You are not logged in.
Lowe: More useable as opposed to what? :?:
Offline
Lowe: More useable as opposed to what? :?:
Well I find pypanel very irritating at times, especially switching beetween desktops.
Offline
could be, but using that gnome-stuff on top of openbox will slow it down, so why not switching to another wm?
Offline
{this thread is already longer than August's! :shock:}
Offline
Well I find pypanel very irritating at times, especially switching beetween desktops.
:shock:
Mr Green
Offline
And you bother using a panel with Openbox because...?
Offline
maybe he wants he panel for a cool screenshot
....or a panel to fit his pager in
Offline
And you bother using a panel with Openbox because...?
Why wouldn't you?
·¬»· i am shadowhand, powered by webfaction
Offline
3 words: middle click menu.
Offline
3 words: middle click menu.
2 words: fullscreened apps.
·¬»· i am shadowhand, powered by webfaction
Offline
Gullible Jones wrote:3 words: middle click menu.
2 words: fullscreened apps.
5 words: isn't this a screenshot thread?
Offline
1 word: cockahoop
wait...did I miss the point of the game?
Offline
1 word: shading!
(BTW, middle-clicking on the title bar will send a window to the bottom layer.)
Offline
@phrakture: oh... *looks around* ...I think you're right.
I'm not going to win this one am I? Not it! I quit!
·¬»· i am shadowhand, powered by webfaction
Offline
·¬»· i am shadowhand, powered by webfaction
Offline
OMG! ATHF! :shock:
Offline
Offline
Where can I find that wallpaper? It's niiice. 8)
·¬»· i am shadowhand, powered by webfaction
Offline
the wallpaper http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/22949045/
the font is aquafont click
It's indeed conky what I'm running. The conky scripts are included in the config file which is located here
Offline
Here is the default setting of the final ArchWM-base.
http://user-contributions.org/projects/ … se-0.5.jpg
I re-coded the whole base (not the tools) by kicking out everything related to Fvwm-crystal. I almost gave up the whole project thinking FVWM is too difficult to configure but its not true. The new trend of FVWM2 gives the impression of high-tech and advance coding, but there is no need. The basic of FVWM does the samething and in a simple manner.
There are only two things needed: (1) start the module/library and, (2) give it a shape and style. This is what ArchWM-base does.
My hindrance, how to compete the other WMs. Even myself I have to get convinced if it can do same as Fluxbox. Yes, it can do. And more.
If you were wondering why making the base look like Fluxbox, now you know.
Markku
Offline
My hindrance, how to compete the other WMs. Even myself I have to get convinced if it can do same as Fluxbox. Yes, it can do. And more.
If you were wondering why making the base look like Fluxbox, now you know.
I don't think you need to compete. FVWM is perfect in it's own right. Extremely flexible.
Nice work on ArchWM-base though.
/michael
Offline
Here is the default setting of the final ArchWM-base.
http://user-contributions.org/projects/ … se-0.5.jpg
A couple of suggestions:
A bit more eye candy could be usefull if it is to be used on an everyday basis by some people. I never tried ArchWM so maybe it's already possible using some of your modules, but well, to me the default look is just too much gray. Yes and I know people could easily change it by hand if it is not included (if they know how to code it), but that's not the idea, right?
One more question. Do you have inlcuded some scripts (wallpaper browsing and setting, weather lookup, mounting, screenshots, clock, etc) ?
That would be nice if you can include those as modules to.
Offline