FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

rEnr3n · 2012-11-25 03:43:47

The following errors are seen when visiting certain threads:

1. Opening and ending tag mismatch: em line 0 and p:

This page contains the following errors:
error on line XXX at column XXX: Opening and ending tag mismatch: em line 0 and p
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.

error on line 1017 at column 487 - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=39906&p=4
error on line 701 at column 226 - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=34718&p=4

2. AttValue: " or ' expected

This page contains the following errors:
error on line XXX at column XXX: AttValue: " or ' expected
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.

error on line 184 at column 112 - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=13803&p=21

Here is the screenshot of one of the pages: http://s19.postimage.org/ufuy6zb2r/archlinux_forum.png

Last edited by jasonwryan (2012-12-30 06:03:56)

jasonwryan · 2012-11-25 04:24:31

Confirmed.

rEnr3n · 2012-11-25 13:30:02

I found another thread with similar error. I'll be updating the original post as I find more threads.

ewaller · 2012-11-27 14:16:16

Just found this one.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=13803&p=21

cfr · 2012-12-29 03:20:03

If I try to view https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=99036, I get this:

Gwall didoli XML: tag anghydweddiad. Disgwylir: </span>.
Lleoliad: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=99036
Rhif Llinell 278, Colofn 115:Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes</code></pre></div><p>16088688/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1 024,03972</strong></span></p><br /><p>it&#039;s not divisible by 8.<br />and in order to achieve a closest number divisible by 8, 1024, the number of sectors would need to be subtracted by 624:</p><p>(16088688-624)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1024</strong></span></p><p>Is that what the author has done by omitting some sectors at the beginning (the partition starts at 1024) or the end? </p><br /><p>And if 1023 blocks were omitted at the beginning (or 1024, if we count 0 in), the sector/cylinder calculation will be already <strong><span class="bbu">&lt;1024</strong></span>.</p><p>(16088688-1023)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1023.9746</strong></span><br />&#160; &#160; <br />(16088688-1024)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1023.97454</strong></span></p><p>PPS.:<br />Im sorry for being such a pain in the ass, but I want to simply understand the whole situation, since it is quite important for SSDs. <br />And hey, it can be useful for fellow Linux googlers in the future <img src="https://bbs.archlinux.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^

I can translate if that would help.

WonderWoofy · 2012-12-29 03:25:11

I get this on the top of an otherwise normal page:

This page contains the following errors:

error on line 271 at column 117: Opening and ending tag mismatch: span line 0 and strong
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.

Did you get an SSD?

jasonwryan · 2012-12-29 03:29:44

There are a couple of threads like this one from the last three-four months (one just yesterday).

It is difficult to tell if this is just an issue with the way people post stuff into threads or a bug with FluxBB; I am inclining, due to the increased frequency of this happening, to think the latter...

cfr · 2012-12-29 03:35:12

WonderWoofy wrote:

I get this on the top of an otherwise normal page:

This page contains the following errors:

error on line 271 at column 117: Opening and ending tag mismatch: span line 0 and strong
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.

Did you get an SSD?

What's an SSD in this context?

I don't get a normal page at all. What I posted is the entirety of what I get. No normal content is shown at all.

In case it isn't obvious, my message is complaining about a different line/column: "row line 278, column 115" but it is making a similar complaint. "XML separation error: tag disagreement. Expected: </span>" .

Last edited by cfr (2012-12-29 03:40:24)

shulamy · 2012-12-29 11:09:26

i get this massage

XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: </span>.
Location: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=99036
Line Number 278, Column 115:Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes</code></pre></div><p>16088688/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1 024,03972</strong></span></p><br /><p>it&#039;s not divisible by 8.<br />and in order to achieve a closest number divisible by 8, 1024, the number of sectors would need to be subtracted by 624:</p><p>(16088688-624)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1024</strong></span></p><p>Is that what the author has done by omitting some sectors at the beginning (the partition starts at 1024) or the end? </p><br /><p>And if 1023 blocks were omitted at the beginning (or 1024, if we count 0 in), the sector/cylinder calculation will be already <strong><span class="bbu">&lt;1024</strong></span>.</p><p>(16088688-1023)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1023.9746</strong></span><br />&#160; &#160; <br />(16088688-1024)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1023.97454</strong></span></p><p>PPS.:<br />Im sorry for being such a pain in the ass, but I want to simply understand the whole situation, since it is quite important for SSDs. <br />And hey, it can be useful for fellow Linux googlers in the future <img src="https://bbs.archlinux.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^

ezik

litemotiv · 2012-12-29 11:28:13

shulamy wrote:

i get this massage

XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: </span>.
Location: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=99036
Line Number 278, Column 115:Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes</code></pre></div><p>16088688/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1 024,03972</strong></span></p><br /><p>it&#039;s not divisible by 8.<br />and in order to achieve a closest number divisible by 8, 1024, the number of sectors would need to be subtracted by 624:</p><p>(16088688-624)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1024</strong></span></p><p>Is that what the author has done by omitting some sectors at the beginning (the partition starts at 1024) or the end? </p><br /><p>And if 1023 blocks were omitted at the beginning (or 1024, if we count 0 in), the sector/cylinder calculation will be already <strong><span class="bbu">&lt;1024</strong></span>.</p><p>(16088688-1023)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1023.9746</strong></span><br />&#160; &#160; <br />(16088688-1024)/15711=<strong><span class="bbu">1023.97454</strong></span></p><p>PPS.:<br />Im sorry for being such a pain in the ass, but I want to simply understand the whole situation, since it is quite important for SSDs. <br />And hey, it can be useful for fellow Linux googlers in the future <img src="https://bbs.archlinux.org/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^

ezik

Yes the xhtml is malformed (nesting):

<strong><span class="bbu">1 024,03972</strong></span>

This is probably related to the issue we identified earlier, that xhtml is enforced more strictly since recently (remember that mime-type thing Jason? ).

Looks like a FluxBB bug though.

jasonwryan · 2012-12-29 20:46:06

Ah: I hadn't put the two togther

Lie shows up here from time to time, but someone (who knows what they are dealing with--<cough/> litemotiv) might want to open a bug report on their tracker...

rEnr3n · 2012-12-30 05:30:05

When is this going to be fixed? It's been a month >.<

jasonwryan · 2012-12-30 05:52:52

It looks to be a FluxBB bug.

Merging...

ewaller · 2012-12-30 06:34:52

rEnr3n wrote:

When is this going to be fixed? It's been a month >.<

Are you volunteering to fund it?

jasonwryan · 2012-12-30 06:55:38

(Crappy) bug report filed http://fluxbb.org/development/core/tickets/790/

litemotiv · 2012-12-30 11:23:43

jasonwryan wrote:

(Crappy) bug report filed http://fluxbb.org/development/core/tickets/790/

You beat me to it.

P.s., the second bug should not be related and is not a Flux bug, so if you can still edit the ticket then you could remove that (to save them from extra reading/investigating). The only connection is that they both became apparent because of the stricter xhtml enforcement.

Last edited by litemotiv (2012-12-30 11:27:22)

jasonwryan · 2012-12-30 19:16:26

Done

jasonwryan · 2012-12-31 05:28:56

Fixed in 1.5.2

cfr · 2013-01-04 00:56:02

Could you clarify what that means? That is, I'm not sure whether that means that it should be fixed already or if it means it will be fixed. (I don't know how to check the version of what I think is the forum software?). Sorry if I'm being dense. I just found I can't view https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=45692 and it made me look this bug back up.

jasonwryan · 2013-01-04 01:22:03

We are using 1.5.1, which means it will be fixed in the next update.

cfr · 2013-01-04 02:33:49

Oh, right. Thanks. It is OK that it isn't working, then. That is, it is a SEP (Somebody Else's Problem) and not something I need to worry about trying to fix .

Arch Linux

#1 2012-11-25 03:43:47

FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#2 2012-11-25 04:24:31

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#3 2012-11-25 13:30:02

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#4 2012-11-27 14:16:16

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#5 2012-12-29 03:20:03

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#6 2012-12-29 03:25:11

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#7 2012-12-29 03:29:44

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#8 2012-12-29 03:35:12

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#9 2012-12-29 11:09:26

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#10 2012-12-29 11:28:13

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#11 2012-12-29 20:46:06

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#12 2012-12-30 05:30:05

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#13 2012-12-30 05:52:52

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#14 2012-12-30 06:34:52

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#15 2012-12-30 06:55:38

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#16 2012-12-30 11:23:43

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#17 2012-12-30 19:16:26

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#18 2012-12-31 05:28:56

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#19 2013-01-04 00:56:02

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#20 2013-01-04 01:22:03

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

#21 2013-01-04 02:33:49

Re: FluxBB XML Bug? Broken pages...

Board footer