] <interrupt>
12.5% (297.2) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick
12.4% (295.4) kworker/0:0
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3609 john 20 0 455m 131m 20m S 50.2 3.3 1:40.29 chromium
3151 root 20 0 115m 32m 15m R 30.6 0.8 1:06.56 X
With Firefox:
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) (19.6%) 2.00 Ghz 0.0%
polling 2.3ms ( 0.0%) 1.60 Ghz 0.0%
C1 mwait 0.7ms ( 5.9%) 1200 Mhz 100.0%
C4 mwait 1.0ms (74.4%)
Top causes for wakeups:
29.8% (192.6) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick
26.3% (170.1) kworker/0:0
15.6% (100.8) firefox-bin
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3860 john 20 0 709m 220m 37m S 22.0 5.6 0:29.94 firefox-bin
3151 root 20 0 110m 25m 8472 S 1.7 0.6 1:55.23 X
Last edited by jlindgren (2011-04-18 23:25:06)
Offline
do you have plugins in firefox that might prevent the page from loading things that are being loaded in Chromium?
I laugh, yet the joke is on me
Offline
I had ad blockers enabled in both browsers. Disabling these made no difference. (Video ads are not in the question here, if that's what you were aiming at; they are blocked by a proxy server.)
Offline
I'll test them out when I get home. I haven't noticed it before, but I don't often go to pandora on my computer. Have you noticed similar behavior at any other websites?
I laugh, yet the joke is on me
Offline
It seems to be only Pandora. Just tried playing a 360p YouTube video in both Chromium and Firefox; the CPU usage was about equal.
Offline
The almost exact 100 wakeups per second makes me wonder if Pandora tries to redraw constantly but gets throttled to 100 FPS in Firefox.
Edit: Okay, I guess I should have done a little more research before posting here; seems to be a known problem with Pandora and Chromium (on Windows and Mac also (!)):
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issue … l?id=38794
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issue … l?id=77691
http://superuser.com/questions/149230/w … -cpu-usage
http://hintsforums.macworld.com/showthread.php?p=617863
Last edited by jlindgren (2011-04-19 01:42:57)
Offline
Interesting. Thanks for the research and links.
I laugh, yet the joke is on me
Offline