Arch 0.7-1

lilsirecho · 2005-10-02 20:00:12

Judd advises via flyspray that arch 0.7-1 CD install is required in order that upgrade -Syu to latest kernels will perform correctly.

Edit: ArchCD0.7.1 was specified in flyspray #3191. My typo.

Gullible Jones · 2005-10-02 20:32:12

I used the 0.7 floppy install. Worked fine.

(I did get a message "cp: command not found" when installing filesystem, so I reinstalled that package and rebooted after install just to be on the safe side.)

T-Dawg · 2005-10-02 21:50:00

lilsirecho wrote:

Judd advises via flyspray that arch 0.7-1 CD install is required in order that upgrade -Syu to latest kernels will perform correctly.

What?

lilsirecho · 2005-10-02 22:22:07

What is stated is that if user uses archCD0.7 install for his vanilla kernel-2.6.10 that he cannot -Syu , after the install per the CD, to the new kernels with Udev. The 0.7-1 release will allow the -Syu upgrade.

This probably means, unless otherwise modified, any vanilla kernel whether recently installed or already in service, will fail -Syu( as mine did).

This is the jist of what the note from Judd established.

Does this answer your what?

Edit: the archCD version mentioned in #3191 flyspray is 0.7.1 not 0.7-1.

T-Dawg · 2005-10-02 22:26:25

oh yeah, probably because of no devfs support in the kernel, while the install is based around devfs.
Please keep this info here on this thread though

Gullible Jones · 2005-10-02 22:28:02

I'm afraid I cannot understand you. Apologies if you're not very good at English.

lilsirecho · 2005-10-02 23:09:40

Penguin understands....

zba78 · 2005-10-03 10:54:00

lilsirecho wrote:

Judd advises via flyspray that arch 0.7-1 CD install is required in order that upgrade -Syu to latest kernels will perform correctly.
Edit: ArchCD0.7.1 was specified in flyspray #3191. My typo.

Great news. I was wondering whether some sort of temporary fix would be released before 0.8

So will 0.7-1 ship with 2.6.13 by default or an earlier kernel but with udev installed by default?

T-Dawg · 2005-10-03 10:59:27

So will 0.7-1 ship with 2.6.13 by default or an earlier kernel but with udev installed by default?

I would imagine so otherwise it would defeat the purpose of even having 0.7-1, kernel 2.6.13 has no devfs support.

dtw · 2005-10-03 11:12:07

Isn't it 0.7.1 not 0.7-1?

T-Dawg · 2005-10-03 11:13:51

dibblethewrecker wrote:

Isn't it 0.7.1 not 0.7-1?

yeah, just noticed his edit above....

dtw · 2005-10-03 11:20:16

Penguin, when DO you sleep, mate?

T-Dawg · 2005-10-03 11:26:09

dibblethewrecker wrote:

Penguin, when DO you sleep, mate?

um....8 hours ago? :?

Lowe · 2005-10-03 13:24:47

When is 0.7.1 out? I need to reinstall soon and have been holding it off in hope it would be released soon.

Snowman · 2005-10-03 17:36:39

Lowe wrote:

When is 0.7.1 out? I need to reinstall soon and have been holding it off in hope it would be released soon.

I *think* Judd wants to release 0.7.1 by the end of the month.

Lowe · 2005-10-03 18:54:40

Snowman wrote:

Lowe wrote:
When is 0.7.1 out? I need to reinstall soon and have been holding it off in hope it would be released soon.
I *think* Judd wants to release 0.7.1 by the end of the month.

Hmm sounds good, but i'm just gonna reinstall now anyway.

Arch Linux

#1 2005-10-02 20:00:12

Arch 0.7-1

#2 2005-10-02 20:32:12

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#3 2005-10-02 21:50:00

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#4 2005-10-02 22:22:07

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#5 2005-10-02 22:26:25

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#6 2005-10-02 22:28:02

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#7 2005-10-02 23:09:40

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#8 2005-10-03 10:54:00

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#9 2005-10-03 10:59:27

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#10 2005-10-03 11:12:07

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#11 2005-10-03 11:13:51

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#12 2005-10-03 11:20:16

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#13 2005-10-03 11:26:09

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#14 2005-10-03 13:24:47

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#15 2005-10-03 17:36:39

Re: Arch 0.7-1

#16 2005-10-03 18:54:40

Re: Arch 0.7-1

Board footer