You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2012-09-26 14:44:43
- attila1964
- Member
- From: Esztergom / Hungary
- Registered: 2011-10-23
- Posts: 33
Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
Hi,
since the latest kernel-update my system doesn't recognize my built-in-webcamera either in terminal nor in Skype:
[burkon64@arch ~]$ lsusb
Bus 005 Device 002: ID 046d:c018 Logitech, Inc. Optical Wheel Mouse
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
In Skype I have got a message "No devices found."...
With LiveCD (for example SuSE 12.2, Manjaro 0.8.1) the same result, too...
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Offline
#2 2012-09-26 20:11:37
- nTia89
- Banned
- From: varese, italy
- Registered: 2008-12-22
- Posts: 1,230
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
have, arch system and live cd, the same kernel?
+pc: custom | AMD Opteron 175 | nForce4 Ultra | 2GB ram DDR400 | nVidia 9800GT 1GB | ArchLinux x86_64 w/ openbox
+laptop: Apple | MacBook (2,1) | 2GB ram | Mac OS X 10.4 -> DIED
+ultrabook: Dell | XPS 13 (9343) | 8GB ram | 256GB ssd | FullHD display | Windows 8.1 64bit ArchLinux x86_64 w/ Gnome
Offline
#3 2012-09-27 04:37:55
- attila1964
- Member
- From: Esztergom / Hungary
- Registered: 2011-10-23
- Posts: 33
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
By Manjaro 0.8.1 the same kernel. (3.5.4-1)
Offline
#4 2012-09-27 10:08:00
- nTia89
- Banned
- From: varese, italy
- Registered: 2008-12-22
- Posts: 1,230
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
and opensuse?
+pc: custom | AMD Opteron 175 | nForce4 Ultra | 2GB ram DDR400 | nVidia 9800GT 1GB | ArchLinux x86_64 w/ openbox
+laptop: Apple | MacBook (2,1) | 2GB ram | Mac OS X 10.4 -> DIED
+ultrabook: Dell | XPS 13 (9343) | 8GB ram | 256GB ssd | FullHD display | Windows 8.1 64bit ArchLinux x86_64 w/ Gnome
Offline
#5 2012-09-27 10:32:30
- attila1964
- Member
- From: Esztergom / Hungary
- Registered: 2011-10-23
- Posts: 33
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
3.4.6
Offline
#6 2012-09-27 10:54:53
- cybertorture
- Member
- Registered: 2010-05-05
- Posts: 339
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
well i guess you do not have some sort of hardware switch off ? Maybe the best practice will be if you boot some older kernel ( or live distro ) and see at least what module you need for it.
O' rly ? Ya rly Oo
Offline
#7 2012-09-27 12:38:45
- nTia89
- Banned
- From: varese, italy
- Registered: 2008-12-22
- Posts: 1,230
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
because with same kernel you have different behaviour, imho it's not a strictly kernel related problem
+pc: custom | AMD Opteron 175 | nForce4 Ultra | 2GB ram DDR400 | nVidia 9800GT 1GB | ArchLinux x86_64 w/ openbox
+laptop: Apple | MacBook (2,1) | 2GB ram | Mac OS X 10.4 -> DIED
+ultrabook: Dell | XPS 13 (9343) | 8GB ram | 256GB ssd | FullHD display | Windows 8.1 64bit ArchLinux x86_64 w/ Gnome
Offline
#8 2012-09-27 15:15:47
- cybertorture
- Member
- Registered: 2010-05-05
- Posts: 339
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
correct me if i m understand this wrong way Oo
since the latest kernel-update
O' rly ? Ya rly Oo
Offline
#9 2012-09-27 15:53:27
- attila1964
- Member
- From: Esztergom / Hungary
- Registered: 2011-10-23
- Posts: 33
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
Before update my previous kernel to 3.5.4-1 the video in Skype worked...
Offline
#10 2012-09-27 16:10:26
- nTia89
- Banned
- From: varese, italy
- Registered: 2008-12-22
- Posts: 1,230
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
Before update my previous kernel to 3.5.4-1 the video in Skype worked...
are you sure to have updated only the kernel?
+pc: custom | AMD Opteron 175 | nForce4 Ultra | 2GB ram DDR400 | nVidia 9800GT 1GB | ArchLinux x86_64 w/ openbox
+laptop: Apple | MacBook (2,1) | 2GB ram | Mac OS X 10.4 -> DIED
+ultrabook: Dell | XPS 13 (9343) | 8GB ram | 256GB ssd | FullHD display | Windows 8.1 64bit ArchLinux x86_64 w/ Gnome
Offline
#11 2012-09-27 16:11:49
- attila1964
- Member
- From: Esztergom / Hungary
- Registered: 2011-10-23
- Posts: 33
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
I have updated all my system, Skype, too...
Offline
#12 2012-09-27 16:14:51
- attila1964
- Member
- From: Esztergom / Hungary
- Registered: 2011-10-23
- Posts: 33
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
Very interesting...
After update 'qt' before about 10 minutes my camera works... 
And 'lsusb' detected my camera:
[burkon64@arch ~]$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0c45:62c0 Microdia Sonix USB 2.0 Camera
Bus 004 Device 002: ID 03f0:1504 Hewlett-Packard DeskJet 920c
Bus 005 Device 002: ID 046d:c018 Logitech, Inc. Optical Wheel Mouse
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Last edited by attila1964 (2012-09-27 16:17:25)
Offline
#13 2012-09-27 17:05:54
- cybertorture
- Member
- Registered: 2010-05-05
- Posts: 339
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
Strange indeed, any pointers in "dmesg" ?
O' rly ? Ya rly Oo
Offline
#14 2012-09-27 17:09:41
- attila1964
- Member
- From: Esztergom / Hungary
- Registered: 2011-10-23
- Posts: 33
Re: Built-in webcamera vs. Skype
Detail from "dmesg":
[ 401.942823] uvcvideo: Found UVC 1.00 device USB 2.0 Camera (0c45:62c0)
[ 401.960160] input: USB 2.0 Camera as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.7/usb1/1-1/1-1:1.0/input/input13
[ 401.960393] usbcore: registered new interface driver uvcvideo
[ 401.960398] USB Video Class driver (1.1.1)
Offline
Pages: 1