You are not logged in.
Seems like the problem described over on the xbmc forums is affecting my box as well. Does this happen for other Archers? The OP over there is running Arch i686 and I can confirm this "bug" on x86_64.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
I've had this issue with xbmc since version 9, between 20-30% idle usage on my atom nettop. It's really annoying, i think it's related to the gui in some way...
edit: here's a post i made over a year ago on their forums about this: http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=89011&page=2
Last edited by litemotiv (2012-04-09 21:24:29)
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
Did both you guys try the Dirty Regions setting? Works pretty fine here (LTS kernel, Eden 11.0).
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I did, B. take a look at that xbmc forum post I referenced. No help with those settings for me.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
I had sleepless night yesterday. When I started my htpc, cpu use was about 100 %. Then I tried move addons folder in ~/.xbmc to addons.save and restarted htpc. With dirty regions enabled my cpu usage was about 9 % while idle. I think problem was in some addon. I am running on x86_64 architecture.
Offline
I did, B. take a look at that xbmc forum post I referenced. No help with those settings for me.
There are more possibilities than just the one posted in that thread.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
I tried clearing the .xbmc directory and starting fresh but had the same result. Did you remove addons from a default install? If so which ones?
EDIT: I did the same as you: moved the plugins dir to plugins-old and found no change in cpu usage. Xbmc did recreate the directory, but it was completely empty.
Last edited by graysky (2012-04-09 23:26:33)
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
Did both you guys try the Dirty Regions setting? Works pretty fine here (LTS kernel, Eden 11.0).
I hadn't enabled dirtyregions yet, i'm now down to 5% cpu load.
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
That's good, no? Graysky, I think it is a bit excessive to claim 6% CPU usage is 'high' (as you do in that thread on the Xbmc forums). Xbmc will always refresh some part of the screen (even with dirty regions). It's all OpenGL.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
That's good, no? Graysky, I think it is a bit excessive to claim 6% CPU usage is 'high' (as you do in that thread on the Xbmc forums). Xbmc will always refresh some part of the screen (even with dirty regions). It's all OpenGL.
Yes it's good i think, i'm running on an Atom 330 so 5% is pretty decent considering the cpu's power/capabilities.
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
My E-350 is similar. I believe it was easily in the 20% range with Dharma (but that was on an AppleTV, which has a Pentium M 1 GHz).
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
That's good, no? Graysky, I think it is a bit excessive to claim 6% CPU usage is 'high' (as you do in that thread on the Xbmc forums). Xbmc will always refresh some part of the screen (even with dirty regions). It's all OpenGL.
6 % is fine but it's ~25 % on that Atom system and 25-30 % on the OP's system from that thread. I would term those numbers as excessive for an application to be idle.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline