You are not logged in.
Hi,
I get the following error message when I try to build either emacs-bzr or emacs-git from aur:
Loading /tmp/packerbuild-1000/emacs-git/emacs-git/src/emacs-build/lisp/image.el (source)...
temacs: magick/exception.c:968: ThrowMagickExceptionList: Assertion `exception->signature == 0xabacadabUL' failed.
/bin/sh: line 5: 10079 Aborted `/bin/pwd`/temacs --batch --load loadup bootstrap
make[2]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/packerbuild-1000/emacs-git/emacs-git/src/emacs-build/src'
make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/packerbuild-1000/emacs-git/emacs-git/src/emacs-build'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2BTW, I googled around for "ThrowMagickExceptionList: Assertion `exception->signature == 0xabacadabUL' failed", and found nothing except a bunch of bug reports years ago.
Is there anyone else who ran into this? How can I solve it? Thanks a lot.
Last edited by WzTian (2012-04-23 19:30:35)
Offline
Same issue here. It fails both on my desktop pc and on my laptop.
I'll stick to the emacs24 package in AUR.
Offline
I'm having this issue on one of my arch machines also. Haven't found a solution yet.
Offline
Same here. No solutions yet?
Last edited by Bruce Connor (2012-04-23 18:46:17)
Offline
Not a real solution, but the error seems to be coming from Imagemagick support in emacs and when I configured like so:
./configure --without-imagemagickIt compiled just fine, though, obviously, without imagemagick support.
Anyway, a temporary workaround…
Eric
Offline
Hi. As I mentioned on the AUR page for emacs-bzr, I was able to build a package with the recipe untouched without problems. I'm at revision 108018, and am linking against GTK+3.
Offline
Hi. As I mentioned on the AUR page for emacs-bzr, I was able to build a package with the recipe untouched without problems. I'm at revision 108018, and am linking against GTK+3.
The problem persists for revision 108048 linking against gtk2.
Offline
You guys all follow [testing]? Because I don't. (@bintang from the AUR subsite stumbled upon that, by the way).
Offline
You guys all follow [testing]? Because I don't. (@bintang from the AUR subsite stumbled upon that, by the way).
I didn't enable [testing]. BTW my system is 32bit, in case that can be relevant.
Offline
BTW my system is 32bit, in case that can be relevant.
Maybe this is an important hint. I compiled emacs-bzr the day before yesterday without issues against gtk2 and gtk 3 on x86_64.
Offline
Both of my systems with the issue are 64bit.
Offline
I can confirm I get this error on a 64bit machine but not on a 32 bit one, using emacs-bzr.
Offline
I think that, at this point--unless you *absolutely* have to have it--I recommend that emacs-bzr be compiled *without* ImageMagick support. I'd likely look into what the problem is, and (if I do) definitely file a bug report upstream if it's the Emacs devs that are screwing up. Except I've quite a bit on my plate at the moment.
Offline
This has been reported to emacs-bugs. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/60349
Offline