You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
Hi,
will systemd be integrated as default in arch and if yes how long should this take?
Regards
Offline
Offline
They currently have no plans to, and personally after my brief foray with systemd I decided I just like the simplicity of sysvinit better, don't need to mess around with it as much.
And when I tried systemd on my laptop it didn't really give me any boot time improvements (and yes I had my system set up as a "pure" systemd system, using its native config files and units, and removing the arch units) It probably has much more benefits if you have an ssd drive. On my 5400rpm laptop drive just backgrounding daemons and using e4rat gives me 21 seconds to a responsive gnome-shell desktop.
Offline
They currently have no plans to, and personally after my brief foray with systemd I decided I just like the simplicity of sysvinit better, don't need to mess around with it as much.
I don't know what's so simple in sysvinit. I found systemd much more transparent and nicer than bloated and ugly sysvinit scripts.
And when I tried systemd on my laptop it didn't really give me any boot time improvements (and yes I had my system set up as a "pure" systemd system, using its native config files and units, and removing the arch units) It probably has much more benefits if you have an ssd drive. On my 5400rpm laptop drive just backgrounding daemons and using e4rat gives me 21 seconds to a responsive gnome-shell desktop.
Strange, last time I tried it on my PC I get huge boost and I don't use SSD.
Last edited by Pawlerson (2011-12-11 11:27:38)
Offline
Full ACK.
Offline
I'm closing this. The answer is "no" or "not in the foreseeable future" each time anyone brings this up. Discussions on the merits of systemd should go in the main systemd thread. Thanks.
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed