You are not logged in.

#1 2005-07-29 00:30:36

archdaemon
Member
Registered: 2005-01-27
Posts: 83

url_handler.sh url_handler.sh

Tin installs some weird url_handler.sh and then urlview installs its own. Mutt likes urlview. So I get a pacman conflict. But I can rename url_handler.sh to url_handler-tin.sh and reset .tinrc to look for that, it seems, and can -f a pacman of urlview. None of these packages have anything in 'conflicts with', yet they do.

So is this a bug? If so, who's is it? Is my solution a decent in-the-meantime or...?

Offline

#2 2005-07-29 04:11:06

Snowman
Developer/Forum Fellow
From: Montreal, Canada
Registered: 2004-08-20
Posts: 5,212

Re: url_handler.sh url_handler.sh

I would suggest posting a bug report http://bugs.archlinux.org/

Your solution makes sense.  If it works, then you can use it meanwhile.

Offline

#3 2005-07-29 06:12:03

archdaemon
Member
Registered: 2005-01-27
Posts: 83

Re: url_handler.sh url_handler.sh

Okay - but a bug against which package? Both?

Offline

#4 2005-07-29 07:08:15

Snowman
Developer/Forum Fellow
From: Montreal, Canada
Registered: 2004-08-20
Posts: 5,212

Re: url_handler.sh url_handler.sh

Not both, choose one of them.  It doesn't really matter as long as you explain the problem.

Offline

#5 2005-07-29 07:33:48

archdaemon
Member
Registered: 2005-01-27
Posts: 83

Re: url_handler.sh url_handler.sh

Okay, thanks. That was the confusing part, since it was just a collision of two and not a problem with either one individually.

I'll blame tin. smile

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB