2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

tomk · 2005-06-27 20:21:21

... there's a problem with the ALSA emu10k driver. It's top of the cko known issues list, as follows:

cko wrote:

Add missing files for emu10k alsa sound driver (patch, provided by Peter Hicks)

As I'm not (yet) an expert in this kind of thing, I have to ask - is this a patch for a patch? Do I apply 2.6.12-cko1-emu10k.patch to patch-2.6.12-cko1, and then apply the whole thing to the vanilla source? Or should I just be patient and wait for -cko2?

CyberTron · 2005-06-27 20:30:21

i am certanly no expert at this either, but my vote would be to first apply the cko1 patch to vanilla, then patch vanilla-cko1 with the second patch

dtw · 2005-06-27 21:15:38

that's correct - thanks for the heads up tomk! been waiting for that too

ezar · 2005-06-28 05:00:56

LD sound/i2c/other/built-in.o
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `sound/i2c/other/ak4114.s', needed by `sound/i2c/other/ak4114.o'. Stop.
make[2]: *** [sound/i2c/other] Error 2
make[1]: *** [sound/i2c] Error 2
make: *** [sound] Error 2
==> ERROR: Build Failed. Aborting...

Somebody has similar problem?

tomk · 2005-06-28 10:56:56

Not me anyway, ezar - my 2.6.12-cko1 is fine now, after applying the additional emu10k patch. Thanks for the advice, CyberTron and dibble - worked a treat.

CyberTron · 2005-06-28 11:16:59

my cko-1 is working great too..

dtw · 2005-06-28 11:50:13

i'm going to try and patch in swsusp2 2.1.9 if anyone is inetersted?

CyberTron · 2005-06-28 12:11:22

that would be very nice

dtw · 2005-06-28 16:34:38

ok - i have managed to hack -cko1 to patch with -swsusp2 2.1.9.5 rather than the other way around - it was a lot easier that way - i only got 4 failed hunks patching swp then cko

It's trying to build now - if it builds ok i'll post up the modified -cko patch and the PKGBUILD I used to build it. If people then test it and it still works I'm might do a rebuild with a modified stock arch config as discussed in the -ckarch thread and maybe put it in [community]

CyberTron · 2005-06-28 16:36:10

sounds excellent mate

i am looking forward to it *waiting*

phrakture · 2005-06-28 16:49:35

yes, cko with swsup2 would be great (I couldn't get it working with 2.6.11)

dtw · 2005-06-28 20:03:51

I have been thwarted by this file:

sound/i2c/other/ak4114

-cko1 deletes it, -swsusp2 modifies it and i don't really know what to do. Thelast hunk of the patch, as it is now, deletes linux-2.6.12/sound/i2c/other/ak4114.c

Before that I just stopped -cko patch from changing it at all and i think that failed too

patch and PKGBUILD are here

phrakture · 2005-06-28 20:08:59

hmmm did you try swsup2 then cko?

CyberTron · 2005-06-28 20:21:58

*trying your kernelbuild now*

we'll see what happens *i'll vie an update soon*

UPDATE: Problems during what I believe are some of the later steps in the building process
seems to be a problem with dnddomainname and it seem to be some more trouble with suspend crypto something

  CC      arch/i386/lib/usercopy.o
  AR      arch/i386/lib/lib.a
  GEN     .version
  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
dnsdomainname: Unknown host
  UPD     include/linux/compile.h
  CC      init/version.o
  LD      init/built-in.o
  LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x2112e): In function `freeze_threads':
: undefined reference to `show_task'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x28800): In function `suspend2_crypto_cleanup':
: undefined reference to `crypto_free_tfm'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x28828): In function `s2_compress_crypto_prepare':
: undefined reference to `crypto_alloc_tfm'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x290c2): In function `suspend2_crypto_cleanup':
: undefined reference to `crypto_free_tfm'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x2910d): In function `s2_encrypt_crypto_prepare':
: undefined reference to `crypto_alloc_tfm'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

tomk · 2005-06-28 22:21:25

dibblethewrecker wrote:

I have been thwarted by this file:
sound/i2c/other/ak4114
-cko1 deletes it

Well, at least that explains ezar's problem:

ezar wrote:

LD      sound/i2c/other/built-in.o
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `sound/i2c/other/ak4114.s', needed by `sound/i2c/other/ak4114.o'.  Stop.
make[2]: *** [sound/i2c/other] Error 2
make[1]: *** [sound/i2c] Error 2
make: *** [sound] Error 2
==> ERROR: Build Failed.  Aborting...

I'm afraid I don't know enough about this to suggest a solution, though.

dtw · 2005-06-28 23:04:20

tomk - i guess that is good news! it's not my patching after all then! i think disabling that driver might help - i've had to do that with cko before - but then i think cybertrons problem is gonna screw things - that's from enabling the lzf crypto and compression - it's in the compression section and i think you need it for swsusp2 but you could try disabling it or enableing it if you haven't which might be the problem i guess

iphitus · 2005-06-28 23:40:30

could just disable i2c alltogether, afaik its just hardware sensors and things, nothing essential.

As for software suspend, the patches at the CKO website are still 2.6.11, you'd probably have more luck with the ones on the softwaresuspend site,
http://www.suspend2.net/downloads/

iphitus

dtw · 2005-06-29 08:18:25

yup, that's the one I've been using, iph

CyberTron · 2005-06-29 09:33:54

Can't get it to compile, I enabled lzf encryption, and now it gives me this message:

  GEN     .version
  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
dnsdomainname: Unknown host
  UPD     include/linux/compile.h
  CC      init/version.o
  LD      init/built-in.o
  LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x2112e): In function `freeze_threads':
: undefined reference to `show_task'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

dtw · 2005-06-29 09:59:25

i think we could be screwed then mate! I tried!

CyberTron · 2005-06-29 10:07:48

yes I believe we are...*too bad*

you did great btw *good work to bad it wasn't enough this time*

dtw · 2005-06-29 10:36:35

ther are limits to even MY skill

iphitus · 2005-06-29 11:43:02

whic patches were you trying?

dtw · 2005-06-29 11:45:30

all the info is here

Arch Linux

#1 2005-06-27 20:21:21

2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#2 2005-06-27 20:30:21

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#3 2005-06-27 21:15:38

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#4 2005-06-28 05:00:56

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#5 2005-06-28 10:56:56

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#6 2005-06-28 11:16:59

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#7 2005-06-28 11:50:13

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#8 2005-06-28 12:11:22

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#9 2005-06-28 16:34:38

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#10 2005-06-28 16:36:10

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#11 2005-06-28 16:49:35

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#12 2005-06-28 20:03:51

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#13 2005-06-28 20:08:59

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#14 2005-06-28 20:21:58

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#15 2005-06-28 22:21:25

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#16 2005-06-28 23:04:20

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#17 2005-06-28 23:40:30

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#18 2005-06-29 08:18:25

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#19 2005-06-29 09:33:54

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#20 2005-06-29 09:59:25

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#21 2005-06-29 10:07:48

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#22 2005-06-29 10:36:35

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#23 2005-06-29 11:43:02

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

#24 2005-06-29 11:45:30

Re: 2.6.12-cko1 is now available - but .....

Board footer