You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1 2011-05-07 01:18:07
- taylorchu
- Member
- Registered: 2010-08-09
- Posts: 405
moving from heimdal to krb5, but why?
I saw the mailing talking about moving from heimdal to krb5.
Is there going to any difference? is krb5 better? if so, why?
"After you do enough distro research, you will choose Arch."
Offline
#2 2011-05-07 02:20:00
- ataraxia
- Member
- From: Pittsburgh
- Registered: 2007-05-06
- Posts: 1,553
Re: moving from heimdal to krb5, but why?
I think heimdal isn't much maintained upstream these days, but MIT krb5 is. It's unfortunate, since heimdal was always the one with the features. In the current situation, I agree with the move.
It's also nice that more software supports MIT's API than heimdal's.
Offline
#3 2011-05-07 02:38:41
- Allan
- Pacman
- From: Brisbane, AU
- Registered: 2007-06-09
- Posts: 11,400
- Website
Re: moving from heimdal to krb5, but why?
The talk on the mailing list did describe why...
Offline
#4 2011-05-13 08:41:28
- giddie
- Member
- From: Birmingham, UK
- Registered: 2009-03-25
- Posts: 125
Re: moving from heimdal to krb5, but why?
For those that, like me, want to read some of the reasoning behind the change, the best information I could find on this was here:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/ … 19845.html
Are there any other posts that help explain the move?
Offline